Alcohol minimum pricing rules have not hurt Scots retailers, says report

The report says there has been little impact on retailers since the ruling was brought in. Picture: John Devlin
The report says there has been little impact on retailers since the ruling was brought in. Picture: John Devlin
Share this article
0
Have your say

The introduction of minimum unit pricing for alcohol has had little impact on retailer revenues, new research suggests.

A report on the economic impact of minimum unit pricing (MUP), commissioned by NHS Health Scotland, found that the policy led to a drop in sales of alcoholic drinks in the nine months following its introduction last May.

However, retailers questioned for the study reported that while there has been a “small but significant decrease” in the volume of drinks sold, the overall effects on revenue have been small as increased prices have compensated for the lower volume of sales.

The effect on producer revenues and profitability has been negative but the impact has been “small or negligible” since the minimum 50p per unit price was introduced in May 2018, it found.

No retailers or producers reported closing local units, reducing staff numbers or reducing investment.

Researchers carried out case studies with eight organisations representing different parts of the industry, including a supermarket, convenience and specialist off-trade retailers, an on-trade retailer, spirits producers and two brewers.

Andrew Leicester, manager at Frontier Economics, which carried out the study, said: “The respondents interviewed in this study suggested that demand changed in a number of ways in the first nine months following MUP coming into force, with sales of products that were previously retailing below the minimum unit price decreasing the most.

“Demand for smaller sizes, low-alcohol products or premium products less affected by price increases, has seen some producers and retailers adapt their strategy and product offering in response to MUP.”

He added: “The research has so far found no evidence of MUP having a significant impact on the profitability, turnover or employment of Scottish retailers located near the border.”

Retailers reported that many consumers have switched to smaller pack or bottle sizes as a result of MUP and many have moved over to a variety of substitute alcoholic and low-alcohol drinks.

Sales have decreased the most for products that were previously retailing far below MUP, the study found.

The researchers also interviewed retailers on both sides of the Scotland-England border about whether they thought MUP had led to an increase in people from Scotland buying alcohol from stores in England.

They found some evidence of this, although retailers noted that cross-border purchasing was happening prior to the introduction of MUP, as many consumers who live near the border in Scotland work in Carlisle or Berwick-upon-Tweed.