Ebola halted before it engulfs other African states

The economic damage of a major outbreak in Ivory Coast would be felt around the world. Picture: Getty
The economic damage of a major outbreak in Ivory Coast would be felt around the world. Picture: Getty
Share this article
Have your say

The World Health Organisation (WHO) said yesterday it was “reasonably confident” that the Ebola virus plaguing the West African countries of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea had not spread into neighbouring states.

Asked whether countries such as Guinea Bissau and Ivory Coast might have cases of the disease crossing their borders without knowing about or reporting them, WHO assistant director general Keiji Fukuda said he considered that unlikely.

“We are reasonably confident right now we are not seeing widespread transmission into neighbouring countries,” Mr Fukuda said in a briefing. “It ­remains a concern [but] right now I think we are not seeing it. We will keep looking for further spread of infection.”

Last week, the WHO said it would send teams of experts to Mali and Ivory Coast, two of the countries at highest risk, to check their preparedness.

The economic damage of a major outbreak in Ivory Coast would be felt around the world, since it and next-door Ghana produce about 60 per cent of the world’s cocoa beans. Although Senegal and Nigeria managed to contain the disease after it was imported by travellers, Ebola is still raging in the three countries at the heart of the epidemic, the worst Ebola outbreak on record.

At least 4,877 people are known to have died, but the true toll may be three times as many.

The response to the disease is now based on a “70-70-60 plan” – to get 70 per cent of patients in isolation and 70 per cent of bodies buried safely within a 60-day period ending on 1 December.

But the elements needed to achieve that – bed spaces, treatment centres, laboratories, dead-body management teams and volunteers – are still far short of what is required.

The WHO originally appealed for 12,000 local staff and 750 foreign experts, but it has raised those targets to 20,000 and 1,000 respectively. Mr Fukuda said there were only 600 foreign experts so far. He said: “It has been terrifically difficult to get enough health workers.”

The WHO’s emergency committee advising on Ebola said yesterday that screening people leaving Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea remained critical for reducing the spread of the disease.

At a minimum, exit screening should consist of “a questionnaire, a temperature measurement and, if fever is discovered, an assessment of the risk that the fever is caused by Ebola,” the committee said.

Meanwhile, the husband of a Spanish nursing assistant who beat Ebola, Teresa Romero, says his wife now knows that authorities put down their dog while she was in hospital and is questioning that decision.

Javier Limon said: “The dog, wasn’t to blame for anything.”

Spanish officials had said the dog was a possible risk for transmitting the virus.