Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Home Secretary attacks London Mayor Boris Johnson over police chief's departure



View Video
Download Video

Video

London Mayor Boris Johnson on Sir Ian Blair's resignation
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 October 2008
London Mayor Boris Johnson has been attacked by Home Secretary Jacqui Smith over his involvement in the departure of Britain's most senior police officer.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair said yesterday he could not continue without the support of the Mayor.

Sir Ian said Mr Johnson wasted no time in using a meeting on his first day in power as Police Authority chairman on Wednesday to oust him.

Mr Johnson praised the senior officer's lasting and distinguished service, but said the force needed fresh leadership.

Ms Smith said deputy commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson would take over as acting head when Sir Ian stood down on December 1.

She said: "I pay tribute to Sir Ian for the massive reductions in crime which his leadership at the Met has overseen, and his continuing efforts to tackle gun, gang and knife crime.

"Sir Ian can be proud of his contribution locally and nationally."

Later, speaking on BBC's Question Time, she said: "There's a process in place that the Mayor chose not to respect.

"What is important when you are both choosing and when you're supporting somebody that you're asking to do a job like that is that you keep party politics out of it. You need to work alongside people and frankly you should put some time and effort into that.

"The Mayor said on the first day in his job he didn't feel he had confidence in Sir Ian and that's why he took the decision to resign."

She also levelled criticism at the national media for their attacks on Sir Ian saying: "We can't expect people to resign because there's a story about them on the front page of the Daily Mail."

When she was asked why she had not tried harder to dissuade Sir Ian from resigning, Ms Smith told the programme: "When someone comes and says to you they want to offer their resignation I don't think it would be right to persuade him against what he had decided to do to stay."

The sudden departure threw the smouldering tensions between Sir Ian and the capital's new Tory administration wide open.

There has been constant speculation since Mr Johnson's election in May that Sir Ian's days in power were numbered.

Sir Ian has been dogged by controversy – the most recent claims involving contracts awarded to a close friend and a race row among senior officers.

The senior officer admitted the inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes was the force's greatest challenge since the Stephen Lawrence inquiry.

But it was the changing political landscape in London that finally finished off the one-time darling of New Labour.

Former London Mayor Ken Livingston, a close ally of Sir Ian, said he regretted the "political" decision.

He said: "This makes the role of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner much more political.

Also yesterday policing minister Tony McNulty hit out at opposition criticism of Sir Ian, saying some of the comments "defy belief".

Speaking on Sky News, Mr McNulty said: "The hysterical and overly political nature of some of the comments by national opposition spokespeople really does defy belief and I think is actually quite strange and shows a profound lack of knowledge of policing in London.

"We know clearly there are a whole range of issues that Sir Ian was facing... but to simply not even note the contribution of this man to policing in London in quite the way that Chris Huhne and Dominic Grieve have done I think shows both of them ill-fit to be relative spokespersons for their party."

Following several hours of fevered speculation yesterday, Sir Ian finally announced his resignation with a measured statement.

Defending his record at the top of the Met he said it was the duty of the Commissioner to lead the force "through good times and bad".

But he said: "Without the Mayor's backing I do not think I can continue in the job."

Sir Ian added: "I am resigning not because of any failures of my service and not because the pressures of the office and the many stories that surround it are too much.

"I am resigning in the best interests of the people of London and of the Metropolitan Police Service.

"However, at a meeting on Wednesday the new mayor made clear, in a very pleasant and determined way, that he wished there to be a change of leadership at the Met."

Mr Johnson will chair his first meeting of the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), the Met's board of governors, at City Hall on Monday.

Mr Johnson paid tribute to Sir Ian's record but said it was time for "new leadership" at the top of the force.

He said: "He can be very proud of his record in helping to keep millions of Londoners safe from harm.

"However, there comes a time in any organisation when it becomes clear that it would benefit from new leadership and new clarity of purpose.
"I believe that time is now."

The full article contains 843 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Conway,

03/10/2008 11:04:51
Can someone correct me I thought Ian Blair was Englands most senior police officer not the "Britains most senior officer" Scotlands legal system is seperate from Englands.
2

inkster,

03/10/2008 11:35:34
This post seems to be a home office labour political appointment and has to be approved by the British Queen. Reassuring to see that a local mayor can sack him.
3

bluehead,

edinburgh 03/10/2008 11:38:09
I have no time for Jacqui smith,like the rest of the labour mob she is a washout,but cannot help but agree with her regarding the police chief,this Boris guy should have nothing to do with such decisions,there are bodies set up to handle such matters,and as everyone knows when you mix police with politicians,
there will only be catastrophe
it must be the wonder of the century that this Boris guy got the job as mayor
4

NorT,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 11:38:14
Blair should have gone months ago. He will not be missed.
5

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 11:48:44
From what I cam gather, it was not just Boris Johnson who had little confidence in Ian Blair. This feeling seemed to be widespread among the Met and people of London. In this sense it was probably inevitable that he would go.
6

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 03/10/2008 11:53:17
#3 wrote:

"as everyone knows when you mix police with politicians,
there will only be catastrophe"

Precisely why Blair should never have been there in the first place. He was a Labour stooge who greatly politicised the police. This was long overdue.
7

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 03/10/2008 12:00:04
Blair's position had become increasingly untenable, with the ongoing Menezes inquiry, and with allegations of jobs for the boys appearing in the tabloid press.
Never one to look a gift horse in the mouth, Jacqui Smith has had the need to sack him taken away from her, and been able to blame a Tory Mayor for it to boot!
8

Alan B,

03/10/2008 12:17:09
Ian Blair was dreadful.

I laugh at labour saying Boris has politised the police commisioners job as labour already had made the position political with Ian Blair.

Labour are playing a very dangerous game here. Ken Livingston was completely contradictory on everything he said during a tv interview last night.

At the end of the day it is important that the major has a police chief he can rely on.
9

John south of Soutra,

03/10/2008 12:17:59
Jacqui Smith gave a very poor performance on Question Time last night, Janet Street Porter was more in touch with reality and how people actually feel about the situation.
IMO Blair should have resigned a couple of years ago and the Menezes affair and all the other allegations of croneyism really left him in an untenable position
10

Alan B,

03/10/2008 12:18:33
#Mad Jock

There was alos the issue of bank handers. Awarding contracts to a fiend etc. Good article about it in the metro this morning.
11

Alan B,

03/10/2008 12:20:05
If you are going to devolve power and have a major then you have to let the mayor make decisions like this.

Labour have started the devolution process but seem unable to managed it as they want to control and power over everything.

We have seen the same in scotland with their vindictive attitude towards scotland.
12

JayDeeTee,

03/10/2008 12:33:07
#9. That's because she is a very poor politician. Even a young lad in the audience was more in touch than she was. Even Charlie boy sounded like he was more in touch than she. Liebour are a joke lot and the sooner they are booted well out the better.
13

JayDeeTee,

03/10/2008 12:44:36
And I wonder who will replace Blair. How about the guy who accused him of racism?
14

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 13:03:32
Whether or not you are a fan of Boris Johnson or his predecessor Ken Livingstone, I feel that the introduction of a real Mayor in London has been a good thing and I would advocate a similar post for all councils.

If people in London are not happy with something they know who to blame and can vote accordingly. In local elections those who vote (those that bother) usually just vote for the party they want to vote for irrespective of the local issues or councillors. I am sure that both of the mayors got votes from people who may not vote for their respective parties but voted on who they thought was the best person for the job.

Also there must be millions of people who know that Boris Johnson is Mayor of London but don't know who their local councillor or even convener is.
15

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 13:23:45
8 Alan B
I don't think Labour will worry over any comments by Ken Livingstone. I know that he has been readmitted to the Labour party but I don't think people really associate him with the party after his past confrontations with them. Even when he was in the party initially he was always thought of as a maverick.
16

Finnzz,

Offshore 03/10/2008 13:58:06
This headline "London Mayor Boris Johnson has been attacked by Home Secretary" had me worried for a minute.

I had a vision of Boris being clouted around the head by a large-chested matronly figure with a handbag.

Mind you, Boris would probably enjoyed that. What with his Eton background.
17

Alan B,

03/10/2008 14:22:47
#14 Ugly George

Agree. It would be a good idea to seriously consider mayors for a greater glasgow and edinburgh.
18

Alan B,

03/10/2008 14:35:17
#15 Ugly George

It is not about labour being worried. Labour were taking a similar line to Ken.

It is more who the public, particularly in London see as right in this issue.

Labour are needlessly picking a fight with Boris. Boris will make a mess of something at sometime. Labour should choose its time properly.

The public could very well see this as:
- labour defending a police commission with little credibility. Even the police commission had a no confidence motion passed against him.
- by arguing that the tories are politising this are made to look like hypocrites. Labour with Ian Blair were very political.
-From a scotland point of view we can see how labour find it difficult to work with a devolved institution when they are not run by labour. Quite clearly you cannot have a situation where the mayor has no confidence in Ian Blair.

Ken being the labour major of london while a maveric is almost still the official labour opposition to Boris and does effectively speak for labour. As such remarks made that

- people that do not suppor Ian Blair are racist and sexist is ridiculous. People will just think what planet are labour on
- Ken said the most important relationship for the mayor is with the commissioner. And a good relationship is very important to the operation of mayor. As such it is simply ridiculous to state then that the government should have pushed for Ian Blair to stay when his relationship with Boris had broken down.
19

vimto,

03/10/2008 16:03:37
Blair should of been removed years ago,well done Boris!
20

Matt there,

Somewhere 03/10/2008 16:08:25
Perhaps the mistake was in giving Blair the job in the first place
21

cramond1,

Bognor 03/10/2008 16:16:07
Well done Boris. And good luck with the new airport. The Thames will be a great transport hub as it was in centuries past.
That Blair can go and buy a 5 million + house somewhere for all I care. He will always be remembered for killing terrorist-look-alike Jean Charles de Menezes. These incidents/murders make Britain look sick to the world outside. Can you imagine his memoirs - lick that pencil now - entitled "Not Guilty"?
Does his wife Mrs Blair have an income?
22

Sassi,

03/10/2008 18:52:29
Shouldn't the headline be "Conservatives pick fight with Westminster"?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.