Do the maths

I agree that higher education institutions should consider whether their peripheral entry requirements (usually in maths and/or English) are really necessary (your report, 31 May. This issue may be particularly relevant to dyslexics, but it should not be framed as a special dispensation to anyone, or more muddled thinking will ensue.

The current system of allowing some (often dyslexic) pupils extra time in examinations is reasonable as speed of writing is not considered a fundamental element being assessed.

However, allowing some pupils to use a calculator in non-calculator exams is unfair. If the exam board has decided that the ability to perform calculations unaided is a part of the assessment, and that those less good at it will therefore be penalised, the idea that some can be allowed a calculator if they can show that they are sufficiently poor without it is unfair.

The student not quite bad enough to be allowed a calculator is the loser.

RICHARD LUCAS

Cowan Road

Edinburgh

Related topics: