Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Presidential candidates unite behind bailout plan



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 September 2008
Presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain found themselves in rare agreement, each demanding the Bush administration's unprecedented 700 billion US dollar bailout for US financial institutions be subject to independent oversight and guarantees their top executives not be rewarded.
While sounding tough, both senators have assumed positions on the bailout that appear likely to match the shape of the programme when it emerges from Congress.

It appeared certain to win approval given the possible consequences – the collapse of t
he US and global economies.

A new poll found that Americans approved the bailout by a nearly two-to-one margin and saw Mr Obama as best able to deal with the mounting financial crisis.

The Pew Research Centre for the People and the Press survey, conducted between Friday and Monday, showed 57% of voters believed the government was doing the right thing, while 30% opposed the bailout.

The survey also found 47% believed Mr Obama, a Democrat, would best handle the financial meltdown as opposed to 35% who favoured Mr McCain, a Republican, in that role.

Mr Obama interrupted his preparations for Friday's first debate with Mr McCain to tell reporters he could not support the bailout without those assurances as well as two others – a payback to American taxpayers who are financing the bailout and help for US homeowners facing mortgage foreclosure.

He also lashed out at President George Bush for what he called the administration's "my-way-or-the-highway intransigence" in putting forward a plan that would have given Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson total discretion – without outside oversight – to use the huge fund to buy up bad investments of banks and other financial institutions.

Mr McCain also held a news conference, his first in more than a month, to declare that the rescue package would cost each American household 10,000 dollars and to demand that the programme be fully transparent.
"This can't be cobbled together behind closed doors," the four-term Arizona senator said.

And he insisted, as he had earlier, that the programme sponsored by Mr Bush, a fellow Republican, would ensure that "taxpayers' dollars don't line the pockets of executives".

Mr McCain and Mr Obama faced reporters after the Senate Banking Committee had grilled Mr Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke about the bailout plan. Mr Bernanke warned the panel that the economy would plunge into recession without quick action.

Neither Mr McCain nor Mr Obama have left the campaign trail to return to Washington to address the crisis.

Earlier, Mr Obama warned that the deepening financial crisis and likely bailout meant he could be forced to delay expansive spending programmes outlined during his campaign for the White House.

In an interview with NBC television, Mr Obama said he would have to study what happens to the United States' tax revenues before making decisions on budgeting for his promised initiatives on national health care, education, energy and other concerns.

Still, he insisted he would move forward on tax cuts for Americans earning less than 250,000 dollars annually.




The full article contains 511 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 September 2008 6:03 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: US elections
 
1

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA: for more War VOTE McCain 24/09/2008 17:25:21
If either Obama or McCain had any balls . They would reject this bail-out.

The Feds are bailing-out greedy criminals in Wall Street with our Tax dollars.. Let them go broke.

And the mass tide of stupid human mediocrity, that live in the US, just sit there and cannot understand that they are getting ripped off, and so are their children and grand children.

But public memory is short lived, and in a few weeks a new story will hit the US TV's, like Lindsay Lohan is not gay, but she and Britney Spears are lovers .

DuHhhh.

Shroom time dude,

GC

GC
2

mike - across the pond,

GC 24/09/2008 20:47:21
speaking of short memories...

do you remember the last time that the federal government bailed out banks?

look up RTC (resolution trust corporation)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_Trust_Corporation
this was a product of Carter era banking practices that came home to roost in the mid-80's

care to guess how much the assets THEY liquidated were worth?

$394B

acting like what they are proposing now is something NEW is absolutely LUDICROUS

we've had shoddy banking practices before... the banks go nuts... the fed swoops in scoops up the bad debt, sells it off, and away we go AGAIN...

its cyclical, and absolutely amazing that nobody remembers a short 20 years before when it happened last time...
3

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 24/09/2008 21:49:08
I don't think either one of the candidates are behind this the way it was written. I know McCain wants to stop the debate to work on this problem, and Obama doesn't. We'll see.. Harry Reid, the undertaker, wants the debates to go on, so Obama is pulling the follow the old party line again, while McCain is country first.
There are too many things that have to be changed, dropped and added to this bill before either party will pass it.
4

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 24/09/2008 23:35:01
McCain wants to chicken out of the debate because only 2 weeks ago he was praising how deregulation had done great things for the economy and claimed it is in great shape.

Country first?? He doesn't have a clue.
5

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 25/09/2008 02:20:10
On McCain's suspension of his campaign:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/24/after_mccain_cancels_letterman.html
6

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 25/09/2008 04:36:48
LHTT.. McCain isn't backing out. As a matter of fact he offered to have 10 Town Hall debates.. but Chicken Little Obama said no.
You have no idea what you are talking about. He wasn't praising deregulation like the way you say, he signed onto a bill to have more regulation in 2003, and 2005 on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, because he see what was happening. The Democraps stalled that bill, bogged it down and it never passed.
I wish, for once, you would read before you opened you mouth with your lies and garbage.
It is the fault of the Democraps all the way back to 1992. But there is plenty of fault to go around.
Why don't you criticize your own country, something I am sure you know more about and care about, instead of being part of the problem with lies about my country and goings on in the US, and making it up as you go along?.
7

Conan,

Chile 25/09/2008 06:21:30
Quite correct Lynne - I have followed this closely. the fact is that:-

1. President Clinton (the chap who brought you 9-11 as his DoJ/FBI/CIA and others were not permitted to exchange information with each other ... in any case, his Attorney General (that galoot, Reno) was too busy chasing children to send them back to Cuba, or killing of Branch Dividians at Waco to be bothered with the 9-11 plotters or OBL - I digress) signed the Finance Modernization Act of 1999 which put in place all that was needed for this perfect storm of financial idiocy to take root.

2. Later, once the entire financing house of cards was clearly straining by 2003-4 the Bush Adminstration proposed an entire raft of changes and tweaks to the various financing laws and regulations which were presented before the Senate Banking Committee. On a straight Party-Line vote the DEMOCRATS (i.e., idiots) chose to REJECT all of these proposals and therefore left things as they were .... thus setting the stage for this train wreck.

3. The Democrats obtained control of the US House and Senate in 2006 and have DONE NOTHING since then, held no hearing, proposed no changes, to deal with the obvious disaster looming. This occured because they were (and remain) so totally blinded by their hatred of Bush and everything to do with Bush - sort of like the the chap who is choking his hated enemy to death on the train tracks ... oblivious to the Flying Scotsman bearing down on him at 95 mph!

4. That said, this proposal is not a solution - merely the opportuinity for the US taxpayer to once again bend over and hold their ankles while the stinking rich yet again have their way.
8

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 25/09/2008 06:52:17
Lynne

For your edification:-

http://poligazette.com/2008/09/17/john-mccain-against-regulation-before-he-was-for-it/

You ask "Why don't you criticize your own country"

....You have no idea which is my country and furthermore how would you know if I did or didn't?

I may ask you the same question as I've seen some offensive posts by you about other countries.

I ask you the same question, why don't you criticise YOUR own country?
9

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 25/09/2008 09:01:15
This crisis was caused by political correctness being forced on the mortgage lending industry in the Clinton era.

Before the Democrats' affirmative action lending policies became an embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in 1992, a majority-Democratic Congress "mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains."

Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on banks to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton's secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated Fannie Mae for racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low- to moderate-income borrowers by the year 2001.

Instead of looking at "outdated criteria," such as the mortgage applicant's credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks were encouraged to consider nontraditional measures of credit-worthiness, such as having a good jump shot.
Threatening lawsuits, Clinton's Federal Reserve demanded that banks treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to qualify for a mortgage. That isn't a joke -- it's a fact.

When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches, political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices.

In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action to the financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed the Clinton administration's affirmative action lending policies as one of the "hidden success stories" of the Clinton administration, saying that "black and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest level ever recorded."

Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issu
10

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 25/09/2008 09:02:59
continued...Conan Chile

Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail the moment the housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn't get out of their loans by selling their houses.

A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted, food-stamp-backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative action time-bomb and now it's gone off.

In Bush's first year in office, the White House chief economist, N. Gregory Mankiw, warned that the government's "implicit subsidy" of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified borrowers, was creating a huge risk for the entire financial system.

Rep. Barney Frank denounced Mankiw, saying he had no "concern about housing." How dare you oppose suicidal loans to people who can't repay them! The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were "under heavy assault by the Republicans," but these entities still had "important political allies" in the Democrats.

Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class taxpayers are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats' two most important constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare recipients.

Political correctness had already ruined education, sports, science and entertainment. But it took a Democratic president with a Democratic congress for political correctness to wreck the financial industry.


11

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 25/09/2008 11:21:51
That diatribe is irrelevant. What was right in 1992 maybe was not at a later date.

The Bush crowd has eight years to fix it. Why didn't they?

12

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 25/09/2008 14:17:49
LHTT..

I said there was blame to go around, and when McCain co-signed a bill to regulate what he saw was going on, the Democraps stalled it,bogged it down and it did not pass. And Barney Frank was protesting "no problems". Like I said you don't know how my gov't works..how a bill is introduced and passed.. so instead of proving you are a fool.. shut up, go look it up, and while you are at it...look up pork, because that is what happens to most bills.
13

mike - across the pond,

lhtt 25/09/2008 15:47:53
the PROBLEM is...

once a law is in place it is YEARS before the full impact is felt....

in THIS case, 10 years before those who CARED (certainly NOT the democrats who poo-poohed the concerns of GREENSPAN and company) began to see the cracks....

it is the DUTY of the lawmakers (congress) to update the law to not allow the dam to burst...

CONGRESS has dropped the ball... this MAY be congresses "october surprise"... but that would be predicated on the american people keeping their eye on the ball long enough to hold CONGRESSES feet to the fire...

I'm not holding my breath on THAT one....
14

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 25/09/2008 19:01:27
mike-across-the-pond

me neither
15

57Nomad,

california 25/09/2008 22:33:28
#8lhtt

lhtt said:

".You have no idea which is my country and furthermore how would you know if I did or didn't?"

We don't have any idea what your country is. You have a section in the dialog box that says, "Location:"
Your location says Queensland. Most would conclude that you are Australian. Is this not the case? If it isn't then please tell us.

I, like everyone on this forum, knows that you have one single response for everything. It's the fault of the USA. Did you think no one noticed? So, tell us, where are you from?
16

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 26/09/2008 04:43:04
McCain blamed for sabotaging bail out:

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hGUAaIr6psAn4fWoelJuFsjPo7XA

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.