Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Climbers saved by 60-year-old plane crash

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 May 2009
IT ONCE propelled a mighty bomber to victory on the Dambuster raid, before crashing on a Highland mountain during the post-war peace.
Now, almost 60 years on, the wreckage of a Lancaster bomber has returned to active service – saving the lives of two climbers.

While mountaineering this winter, Ian Parnell and Jon Winter were swept down a gully in Wester Ross by an avalanche. H
urtling towards a 1,200ft drop on Beinn Eighe, they came to a halt when they struck the propeller of the Lancaster bomber, which crashed in 1951 claiming the lives of eight airmen.

Yesterday Mr Parnell, 40, from Sheffield, who has scaled peaks from the Himalayas to Patagonia, explained how he and his climbing partner, Mr Winter, 44, had planned to establish a new route on Beinn Eighe when they were caught in an avalanche last December. "We reached the summit and left some of our stuff so we could abseil down into the corrie to begin the new route. We were roped together and followed a ledge round into Fuselage Gully, named after the wreckage of the plane, and we could see it above us.

"We got about 50ft above the plane when the snow around me started to move. I tried to swim to the side of the gully, but I was swept down by huge slabs of snow. I remember thinking, 'If I hit the propeller, we won't go over the cliff and drop 1,200ft'.

"Jon was hit by the avalanche and buried in it, but the fact we were roped together and me hitting the propeller prevented us from having a long ride down.

"Eventually, the battering of snow finished and I found myself wrapped around the 8ft-long propeller blades. My back was torn and my left arm hurt, but pain never felt so good.

"I remember having this odd thought that I was thankful the plane had crashed because it had saved our lives. The tragic misfortune of those eight airmen was our good luck."

The ill-fated Lancaster TX264 was operating in a maritime reconnaissance role, and had taken off just after 6pm on 13 March, 1951 from RAF Kinloss for Rockall and the Faroe Isles. It was due back at RAF Kinloss around 2:25am the following day.

However, on the return journey the aircraft hit atrocious and freezing weather conditions. Some time after transmitting its last radio message, the Lancaster crashed just 15ft below the summit of Beinn Eighe, and at the top of the almost-inaccessible Far West Gully (now called Fuselage Gully), west of Triple Buttress. It took almost six months for Royal Marines to recover the bodies of all eight crew members.

The wreck of the Lancaster was destroyed by explosives, resulting in debris being strewn down the mountainside. A memorial plaque is fixed to a blade on one of the propellers.

Yesterday, Mr Parnell said: "I have been back to Beinn Eighe twice and recently I completed the new route we had set out to do that December. I called it 'Bruised Violet' after the colour of my badly bruised arm. But my return was an emotional experience. I relived that day and thought of what might have happened had it not been for the fate of those poor airmen."





The full article contains 557 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 May 2009 11:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: World War II
 
1

Louis Catorze,

07/05/2009 11:08:48
"IT ONCE propelled a mighty bomber to victory on the Dambuster raid, before crashing on a Highland mountain during the post-war peace."

So, this is a Dambuster Lancaster is it? Or just really lazy, attention grabbing joiurnalism?

You are supposed to be a newspaper, people come to you for facts, not sensationalist guff.

(This is a post war Lancaster)
2

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 07/05/2009 17:34:11
#1
Perhaps, like bad actors, lousy journalists have to rely on their props.
3

Ewan Oosami,

07/05/2009 19:16:13
It was be easy enough to check whether this particular Lancaster actually participated on the Dambusters raid. It didn't - the aircraft which took part were all serial Number ED8** or ED9**.
They are the facts http://www.thedambusters.org.uk/617squadron.html
4

Logan58,

United States 07/05/2009 20:47:19
I find the article fascinating! It's an interesting mixture of the past and present. I noticed a pleasant difference in your style of writing as opposed to ours in America: the two men were addressed as Mr., which usually isn't done in our papers.
5

Skintman,

Cumbria 01/06/2009 23:23:21
Sir,
Your item on this aircraft by Stephen McGinty , a reporter who obviously does not check his history.

As a relative of one of the pilots who served with 617 on the dams raid i find your reporting on this aircraft very disapointing a basic search would have provided you with the information that this aircraft was never with 617, & in fact was not built till late 1945 therfore making it impossible to be one, ALL letters of the Dams raid aircraft were 'ED' & are well documented for where they all are, This kind of reporting is an insult to the men who lost there lives breaching the Dams, I would suggest you inform your reporters to read a few books! & learn there history before deciding what to write.

6

Larry617,

Canada 01/06/2009 23:25:04
Sir,

I have just read the above article online and find myself stunned and mystified by the statement that this Lancaster was part of the Dambuster Raid. Can you please advise me where this misinformation comes from or from which source you have used?

I feel sure that your story was meant to state that the aircraft was “similar to the aircraft type, which had taken part in the Dambuster raids.” However, as a historian on the Avro Lancaster I feel it is my duty to advise you article is misleading, inaccurate and shows a total disregard for history.

Even the most basic research, either in a library or online, will produce a list of aircraft serial numbers that took part in the Dams Raid and would show that all aircraft came from the “ED” production batch.

The aircraft in this story TX264, was not built until late 1945, being part of the production batch of 19 aircraft built by A.V. Roe & Co. Ltd., Yeadon. The first 11 aircraft were completed at Lancaster Mk.III with Merlin 224 engines: TX263-TX273. Deliveries commenced 8-9-45; completed 31-10-45 (average rate of production, approximately 2 aircraft per week.). The final 8 being completed as Lancastrian Mk. C.IV : TX283-290. Deliveries commenced 8-3-46; completed 2-4-46.

I trust that a correction will be made to this article in order to retract the misinformation and ensure historical facts remain accurate.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the government right to continue with its policy of cutting down quangos?
No, I think their independence means we get a better job
Yes, they are unaccountable and expensive
Only if their work is duplicated or plainly redundant

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.