Standard Life Assurance fined £30m by FCA over annuity sales failures

Standard Life Assurance has been fined £30 million by the City regulator for failures relating to sales of retirement annuities which created risks staff would put their own financial needs ahead of their customers.
Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said Standard Life Assurance Limiteds controls 'needed to place fairness to customers at their heart'. Picture: contributedMark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said Standard Life Assurance Limiteds controls 'needed to place fairness to customers at their heart'. Picture: contributed
Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said Standard Life Assurance Limiteds controls 'needed to place fairness to customers at their heart'. Picture: contributed

Standard Life Assurance Limited (SLAL) - formerly part of the Standard Life Aberdeen group - failed to adequately monitor the quality of the calls between its call handlers and non-advised customers, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.

At the same time, frontline staff were offered large financial incentives to sell annuities – guaranteed incomes that people buy with their pension pots when they retire.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The FCA said this gave rise to a significant risk that SLAL’s call handlers would fail to provide customers with the information they needed to choose an appropriate annuity.

For instance, where customers have health or lifestyle factors which may shorten their life expectancy, they may be eligible for an enhanced annuity - which could mean a better rate.

The FCA said SLAL used “high level” call guidelines which gave call handlers significant discretion about how they communicated with customers.

In January 2017, SLAL voluntarily agreed to conduct a past business review to identify and pay redress to customers who were likely to have suffered, or did suffer, loss as a result of its failures.

By the end of May this year, SLAL had paid around £25.3m to more than 15,300 customers.

Based on payments made to date, the estimated total redress payable will be around £61.2m, the FCA said. This covers back-payments and interest paid to affected customers to put them in the position they would have been in had they bought an enhanced annuity.

SLAL will continue to make payments to affected customers at the enhanced rate for the remainder of their lives in accordance with the terms of their annuity policies, and has set aside additional reserves to cover future payments.

Imposing a fine of £30.8m, the FCA said customers require accurate information when choosing a complex financial product such as an annuity.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It said: “This is especially so for non-advised sales, where the customer selects the annuity based on factual information and does not receive financial advice.”

Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, added: “Standard Life Assurance Limited’s controls needed to place fairness to customers at their heart.

“Here, the financial incentives available to staff for selling non-advised annuities by telephone created conflicts which led to unfair outcomes for some customers. Firms must have controls in place to ensure they are prioritising fairness to customers.”

SLAL’s past business review is ongoing under the ownership of the Phoenix Group, which bought the company last year, and the firm expects to complete it by the end of 2019.

Concerned customers who bought a non-advised annuity may contact SLAL, as a member of the Phoenix Group, directly.

SLAL did not dispute the FCA’s findings, which meant it qualified for a 30 per cent discount. Otherwise the FCA would have imposed a financial penalty of almost £44m.

Susan McInnes, SLAL chief executive and Phoenix Group director, said: “While this is an historic issue and one we were aware of when we acquired Standard Life Assurance Limited, we would like to apologise to affected customers, all of whom we have already been in contact with as part of the programme of customer redress. We have also reviewed and updated our telephone practices as part of this process.

“Whenever we get things wrong, we seek to learn from our mistakes and are absolutely focused on putting things right. Our remediation programme for affected customers is progressing well and we expect it to be completed by the end of the year.”