Prisons watchdog warns custody cell toilets are a ‘biohazard’

A prison watchdog has issued a warning over the condition of custody cells at a Scottish court. Picture: TSPL
A prison watchdog has issued a warning over the condition of custody cells at a Scottish court. Picture: TSPL
Share this article
0
Have your say

A prison watchdog has warned that urinals in custody cells at a Scottish court are a “potential biohazard”.

An inspection report by HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland (HMIPS) found people held in cells at Paisley Sheriff Court custody unit were continuing to use the deactivated urinals, which “emanated an odour of stale urine”.

In her foreword to the report, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland Wendy Sinclair-Gieben, said: “Deactivated urinals within the cells and the lack of sanitary bins caused a potential biohazard.”

READ MORE: Clutha inquiry: Helicopter operators ‘concerned about fuel indicators’ before fatal crash

The report states: “There were urinals in each of the holding cells. During the inspection, they had been deactivated and emanated an odour of stale urine.

“Court custody unit (CCU) staff advised that prisoners were instructed not to use the urinals and to ask to be taken from the holding cell to the toilet.

“However, this was frequently ignored and prisoners use the urinals. As they had been deactivated, they could not be flushed and a request had to be made for cleaners to attend and dispose of the urine.”

READ MORE: SNP veteran ‘quit party after bitter clash with MP Cherry’

Since the inspection, sanitary bins have been installed, the inspectors were informed, with prisoners previously having had to leave bagged sanitary products in a corner of the cell for daily collection.

Removing or covering the cell urinals to prevent use was one of series of recommendations made by inspectors.

Generally, the report praised the court custody unit and highlighted good practice in making provision for people with restricted mobility.

Inspectors also found two prisoners, who were partners and both accused and alleged victims in a domestic violence incident, were marked as being needed to be kept apart and had been in police and court custody but had been transferred in the same vehicle to court.

The report states that during this journey the man was shouting at the woman and telling her not to talk to other prisoners.

Further recommendations include stopping the practice of having legal representatives shouting the name of the prisoner they are visiting to staff from perimeter gate, which inspectors said breached confidentiality and “could potentially identify enemies or those prisoners at high risk”.

Inspectors also recommend dealing with the “offensive graffiti” in the cells and increasing the use of video conferencing to cut the number of prisoners having to use the court custody unit, which they said would save money and reduce risk.