Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Legal battle over what voters can wear to the polls



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 October 2008
SUE Nace thought election volunteers were joking when they told her she would have to remove her T-shirt to vote in the US presidential primary last spring.
But it was no laughing matter to the poll workers-turned-fashion police, who said Nace's Barack Obama shirt was inappropriate electioneering – and made her cover the writing.

Now, a political fight over what voters can wear to the polls is headed
to court in Pennsylvania – the Republican Party favouring a dress code, the Democrats opposed.

Fears have been raised that the lack of rules could open the door to all kinds of questionable displays – even, one Republican leader suggested, something as outlandish as a musical hat.

To the Democrats, voters should be free to express themselves. They fear a dress code could scare away some new voters.

The political showdown was triggered by a Pennsylvania Department of State memo advising counties last month that voters' attire doesn't matter as long as the "voter takes no additional action to attempt to influence other voters".

Because the memo is not legally binding, some counties have kept past restrictions on clothing and political buttons.

But two Pittsburgh elections officials brought a court action to have the memo rescinded. Their lawsuit warned that if the memo stands, "nothing would prevent a partisan group from synchronising a battalion of like-minded individuals... to descend on a polling place, presenting a domineering, united front, certain to dissuade the average citizen who may privately hold different beliefs."

This fight over the interpretation of a state law designed to shield the polls from partisan electioneering could determine which candidate's supporters might be turned away from the polls in the battleground state of Pennsylvania, where Democrats have benefited from a surge in voter registration this year, with young adults (18-24) making up the largest group of new registrants.

A poll released last week, by Quinnipiac University, showed Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama, pulling percentage points ahead of Republican John McCain in the state, and Democratic Party Chairman TJ Rooney said Republican support for the dress code is a partisan effort to scare away new voters.

"To go (to the polls] and engage in an expression of democracy, then be accosted by the fashion police is a form of voter intimidation," he said.

The state Republican Party says Democratic Governor Ed Rendell's administration crafted a partisan memo that would open the door to abuses.

"The first thing would be a button or a shirt, and maybe the next thing would be a musical hat," said Republican chairman Robert Gleason, who called a news conference in support of dress codes.



The full article contains 449 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 October 2008 9:34 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: US elections
 
1

2dogs in D.C.,

05/10/2008 02:28:59
Complete hogwash,and will not stand. Dress code, my butt.
2

Lanna,

05/10/2008 06:11:35
What a sorry state of affairs this is. Let them all wear black.
3

Sandi,

San Diego 05/10/2008 16:19:29
The point of it all is that the law forbids campaigning within a specific distance from the entrance to the polling place. In California, the distance is 100 feet, it varies in all the states. In no State is it legal to take campaign material into the polling place. This is not new and has been contested by both parties in the past, but the law has always prevailed.

The concern now is that the Obama campaign supposedly has so many university-age potential voters, many of whom wear tee shirts with Obama symbols, etc. on them.

IMO, if you're adult enough to vote, then you should be able to understand the rules pertaining to the action of voting. The rules are there to ensure fairness for all the candidates and protection for all voters from harrassment, something the Obama campaign has trouble understanding. We do not have caucuses in the general election and so it's more difficult for the Obama campaign to put pressure on voters to vote the way they want them to.
4

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 05/10/2008 16:26:39
The USA, the land of Freedom...
Yeah right
5

ReadingPublic-2,

Northern Wisconsin 05/10/2008 16:39:21
Absolute nonsense. Shows how far the PC Liberals/Conservatives have come. Both as bad as each other, we need guns at the polls like the old days in Chicago.
6

Kelvino,

- NY 05/10/2008 16:41:22
Infamous "Moose and Flying Squirrel" will be attired in their characteristic furs, minus tell-tale flag lapel pins, "Wasilla Mamas" insignia and "White Man's Burden" tee shirts. A REAL photo op !


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.