Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Weather brings 8-mile jams as 'last lorry' blocks bridge



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 February 2008
FOURTEEN people were airlifted from a ferry stranded in the Irish Sea last night as strong winds battered the UK, bringing travel misery for thousands of commuters.
Helicopters were scrambled to rescue four passengers and ten crew from the stricken Riverdance, a roll-on roll-off ferry, which was listing at 45 degrees in 23ft high waves and 70mph gales.

Nine crew members stayed on board to try to restart the ship's engines, but it ran aground on the North Shore of Blackpool beach at about 11pm.

The rescue operation came 12 hours after a lorry was blown over on the Forth Road Bridge, closing the road just before the morning rush-hour and causing eight-mile tailbacks.

Gales of up to 80mph also lashed the west coast of Scotland, forcing the cancellation of flights and ferries, while snow in the north shut roads and several schools.

A 45-year-old lorry driver died on the M6 near Tebay, Cumbria, when his vehicle overturned in gusts of up to 70mph.

In Birmingham, an 11-month-old girl was taken to hospital after strong winds knocked her and her pushchair into a lake. The port of Dover in Kent was closed for part of the day by gusts of up to 60mph, causing disruption to cross-channel services.

In Wales, some 1,000 homes were left without power.

The Riverdance ran into trouble eight miles west of Fleetwood, while making the journey from Warrenpoint in Northern Ireland.

Mark Clark, of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, said the passengers were being airlifted to Blackpool airport, adding: "The weather out there is horrendous at the moment."

He said the ship issued a mayday call at 7:30pm and 90 minutes later several helicopters had begun trying to winch the people to safety.

It is understood a freak wave hit the cargo and passenger ferry, which is owned by Seatruck Ferries, causing cars on the deck to shift to one side.

The Riverdance makes twice-daily crossings between Heysham and Warrenpoint. Its crew comprised four Britons and 15 Poles.

The ship got into difficulties over a bank known as Shell Flat, which causes powerful banking waves.

A spokesman for the RNLI, which was involved in the rescue mission, said: "The conditions are treacherous, with a north-westerly wind blowing at force nine to ten and very high seas.

"The lifeboats are standing by until we know the passengers have been winched off and everyone on board is safe."

Earlier in the day, the Forth Road Bridge was closed northbound and one southbound lane was open only to cars for nearly five hours, causing tailbacks from Fife.

Queues of traffic were also diverted around via the Kincardine Bridge to the west. Some drivers said it had taken four hours to travel between Edinburgh and Fife.

The overturned lorry, which was hit by a 68mph gust of wind, had been the last to cross the bridge before it was closed to high-sided vehicles at 6am.

The vehicle, operated by Kelso-based Olivers Transport, was blown on to the central reservation one minute after warning signs were switched on. The driver escaped unhurt.

Barry Colford, the Forth Estuary Transport Authority's depute general manager, said: "Because of the speed at which the weather changed, there is little that could have been done to prevent it happening."

Meanwhile, a woman was injured in an eight-vehicle pile-up on the M77 at Fenwick in Ayrshire, while the Erskine Bridge over the Clyde was closed to lorries. In Aberdeenshire, heavy snow and fallen trees caused problems for drivers, with the A93 Perth-Braemar road closed at the Glenshee ski centre.

Snow also affected several sections of the A9 between Stirling and Inverness, including near Auchterarder, and around Tomatin and Slochd.

Gergask and Stratherrick primary schools were closed near Inverness.

The roof of St Clement's Church in Aberdeen was ripped off by the winds, causing thousands of pounds worth of damage. Fallen trees also blocked roads in south-west Scotland.

Caledonian MacBrayne cancelled sailings on 18 of its 25 west coast ferry routes and sailings on two other routes were disrupted.

Flights to the Hebrides and other west coast airports were severely affected. Loganair cancelled services between Glasgow and Barra, Benbecula, Islay, Tiree and Campbeltown. A Ryanair flight between Belfast and Prestwick had to be diverted to Edinburgh, while several other Glasgow-Heathrow flights were delayed.

Last night First ScotRail said that a number of services had been disrupted in the west coast network.


WORSE ON THE WAY AS HIGH WINDS SWEEP IN BRINGING ARCTIC CHILL AND BLIZZARDS

SCOTLAND has been warned to batten down the hatches today as winds gusting up to 90mph sweep in blizzards from the north.

Forecasters said up to 4in of snow could fall in frequent and heavy showers, with twice that depth on higher ground.

Roads are likely to be badly affected and schools closed in the north, which is expected to take the brunt of the onslaught.

Pat Boyle, the Met Office's adviser for Scotland, said: "The morning rush-hour could be quite nasty and the winds will not ease off until much later on."

She said that winds were expected to reach between 50mph and 60mph in Edinburgh, with gusts of between 70mph and 80mph in the north-west Highlands and Western Isles, and 90mph in the most exposed places.

Ms Boyle said the storm was caused by an area of low pressure passing north of Scotland towards Norway, which would pull in very cold Arctic air.

She said: "This will bring snow to all levels, not just the hills. North of Perth, it's going to be really bad."

Temperatures are not expected to rise above 2C or 3C, but may feel as low as -6C because of wind chill.

Rob Hutchinson, a forecaster with MeteoGroup, said conditions in the Highlands were likely to be "atrocious".

Mr Hutchinson said: "All of Scotland is going to see some snow at some point.

"The very worst conditions will be in north Scotland. In the Highlands, there will be drifting snow and blizzards, and atrocious conditions."

Highland Council said the conditions were likely to close some of its 220 schools. Two primaries near Inverness were shut yesterday and pupils at two others were sent home early.

The AA has warned drivers to check traffic and weather reports before setting out, and postpone their journeys where possible.

A spokesman said: "Driving conditions will get increasingly tricky."

Milder conditions are expected to return next week.

The full article contains 1098 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 February 2008 12:42 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Weather
 
1

weeshooie1,

Australia 01/02/2008 01:13:12
Well! I certainly don't miss the weather :o(
2

Navvy,

01/02/2008 02:08:58
This on the anniversary opf the sinking of the Princess Victoria in the North Channel
3

Navvy,

01/02/2008 02:11:48
One set of pundits say we can expect this sort of weather increasingly in the years to come

Another set have decided to build another, limited opening hours, Forth Road Bridge in the face of a great deal of opinion in favour of a weather independent tunnel

That is a completely daft decision which will be rued
4

Ayrshire Scot™ ,

01/02/2008 04:04:15
#3 you are spot on. A tunnel is the only solution to this problem.
5

Lanna,

01/02/2008 06:10:09
#1 Weeshooie,
howdy Darl, glad to hear yer keepin warm! :)
6

donald,

glasgow 01/02/2008 06:52:07
How about a tunnel and a bridge and underground trains: just like London
7

Rickie,

01/02/2008 07:04:32
Have I got the right link for the story relating to the headline and picture ?!?
8

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 01/02/2008 07:07:07
A causeway won't get blocked, or catch fire, or be a terrorist target, or cost a fortune. A causeway can be easily expanded, can include rail, will stop flooding in the Forth, will allow shipping through and is immune to bad weather (although fog may slow things down a bit). Neither tunnels nor bridges are so flexible or cheap.

Why was this ferry at sea in this weather?
9

D Napier,

01/02/2008 07:35:56
#8. A causeway is just as susceptible to wind as a bridge.

10

Iain fae Elgin,

London 01/02/2008 07:38:14
I'm not happy; it hardly ever snowed when I lived up in elgin, and now it happens several times a year.

Not happy at all.
11

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 01/02/2008 08:11:52
No. 8 Rules:- How do you propose to build a causeway across the Forth? Will you demolish Ben Nevis and drop the remains in?
12

sam the god,

01/02/2008 08:12:13
so much for global warming then
13

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 01/02/2008 08:27:28
#9 D Napier. A causeway being as wide as you like can have several lanes so an over turned lorry won't stop the flow. Also, wind speeds are lower at ground/sea level than on a high level bridge. Finally it's easier and cheaper to install wind baffles on a causeway.

#11 Nell. Within a mile or two of the causeway site lie five oil shale bings. These have more than enough in them to complete a causeway AND their clearnace will end an eyesore AND reclaim lost farm/housing land.
14

Mugen,

Livingston 01/02/2008 08:36:35
12:
Dont you know this will be global warming as well..
But to make it less likely that we like the idea they now call it climate change, nice bit of spin.

It has to be climate change otherwise Crash Brown can't tax it..
15

scottish person,

paisley 01/02/2008 08:49:25
I cant believe no one has mentioned the thick lorry drivers who think they are immune to all types of weather and speed restrictions. I feel sorry for the driver who lost his life, but there are ample warnings of bad weather and high winds. I am just glad his lorry did not land on some poor innocent car driver. They just keep building lorries bigger and bigger without a thought for other road users. They wreck the road surfaces and scare ordinary car drivers witless, they bully smaller vehicles and do not observe the urban motorway speed limits of 50 mph, they travel at 60 mph everywhere. I have never seen a police car stop a lorry driver for speeding.
16

531 Biker,

01/02/2008 08:51:43
Some of you seem to think there was a point to the public consultation. get over it. There was never going to be anything other than a bridge. You can download the reports from FETA.

Maybe, instead of bitching about what the crossing should be, we should be addressing the real issue here, which is why people choose to use cars than other more sustainable and ecologically less damaging forms of transport.

You do know that in 20 years we'll be complaining about how the new bridge is constantly blocked or grid locked.
17

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 08:55:13
So this causeway: how will it deal with the following?

(a) Shipping.
(b) Tides. The Forth is tidal beyond Stirling and a very considerable amount of water moves up and down the river with the tides (accompanied by powerful tidal streams).
(c) The massive amount of silt transported downstream by the river.
(d) The downstream flow of the river itself.

... and don't get me started on the problems with a tunnel.

18

I Can't Think Of A Name,

sussex 01/02/2008 08:58:21
11
The Dutch managed to build a causeway across the mouth of what used to be the Zuider Zee to keep out the stormy North Sea. Are Scots less able than the Dutch? The resultant now almost freshwater lake is a haven for water sports and has resulted in land reclamation.
19

Alan Goldie,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 09:04:06
.......and our esteemed Scottish Parliament gives the go ahead for another "bridge crossing". If common sense prevails then a "tunnel" would appear to be a more wise solution give the annual upheaval when the weather turns windy. It is quite incredible, we have a collapsing bridge, we stop people paying to go over it to help fund those repairs and at the same time think of building another windswept crossing!! - is it just me
20

Ed_Izmir,

Turkey 01/02/2008 10:07:40
For sure we need another bridge. I advocate another dual carriage way solution, with tolls and queues.

I look forward to the debate over the cost, design and position of the toll booths.

Little Scotland.

BUILD A TUNNEL!!
21

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 01/02/2008 10:22:45
Suerly this is absolute proof of global warming?
22

AllyFraeEmbra,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 11:01:39
#15 - I take it that you're a scared witless female driver of a small ordinary car then? ;-)
23

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 01/02/2008 11:12:57
#17.Plodjfriss.

To deal with your four points:

1. Shipping? A bifurcated lock system.
2. Tides? Tides can be used to generate electricity, or stopped at the barrier, leaving a fresh water lagoon for sports, etc.
3. Silt? Well, most is run-off caused by poor farming/forestry, so should be prevented anyway. Dredgers can clear the rest and the soil used to reclaim land.
4. River flow? Causeway with overspills beneath road level sorts that.

Next questions, please.

#20. Ed. Tunnels? Expensive, terrorist targets, closed by fire, accidents and earthquakes, can't take rail or large loads, no pedestrians or cyclists, approach roads will gobble up scarce land.

Next questions, please.
24

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 01/02/2008 11:15:57
#16 Biker. I think you are right about a bridge being the pre selected choice.

What we should also bitch about is why the new one is to cost 11 times the old one (allowing for inflation). Is it 11 times better?
25

AllyFraeEmbra,

Near the Castle 01/02/2008 11:31:11
#24 - One thing's for sure - it certainly won't last 11 times longer.
26

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 12:00:01
#23: If the tides were stopped at the barrier then to deal with 2 and 4 wouldn't we have to keep the water level upstream from the dam permanently above maximum sea-level, and thus above the current level of the river? This would mean raising the level of the river all the way to Stirling and beyond, which would presumably flood a very large area of low-lying land, possibly including parts of Alloa and Stirling. I'm sure it would be possible to build a causeway and deal with the tidal problems, but wouldn't it create all kinds of problems upriver?

As for allowing the tides to flow back and forth through the causeway and generate energy, I'm a little sceptical about this. My suspicion is that the shape of the firth funnels the tides into a narrow channel, magnifying their effects and causing considerable tidal forces. There must be a huge amount of water slopping up and down the estuary as the tides rise and fall, and I'm not sure how easy it would be to control this with a barrier. I could be completely wrong of course, but it would be interesting to have some figures.

I seem to remember that the Flemings were called in to drain the carse above Stirling two or three centuries ago; they're probably the people we'd have to call in to get an expert opinion nowadays as well.
27

Upbeat,

01/02/2008 12:03:24
15 Scottish person.

What a useles rant ...

So when you next go down to the supermarket, and find nothing there because the " thick lorry drivers" have all stayed at home incase the weather turns nasty, you will be happy ?

Never forget it is people like you that demand every single bit of every cargo that is ever placed on any lorry. Lorries are the taxis of the economy. Road freight is a consequence of consumer demand. Every delivery vehicle is paid for by the cargos it carries. Not one lorry exists for which there is no demand. Without safe roads to run them on, and professional drivers that are prepared - some days - to put their lives on the line , you will quickly become very hungry indeed.
28

Rather of use than fame,

Borders 01/02/2008 12:06:57
I travelled South from Perth via the Bridge, yesterday afternoon, and heard the warnings on the radio saying the bridge was closed to high sided lorries, and the motorway signs saying a similar thing.

There were several of these high lorries ahead of me and behind me, and they all crossed the bridge (fortunately, safely).

But there was no police presence or camera to catch them as they flouted the regulation.
29

MILKYJOE,

01/02/2008 12:21:22
# 8 Rulesbutnotrulers,Federation, not separation

You and your stupid cause way, give it a rest. How does the boats at Rosth get under the causeway?
30

MILKYJOE,

01/02/2008 12:23:06
#15 Grow and brain, you idiot. So all lories should be stopped, because of weather, what an embarrasement you are.
31

Robert Wiener,

Naples 01/02/2008 12:57:11
The evidence is in. A tunnel, although it may cost more and take longer to build, is the correct answer to the periodic high winds that tie up traffic and cause accidents.
32

MilkyBoke,

01/02/2008 13:06:23
# 23 Rulesbutnotrulers

Has a lagoon now in the forth, talk about living in reality. Will this lagoon, have a tropical climate caused by the causeway?
33

fritigern,

Inverness 01/02/2008 13:08:47
#16 There are many good reasons why so many people use public transport only as a last resort. It is expensive, it can be infrquent, it may not go where you want it to, you have to wait in the foulest of weather in the open (do you think Brown or Cameron have ever waited at a bus stop?), it is infested with neds and other assorted anti-social elements. We don't live in barracks (tho' doubtless the Socialists and Greens are planning this), so why travel in barracks?
34

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 01/02/2008 13:13:03
#29 Milky Jo

Causeway will be upstream of Rosyth due to river bed conditions and so will not affect Rosyth traffic.

Lagoons need not be tropical; think of a large lake if that helps.

This idea has been thought through, not just thought up!

Any (sensible) questions, please?

#31 A tunnel has far too many drawbacks compared to a simple causeway with bifurcated shipping locks.
35

MILKYJOE,

01/02/2008 14:07:56
#34 So now your moving the 'crossing' down stream, so we need new roads, scrap the old road links, move a few houses etc.

'This idea has been thought through' Yes by you, not anyone in the engineering world though, a bridge or tunnel was the only viable options, most people could see that.
36

Upbeat,

01/02/2008 15:10:18
Two more points.

Across Europe there is a standard height for LGV's. This height is agreed and is the practical minimum to provide clearance in tunnels,and under bridges, overhead wires trees etc. The standard allows goods trailers to be lifted onto , and transported along rail lines. The height is 4 metres.

In Britain we have and continue to accept vehicles up to 15 ft 3 ins. (approx 4 mtrs 70cm) in use.

Not surprising therefore that we have more vehciles toppling over in strong winds, than anywhere in Europe.

Had the authorities wanted to address this problem it could be done by regulating the maximum height of goods vehicles, and banning EMPTY and LIGHTLY LOADED high sided vehicles from exposed routes.

Not all lorries, even curtain sided ones, have cargos that are loaded high, or are particularly top heavy . Steel, Building materials, and engineering components, tinned foods and other dense cargos etc are quite stable even in high winds. If any lorry is blown over it is usually because the driver and vehicle owner have failed to think ahead, and because the British transport regulators have caved in to demands from the Industry to continue to permit some operators to be greedy by using exceptionally high vehicles.
37

Miss Jean Brodie,

01/02/2008 15:16:17
Hope we dinnae get any bad weather !
38

Chairman Gordon,

Bannockburn 01/02/2008 15:29:15
I was going to suggest dumping all the Nationalists in the Forth to build a causeway, but that wouldn't create a big enough obstruction to moor a dinghy to.
39

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 01/02/2008 15:30:37
#35 Milky Joe.

A causeway will require LESS damage to existing homes etc than either the new bridge or the tunnel. Go and study the map!

Neither a tunnel nor a bridge will protect against rising sea levels. The Thames has a barrier and that's already been raised dozens of times. What has the Forth?

Any (sensible) points, please?
40

Chairman Gordon,

Bannockburn 01/02/2008 15:40:49
#39-
Go back to the Scotsman edition of 8th April last year, and read the story "Volcanic island under the Firth of Forth".
Then come back and tell us why you think a causeway would be feasible.
41

Brisssac,

Glasgow 01/02/2008 15:50:28
The lorry was empty, which bridge
officials said may have made it more prone to being blown over.
Such incidents on the bridge are rare, with yesterday’s only the second in more than a decade. In the previous incident, in 2002, a lorry driver was left hanging over the bridge parapet by his seat belt after his vehicle was blown over by a freak gust. No restrictions were in force at the time.
Although such incidents are rare – yesterday’s was only the second in a decade – it is the second time in a month that the bridge has seen traffic chaos.
It was completely closed on 9 January after sections of a painting platform above the carriageways were torn down by winds reaching 81mph. The crossing is not normally closed to all traffic until winds reach 85mph.
Windshielding – panels bordering the carriageways to protect vehicles – cannot be fitted to the bridge because it would put too much strain on the structure. However, it will form part of the new Forth road bridge, a feature that is expected to virtually eliminate the need for traffic restrictions during strong winds after it is opened in eight years’ time.
Murdo Fraser, deputy leader of the Scottish Conservatives, yesterday called for an urgent review of procedures for allowing high-sided vehicles to cross the Forth Road Bridge to try to prevent a repeat of yesterday’s incident.
A spokesman for the Forth Estuary Transport Authority (Feta), which runs the bridge, said: “At 6am there was a sudden increase in wind speed. Bridge controllers immediately changed the signs and closed the tolls to high-sided vehicles, but the last lorry to go through, at 6:01am, was hit by a 68mph gust halfway across the bridge.
“Two heavy recovery vehicles and a crane were quickly on site, but continuing high winds hampered efforts to recover the overturned lorry safely.”
“The recovery team eventually took advantage of a lull in the wind to pull the lorry upright and reverse it off the bridge, shielded on three sides by heavy
42

MILKYJOE,

01/02/2008 16:12:55
# 39 So now the causeway is kind of hybrid crossin which will create a lagoon, as well as aid future sea level rises..etc What a brilliant idea, so we just stick that on the map that was shown and we are done..Great.. where is the petition sign me up.

You are an embarrasement.
43

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 16:31:21
The reason a tunnel is not on the cards is politicians can't point at it in the opening pictures same way as a bridge. Let's get it built before we have 3 hour drive around delays every day when current bridge declared unsafe.
44

urban poacher,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 16:43:18
there was an article about building a causeway in Scotsman last year and there were a few public presentations. It works really well in Netherlands. No problems with tides, high winds or silting. Zuider Zee now called IJsselmeer has been successful. Cheaper than bridge or tunnel already a auseway with power generation is being considered for Bristol Channel. There are causeways in Western Isles and Orkneys. professional engineers have designed them in more difficult places than Forth.
45

Fidelio,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 16:54:04
Never mind building another bridge - knock down the existing one and keep the bloody Fifers in Fife.
Stinky place anyway.
46

Rednose Harry,

Wallasey 01/02/2008 17:06:34
Where does 'elf 'n safety figure in respect of lorries,ships etc operating in extreme conditions?We had our bin lorries grounded on one occasion sue to a half inch of snow which had disappeared within a couple of hours.
Perhaps they are not so keen in Scotland.
47

Rednose Harry,

Wallasey 01/02/2008 17:08:33
Where does 'elf 'n safety figure in respect of lorries,ships etc operating in extreme conditions?We had our bin lorries grounded on one occasion due to a half inch of snow which had disappeared within a couple of hours.
Perhaps they are not so keen in Scotland.
48

subrosa,

01/02/2008 21:58:32
# 47

My binmen have come every Thursday at 730am give or take 2 minutes for the past 16 years without one day's absence.
49

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 01/02/2008 22:43:35
Who wrote and who edited this?

The headline reads, "Weather brings 8-mile jams as 'last lorry' blocks bridge" so I start reading, only to find a story about rescues at sea - leading me to think that the lorry must've fallen from a bridge..........into the Irish Sea.

So I read and I read and aha! Halfway down the page I come across, "Earlier in the day, the Forth Road Bridge was closed northbound and one southbound". So the lorry was on the Forth bridge?

But, as I read on, the paragraph mentions 'lorry' nary a time. So I keep reading. Next paragraph: "Queues of traffic were also diverted around via the Kincardine Bridge to the west." O......kay, was the lorry on the Kincardine bridge then? Or maybe the lorry was in the water somewhere between the Forth bridge and the Kincardine bridge? Who knows? There's still no mention of a lorry in this paragraph.

So I keep reading and I'm rewarded at last. The next paragraph begins, "The overturned lorry, which was hit by a 68mph gust of wind, had been the last to cross the bridge". Finally! But where was the lorry? Forth bridge? Kincardine bridge? Maybe it leapt off the Forth bridge in an attempt to reach the Kincardine bridge, failed and drifted around to the Irish Sea where the driver had to be rescued?

My goodness! If I want to read nonsense English like this, I'll (gulp) read the transcript of a politician's speech. Please, please, Scotsman - stop allowing your staff's ten-year-olds to write reports.
50

Katty,

Bannockburn 02/02/2008 00:28:04
49 John Blackley Winter Gardens

For heavens sake John do not criticize their pieces. It is only 2 weeks since the Herald closed down the political blogs. why?
Some Bloggers were pointing out the rubbish articles. So they went in the huff.
51

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 02/02/2008 07:34:40
#40 Chairman G.

Probably this is too late to tell you that the causeway would be sited upstream of Rosyth and away from sea bed problems.

#42 Milky Joe.

Well too late for you, but do learn to spell embarrassment, please.
52

Chairman Gordon,

Bannockburn 02/02/2008 15:25:02
#51 Rules-
But that would prevent ships using both Grangemouth docks, and RN ships resupplying the RNAD at Crombie.
53

suz,

03/02/2008 13:43:03
I know I'm late to the party but I just noticed the headline for this story-'last lorry' blocks bridge-of course it was the last lorry-the lorry blocked the bridge!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.