Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 1st December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Zero hour as Zimbabwe wages war on inflation



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 July 2008
ZIMBABWE'S central bank governor yesterday slashed ten zeros from the country's worthless currency and resuscitated old coins in a desperate attempt to halt hyperinflation.
"The Zimbabwe dollar will be redenominated by a factor of one to ten, which means we are removing ten zeros from our monetary value: $10 billion today will be reduced to $1, effective from 1 August," said Gideon Gono in a televised address.
This is the second time in two years that the Reserve Bank governor has been forced to lop zeros from the local currency as he fights record inflation, currently estimated at more than 2,000,000 per cent.

In 2006, he slashed three zeros and sent bank employees into remote rural areas to mop up old banknotes in the now infamous Operation Sunrise, which was meant to herald Zimbabwe's economic recovery.

But the sham re-election last month of Robert Mugabe has sent the Zimbabwe dollar plummeting again. With the country on a knife-edge this week as talks between Mr Mugabe's Zanu-PF and the opposition appeared to falter, the British pound changed hands for a record one trillion Zimbabwe dollars, nearly ten times the official rate.

A loaf of bread soared to $300 billion – three times a teacher's monthly salary. Calculators, computers and bank machines have been unable to cope with the extra zeros.

Dr Gono, Mr Mugabe's personal banker, announced the introduction of a $500 note. It will be worth five trillion of the old dollars. The note will not be enough to buy a tub of ice-cream. A $100 billion note was brought in last week.

The bank chief said old and new notes would co-exist until 31 December. He joked that Zimbabwe's domestic workers would be "seriously empowered" by the reintroduction of old $1 and $5 coins.

The coins were last used around eight years ago before Mr Mugabe's chaotic programme of white land seizures first sparked mounting inflation. Wealthy Zimbabweans gave the coins away years ago.

Speaking after the governor, Mr Mugabe threatened to impose a state of emergency if businesses kept hiking prices.

In a threat likely to erode what little investor confidence remains here, he said: "If you drive us more than you have done, we will impose emergency measures and we don't want to place our country in a situation of emergency rules."

Businesses have been battered by Mr Mugabe's price slash last year, which saw thousands of traders arrested. Police frequently arrest business people found charging in foreign currency, which is illegal.

This month, the regime announced that it had launched an audit of Western-owned companies ahead of the implementation of controversial black empowerment laws. Fear of the authorities has forced many businesses underground. Private warehouses sell goods such as cooking oil and margarine in hard currency only to "vetted" customers.

Dr Gono blames the crisis on "illegal" sanctions imposed by Britain and the United States. Yesterday he put on a stern face, but his address at times threatened to degenerate into farce.

Scheduled to begin at 9am, the proceedings did not kick off until 10:30am, leaving dozens of businesspeople, politicians and economists gathered at Harare's International Conference Centre plenty of time to guzzle free bottles of Mazoe Orange Juice.

After a senior official read a prayer, an embarrassed Dr Gono was forced to retire from the podium before he started his speech. He asked for "just five or ten minutes" to finish it, prompting speculation he had been ordered to make changes.

Transmission was then frequently interrupted, leaving viewers watching an advert for Japanese car engines, that was played repeatedly.





The full article contains 610 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 July 2008 10:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe
 
1

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 31/07/2008 08:13:09
This will fail as it deals with symptoms instead of causes. As an economist I am grateful to Mugabe because this episode will form a fascinating chapter in my next book. As a humand being I wish Mugabe and cronies had never been.
2

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth, North Britain 31/07/2008 11:50:56
Hope Broon is paying attention as the inflation we're experiencing now is getting stupid.
3

Gulliver,

Harare 31/07/2008 12:28:20
Check out for yourself what Mugabe said at the event and at least form a more complete picture.

http://www.herald.co.zw/inside.aspx?sectid=1477&cat=1

Some of you believe that Mugabe is rabid about controlling business and stifling entrepreneurship but that is far from the truth. I live in Zimbabwe and whislt I struggle with certain controlled prices I have also experienced first hand the kind of indiscipline SOME in the private sector have. A medium size pizza was going for (using the PARALLEL MARKET RATES) the equivalent of around 380 Rands or round USD 47.50!!! For a MEDIUM PIZZA surely!!! This is the kind of madness in private sector pricing in Zimbabwe that the media hardly exposes.

And also the notion that the somehow people don't know where the real problem is is UNFOUNDED. When Mugabe launched a basic goods intervention program he specifically mentioned that the real solution lay in increasing productivity across all sectors and especially agriculture. Which is why they have launched an ambitious mechanisation program which has seen the country import over 2,600 tractors and other farm equipment over the last 12 months.



4

Kufahakurotwi,

Zimbabwe 31/07/2008 12:33:18
I am a Zimbabwean who has lived in this beautiful Country since birth. I have experienced the hardships since 1998 and I am of the opinion that enough is enough and this madness must come to an end. I am kindly appealing to the EU, USA and Britain to please have mercy on Zimbabweans and remove the sanctions as they are affecting the poor and ordinary citizens of Zimbabwe. Those on the sanctions list are not suffering at all. I am om my knees please remove these sanctions they are killing more people than the violence that is alledged to have happened prior to the run off. I pray to God that through his righteousness he will speak through those who imposed sanctions to remove them to save Zimbabwe
5

Gulliver,

Harare 31/07/2008 12:34:08
Before some of you go there- Pizza can be said to be a non-essential item so therefore people would simply resist buying until rationality prevailed. It does not form the average household's consumption basket and therefore what is its relevance in the discussion? Answer, one should not overlook the important of relative pricing and how people psychologically come up with parity pricing for internally produced goods and those imported. People will begin to think that either the currency is overvalued and speculate further on the currency, or simply raise the prices of whatever they produce themselves, e.g, tomatoes, etc.
6

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 31/07/2008 12:34:54
Maybe Mugabe is Hitler reincarnated. He's got the same moustache.
7

oder,

Scotland 31/07/2008 14:07:09
Kufahakurotwi,Zimbabwe

unfortunately its not the sanctions that are the problem, companies will not invest in Zimbabwe were there is political instability created by Mugabe and his policies this would cause the investors to lose even more money!(no point throwing good money after bad) No! Mugabe has to go it`s the only way long term peace and stability will return and brighter prospects for the people of Zimbabwe.
8

Climate change is a fraud,

31/07/2008 14:47:13
The US is heading for a major depression as is Britain.

If you believe Brown and his Labour mafia mob, then you are a fool.

We are already in a recession. The police state is being built up around us because the elite know that we will soon be entering a depression that will make 1933 look like a dolls' tea party.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/
9

Kufahakurotwi,

Harare 31/07/2008 15:02:42
Order, Scotland,

Does the International Community have to punish ordinary Zimbabweans inorder to force Mugabe to go. A Country such as ours can not run on a cash economy basis. We cannot get balance of payments support from IMF and the World Bank because of the sunctions.Our industries cannot produce due to acute shortage of foreign currency to source raw materials hence our people have lost their jobs and are now destitute.
Why should thirteen million citizens suffer because the West want to punish one man. It is the Europeans who brought Christianity to us Africans. The Bible says we should forgive those who sin against us and all I am saying that ordinary people are suffering because of these illegal sunctions and we a begging those in Power to please remove the sunctions as they are not targeted but meant to make the people and the economy to scream!! so that one man can step down is this fair?
10

Griffe,

31/07/2008 15:20:49
Too little too late. Get rid of Mugabe.
11

Bemused and above it all,

31/07/2008 15:28:27
#7
given he was born before hitlers death, perhaps you should think about what reincarnation means
12

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 17:36:20
Here's a hint: Stop printing money!!!
13

oder,

Scotland 01/08/2008 00:44:38
Kufahakurotwi,Harare

I know Zimbabwe well! under Smith there were sanctions and embargo`s of all kinds and the economy boomed so much in fact the they called Zimbabwe the bread basket of Africa! no Zimbabweans suffered as they do now!
Mugabe himself said they have inherited the "Jewel of Africa" the only problem was he wasn't then and isn't now up to the job! the most important people that will invest in Zimbabwe have no faith in Mugabe!investors need to have confidence in the country and the government before they invest you may not like it my friend but that`s economic reality! the real world!

In life nothing is fair! you have to create wealth which was handed to Mugabe which he then destroyed with his policies Zimbabweans(and the rest of Africa for that matter) may want to back Mugabe, then they will pay the cost both in economic development and political stability and security.

Unlike Zimbabwe political leaders here cant order people to invest in other countries its other countries that have to create the right conditions so that people will invest.

Not so long ago a politician was sacked by Mugabe why ?because he asked the previous (white) politicians how they managed to keep a strong vibrant economy going under sanctions, in other words the people who had the knowledge and ability were ignored by Mugabe due to his own brand of racism.
the international community is not the cause of the suffering in Zimbabwe.
14

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 01/08/2008 01:12:13
#12

"given he was born before hitlers death, perhaps you should think about what reincarnation means"

....Are you some sort of bible thumper or are you Hitler reincarnated?
15

Gulliver,

Harare 01/08/2008 12:44:41
# 15 Oder

ZIMBABWE WAS NOT "The Jewel of Africa" when Mugabe took over. Rampant poverty, illiteracy, inadequate access to health facilities and an economy devastated by war were certainly not "Jewels" one would be proud inherit. The economy was in pretty bad shape even during the 80s but the thing that kept things going were the significant inflows from donors and multi-lateral institutions. They covered up the gaping hole in the economy.

Also, please note that Zimbabwe attained its breadbasket status AFTER Ian Smith and NOT BEFORE. By 1999 75% of the grain in the country was grown by small-holder farmers whilst settler farmers concentrated more on tobacco and horticulture.

16

oder,

Scotland 01/08/2008 21:50:12
Mugabe was quoted making that statement fact!


you said

"The economy was in pretty bad shape even during the 80s but the thing that kept things going were the significant inflows from donors and multi-lateral institutions. They covered up the gaping hole in the economy."

if you believe that ! you will believe anything what happened to these significant multi-lateral institutions? They covered up the gaping hole in the economy you jest!

Also, please note that Zimbabwe attained its breadbasket status AFTER Ian Smith and NOT BEFORE. By 1999 75% of the grain in the country was grown by small-holder farmers whilst settler farmers concentrated more on tobacco and horticulture.

on this point you are denial and being totally dishonest! and Zimbabwe`s food problem began when Mugabe stole the land from the farmers and since he gave all the land to Africans who don't have a clue how to farm! as you are aware Africans are not farmers and never have done commercial farming on the scale of European farmers(Africans are cattlemen from as far North Kenya to South Africa) No African culture anywhere on the African continent has nothing more than subsistence farming,2 million to 3 million Zimbabweans have ran off to South Africa why is that?
because small holder farms are the breadbasket of Zimbabwe? aye right!you are an apologist Mugabe like him you blame all the ills from democracy to white men for African failure!
Africa has had lots of mileage out of playing the victim think on this every country today at some time in their history have been colonized by someone,most learn from that experience gained their independence and moved on to better things
except when it comes to Africa! what is it that all these other peoples and different races can do that Africans cant? the problems that you have are of your own making... take a good long look at yourselves!


17

Gulliver,

Harare 02/08/2008 12:13:25
# 18 Oder,

I will try to be as factual as possible, I hope you will too in your analysis. I will try as much as possible to give you the relevant references to backup any assertions I make.

GAP IN THE ECONOMY
Prior to independence the economy had been designed to cater for the needs of an elite racist few. The pattern and pace of development (even during UDI) was dictated by the needs of the less than 400,000 settlers whilst the majority of the indeginous community was largely marginalized.

Prior to independence the economic cake was SMALL BUT SUFFICIENT TO CATER FOR A FEW.

Whereas only one university, a couple of schools, clinics, dams, roads, urban housing, etc. were sufficient to reinforce and sustain the dominance of the settlers the same economy couldn't cater for a greater dispensation brought about after Independence which sought to address serious socio-economic imbalances.

Post independence the government had a huge burden to try and redress the situation but they did not have the revenue to carry out the required development, which is why the government ran on huge budget deficits almost entirely throughout its existence, running deficits of around 6% in order to build schools, healthcare facilities, etc. Google Thabo Mbeki's letter to Mugabe in 2002. You can also google stats from the World Bank and IMF about the Zim economy in the period before and after 1980.

The developmental gaps were funded in part by donors such as SIDA, CIDA and USAID. Many British donors also came on board to support the new government. The IMF and the World Bank came in with Balance of Payments support. Almost all developing countries by historical/colonial nature are largely RESOURCE BASED and hardly generate sufficient inflows to finance developmental and trade needs without significant help.
18

Gulliver,

Harare 02/08/2008 12:22:46
Continued...

Also go to this website to fully comprehend the effect of funding gaps and donor activity http://www.jica.go.jp/english/resources/publications/study/topical/oecd_dac/pdf/dac3.pdf
19

Gulliver,

Harare 02/08/2008 12:59:51
Continued..

ZIMBABWE, BREAD BASKET BEFORE OR AFTER 1980?
"The figures for Rhodesia are impressive, but then one must be reminded that the sector of the farming community producing these exportable surpluses are the Europeans. If one turns to the TTLs and their level of production, the pattern common to the rest of Africa emerges. Let us look at TTL farming briefly and compare it to production in the European sector. In the 10-year period 1966-1975, the gross output of African agriculture virtually doubled from $52,1 million to $102,2 million, while in the same period the gross output from European agriculture increased from $144,7 million to $362 million. These figures show that the European sector with virtually the same area available to it for agricultural production produces roughly three times the output of the African sector." http://www.rhodesia.nl/farmeratwar.html

The writer makes a correct analysis that white farmers were more productive on the land compared to communal farmers, however, what he doesn't point out is that the settler regime deliberately drove out locals from the fertile lands into "RESERVES" that were relatively less productive and in arid regions. They actually came up with all sorts of policies (agriculture taxes, chibaro system of forced labor) to make farming difficult for Africans because they wanted cheap labor on their farms and mines. They also wanted to bring down competition. The surprising thing from the above quote is that African farmers despite all the hardships actually managed to double their output in the period indicated.

If you google you will discover that Zimbabwe's best agricultural output years have been post-independence, with a greater share of grain and cotton production coming from indeginous farmers for a number of reasons. One of them being that commercial farmers moved away from farming maize whose price was controlled by the government to more profitable crops such as tobacco, whilst locals who consid
20

Gulliver,

Harare 02/08/2008 13:20:16
consider maize a staple food continued to expand their output with the support of government. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/657149/Zimbabwe/44154/Agriculture#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked&title=Zimbabwe%20%3A%3A%20Agriculture%20--%20Britannica%20Online%20Encyclopedia

So why hasn't agricultural production jumped since more locals have greater access to more fertile land? The single biggest reason acknowledged by almost everyone is the issue of the CLIMATE- erratic rainfall patterns. http://www.worldfoodprize.org/assets/YouthInstitute/05proceedings/PinkertonAcademy.pdf

Other factors that have affected output in my view rank lower on the assessment, whilst YES I agree to some extent the removal of settler farmers DID AFFECT PRODUCTION we just don't agree on the relative importance. Whereas you blame largely for the decline in output I instead would give it a 25% rating at most (the 25% produced by settler farmers before the reforms), they at least had irrigation to manage the risk of unpredictable rainfall patterns. Our government and people haven't put enough effort at managing this material risk.

I have tried to steer away from your provocative statements about Africans as much as possible. But the following remarks cannot go without a response. "Mugabe stole the land from the farmers and since he gave all the land to Africans who don't have a clue how to farm!" How would this statement sound, "Brown stole the land (in Great Britain) from the Africans and gave it to Europeans who have no clue about farming?"

Their abilities to farm aside.. your suggestion that someone stole something means that it was honestly theirs.

Did the Europeans bring land from Europe? Was Africa a vaccum when they came here? Land in AFRICA "stolen" from EUROPEANS?????

All I'm trying to do is to make you see how such reckless statements strike the raw nerves of many Africans whose ancestors were violently displaced by colonial powers.

I respect peopl
21

Gulliver,

Harare 02/08/2008 13:22:44
I respect peoples of all the world who have shared many good things with Africa and continue to be sincere partners for development.

People like you will have to rise above being lop-sided in your analyses and making arrogant remarks which expose either your ignorance or racist tendencies.
22

oder,

Scotland 03/08/2008 02:08:23
I will try to be as factual as possible, I hope you will too in your analysis. I will try as much as possible to give you the relevant references to backup any assertions I make.

you said

Prior to independence the economic cake was SMALL BUT SUFFICIENT TO CATER FOR A FEW.


prior to independence 2/3 million Zimbabwean`s did not need to illegally enter South Africa in search of food and work as is the case now! which casts some suspicion on your argument that Africans were marginalized and that the economy was designed for the elite few! I am not saying things were perfect nor do I advocate the return of white government so there is no need for you to play the race card! however good government is the issue black or white irrelevant and as many African governments have shown not their "speciality"

you said
Post independence the government had a huge burden to try and redress the situation but they did not have the revenue to carry out the required development,

correct! prior to independence neither did the Smith government although education in the then Rhodesia for Africans far exceeded many African countries!

1972 figures

total school enrolment from primary classes through to secondary including technical,vocational, special needs
European 59,534 / African 728,538 in the field of higher education 4,941 were enrolled at the two agricultural colleges two technical colleges one teachers training college and the rest in the university of Rhodesia, at that time education in Rhodesia was the single biggest item in the national budget 20% it was the highest in the world even today few countries spend that amount! and none of them African! the ratio was 1 child in 6 amongst the best in Africa, not good enough in my book!compare to the worst in Africa (Ethiopia) 1 in 106 you may argue that the Europeans didn't spend enough on education, but as you point out Mugabe didn't have enough money either which indicates that the problem was economic and not
23

oder,

Scotland 03/08/2008 02:16:26
cont.
a deliberate attempt to marginalise anyone as you claim.

you saidI have tried to steer away from your provocative statements about Africans as much as possible. But the following remarks cannot go without a response. "Mugabe stole the land from the farmers and since he gave all the land to Africans who don't have a clue how to farm!" How would this statement sound, "Brown stole the land (in Great Britain) from the Africans and gave it to Europeans who have no clue about farming?"

you said
All I'm trying to do is to make you see how such reckless statements strike the raw nerves of many Africans whose ancestors were violently displaced by colonial powers.


in the modern world anyone born in Zimbabwe as most of these farmers are in fact Zimbabweans,most of these farm were owned by the same family for generations and as Zimbabwean are entitled equal rights as any Black Zimbabwean! yes Mugabe stole the land I stand by that statement! if you apply the very same conditions to the white farmers that you claim they applied to the Africans then you are no better than they were, that makes you and all Zimbabweans who apply it guilty of racism.

you said
I respect peoples of all the world who have shared many good things with Africa and continue to be sincere partners for development.

suggest you put this good suggestion into practice with the Farmers that Mugabe stole the land from.

you said
People like you will have to rise above being lop-sided in your analyses and making arrogant remarks which expose either your ignorance or racist tendencies.

suggest you take your own advice on this one!

the rest of your post is irrelevant!












24

Gulliver,

Harare 04/08/2008 08:36:55
Oder,

"in the modern world anyone born in Zimbabwe as most of these farmers are in fact Zimbabweans,most of these farm were owned by the same family for generations and as Zimbabwean are entitled equal rights as any Black Zimbabwean! yes Mugabe stole the land I stand by that statement!"


If those you claim were truly Zimbabweans they would not have sought to undermine the process that intended to redress the historical injustices of the colonial era.

-They would not have spent the first 10 years slowing down the process of land reform through the "willing buyer, willing seller" arrangement.
-They would not have supported the stance taken by Britain under the leadership of Tony Blair to renege on the tenets of the Lancaster House agreement in 1998.
-They would not have further worked to frustrate the land reform process by hijacking the MDC agenda and using NGOs such as the NCA to undermine a key clause in the 2000 Constitutional Referendum that sought to ensure justice was rendered (LOGICALLY and PEACEFULLY) on the issue of the land.

The land "invasions" began in the Svosve communal lands in 1997/98 during that time the police were sent in to disperse the "squatters". It only took the lack of cooperation of the white farmers by them decampaigning the Referendum in 2000 for Mugabe to say the "invaders" are demonstrating.

I will also refer you to MICAH Chapter 2 in the Bible to help you see the other side of things.

I gave you the benefit of doubt before you repeated your comment that land was stolen by Zimbabweans from EUROPEANS to give to other Zimbabweans in AFRICA. If you continue on this path you will just prove yourself to be biased beyond salvage.

Your attempts to show that Smith was a "better" colonialist compared to his peers don't really support the point you were trying to make that the regime was not racially biased in it's socio-economic programs, and also, that they were not deliberately trying to marginalise Africans. If you SI
25

Gulliver,

Harare 04/08/2008 13:20:12
Oder,

I am glad that you and I agree on one key point which is :
- Zimbabwe was not the Jewel of Africa when Smith handed over power to Mugabe in 1980. You acknowledge resource limitations during Smith's time which is the truth and that's good.

"in the modern world anyone born in Zimbabwe as most of these farmers are in fact Zimbabweans,most of these farm were owned by the same family for generations and as Zimbabwean are entitled equal rights as any Black Zimbabwean! yes Mugabe stole the land I stand by that statement!"


If those you claim were truly Zimbabweans they would not have sought to undermine the process that intended to redress the historical injustices of the colonial era.

-They would not have spent the first 10 years slowing down the process of land reform through the "willing buyer, willing seller" arrangement.
-They would not have supported the stance taken by Britain under the leadership of Tony Blair to renege on the tenets of the Lancaster House agreement in 1998.
-They would not have further worked to frustrate the land reform process by hijacking the MDC agenda and using NGOs such as the NCA to undermine a key clause in the 2000 Constitutional Referendum that sought to ensure justice was rendered (LOGICALLY and PEACEFULLY) on the issue of the land.

The land "invasions" began in the Svosve communal lands in 1997/98 during that time the police were sent in to disperse the "squatters". It only took the lack of cooperation of the white farmers by them decampaigning the Referendum in 2000 for Mugabe to say the "invaders" are demonstrating.

I will also refer you to MICAH Chapter 2 in the Bible to help you see the other side of things.

I gave you the benefit of doubt before you repeated your comment that land was stolen by Zimbabweans from EUROPEANS to give to other Zimbabweans in AFRICA. If you continue on this path you will just prove yourself to be biased beyond salvage.

Your attempts to show that Smith was a "better" co
26

Gulliver,

Harare 04/08/2008 14:03:58
Your attempts to show that Smith was a "better" colonialist compared to his peers don't really support the point you were trying to make that the regime was not racially biased in it's socio-economic programs, and also, that they were not deliberately trying to marginalise Africans. The stats are there to show the teacher pupil ratio whites vs blacks, number of schools per number of citizens, doctor patient ratio, distribution and access to health facilities, etc.. If you SINCERELY believe there was no marginalization and that the issue was simply that the economy was too small then your judgement is warped by the racist lens through which you look at things.

27

oder,

Scotland 07/08/2008 10:16:44
26 Gulliver,Harare

still playing the race card!

you said
If those you claim were truly Zimbabweans they would not have sought to undermine the process that intended to redress the historical injustices of the colonial era.

justification for African racism? ever heard of the term "sins of the father|" as previously said if you operate in the same manner as the early settlers did then you are no better than they were! two wrongs do not make a right,you have mentioned the bible once or twice, now have you read the bit about "forgiveness" or does that not apply to your fellow Zimbabweans?

do you believe that the white Zimbabwean is entitled to equality in Zimbabwe and have the same rights as Black Zimbabweans?

you said

I am glad that you and I agree on one key point which is :
- Zimbabwe was not the Jewel of Africa when Smith handed over power to Mugabe in 1980. You acknowledge resource limitations during Smith's time which is the truth and that's good.

lets just correct a few things here!

various people were present at the time he said
it! you said the food production went up after the removal of the previous government, the "jewel of Africa" appeared under Mugabe according to you! if that is the case all the millions who have ran away from Zimbabwe are lying?

2/3 million Zimbabweans entered South Africa many illegally! out of fear,starvation,deprivation you talk
of marginalization what about these people are they not marginalised? also the hundreds of thousand spread through Botswana,Zambia,Mozambique? none of these events happened under the Smith Government which might not have been popular but certainly shows more responsibility than the present government!

yes! the previous government had resources limitations in their budget! who does not? every country in the world has the very same problem why should the Rhodesia government be different? Mugabe does not spend 20% of the national budget on education nor does any African stat
28

oder,

Scotland 07/08/2008 12:27:38
lets look at this in the "Africa context" 1 child in 6 which at the time was the best in Africa! compared to the worst 1 in 106 (Ethiopia) and not reached by many African states, an yet you continue to ignore any improvement or good done by the previous government your answer simple! their white their wrong! your not judging by race?


marginalization applies to people in all societies not just African and are many reasons for it!

Zimbabwe has had two types of government of government one white and one black it is not racist to compare the pro and cons of both its the only facts we have to go on!


you said

"If you SINCERELY believe there was no marginalization and that the issue was simply that the economy was too small then your judgement is warped by the racist lens through which you look at things."

If you believe that the millions of people that have fled from Zimbabwe under Mugabe are not marginalized then your not only in denial it is your judgement that is warped by the racist lens through which you look at things.

29

Gulliver,

Harare 08/08/2008 11:03:51
I hadn't checked your responses to our discussion. Fine, I agree with you on certain points and I disagree with you on others. Perhaps labelling you a racist because we are disagreeing is not fair- I disagree with my own blood brother on these issues more than I disagree with you!! Ha ha ha!!

You bring up a number of interesting points, and I will respond. However, before going further I would at least want you to tell me what you think about this speech in 2000.
http://www.africasia.com/archive/na/00_06/cover_story.htm

30

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 08:21:23
The combined effects of consecutive droughts (1991-1992), ESAP 1990-94(failed IMF/WORLD BANK policy that sought to open up Zimbabwe's industries to outside competition amongst other things), and marked growth in skills levels (post independence) WHILST the economy shrunk created a wave of socio-economic refugees who were able to migrate to SA and other neighbouring countries at an unprecedented rate. Particularly after SA's independence in 1994.

Political refugees also increased post 2000 but these are fewer in number comparing with those fleeing the economic hardships prevailing in the country. If you look at the 2000 Independence speech you will notice that the president says that "...resources available to sustain the high level of development we have achieved since Independence are diminishing...".

Resources that came by and large from Donor Agencies and Multilateral Support institutions, and partly from running high budget deficits which of course was unsustainable.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.