Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hesitant Hillary Clinton refused to leave campaign stage



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 June 2008
HILLARY Clinton showed no sign of suspending her presidential campaign in a speech which was widely seen as the former first lady flexing her power and influence.
Speaking at Baruch College in her home city of New York, she urged her "18 million" supporters to visit her campaign website and share their views on what she should do next as she said she would be "making no decisions" last night.

But she did sa
y that the Democratic Party was "stronger and more vibrant" as a result of Mr Obama's campaign.

Mrs Clinton said her rival had "inspired so many Americans to care about politics".

She told cheering supporters: "Now the question is, 'Where do we go from here?' And given how far we've come, and where we need to go as a party, it's a question I don't take lightly.

"This has been a long campaign and I will be making no decisions tonight."

Earlier, she said: "I understand that a lot of people are asking, 'What does Hillary want?'

"Well, I want what I have always fought for in this whole campaign."

She said she wanted to end the war in Iraq, wanted to turn the troubled US economy around and wanted universal healthcare in America.

She said she also wanted those who voted for her "to be respected, to be heard".

The tone and content of her speech was seen by some political pundits as a final refusal by Mrs Clinton to leave the stage.

Earlier, speaking to a much smaller, less-animated crowd of supporters in New Orleans, Louisiana, Mr McCain said Mr Obama would be a "formidable" opponent but criticised him for offering "the wrong change" which "looks not to the future but to the past for solutions that have failed us before and will surely fail us again".

But his speech was noted more for the stark visual contrast it presented when compared with the much bigger, livelier rally held by Mr Obama than for his criticism of the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee.




The full article contains 348 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 June 2008 9:14 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: US elections
 
1

Ninian Reid,

Edinburgh 04/06/2008 11:53:11
Each day of head-in-the-sand , ostrich-like stubbornness can only help one man: John McCain. Hillary's fought the good fight. Now it's time to gently, stoically pass on the baton - not to rap poor Obama over the knuckles with it. Surrendering to the inevitable would be a dignified gesture , and also a thoroughly Democratic one.
2

Griffe,

04/06/2008 14:10:58
Face the truth, Hillary, you have lost! Get out of the way and let Obama & McCain go head-to-head for the votes of the US electorate.
3

Dr Arthur Frederick Ide,

Radcliffe, Iowa USA 04/06/2008 15:07:20
As a lifelong Democrat, and former chair of the Hardin Iowa Democratic Party, I could never vote for Obamam. McCain is better: he has more international exposure and experience. He has more saavy. Obama has only hate.
4

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 04/06/2008 15:48:04
#3..you are right...but you would never know it by the press..who are on an Obama love fest.
There will be many a Democrat voting Republican in the the election.
Some time in the near future, Obama may well come out and tell us what changes he plans to make...cause he hasn't said it yet. Sooner or later, the truth will come out..there is very little difference between him and Hillary.
5

right of center,

Chicago 04/06/2008 16:27:34
#3

"Democrat Senator Harkin Suggests a Military Background Makes McCain Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief" And you supported that Loon? I'm not a big McCain fan but what an outrageous anti-American comment from a US Senator, Harkin should be voted out of office for such a stupid comment.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/22/harkin-suggests-military-background-makes-mccain-unfit-to-be-commander-in-chief/
6

b.vivet,

new york 04/06/2008 16:49:55
Dr Arthur Frederick Ide must have been educated at the university of ignorance or your PhD. must be in stupidity. Please use your leg for once when thinking and making comments since your brain works backward.
7

,

04/06/2008 20:19:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

henrymanchester,

UK 04/06/2008 21:54:56
Its amazing how many women are still just spoilt little girls at heart.
9

Sandi,

San Diego 04/06/2008 22:28:09
Hillary Clinton doesn't have to "leave the stage" because Barack Obama has not won yet no matter what he says. The "presumed nominee" has to have 2118 pledged delegates. He doesn't have and cannot have, 2118 pledged delegates. Neither does Clinton. Both need superdelegates to make up the difference and Obama has more of them at this time. But they can change their minds whenever they want right up until they cast their votes at the Convention at the end of August. Clinton might suspend her campaign until the Convention. Why would she concede to someone who hasn't won yet? Now, if nothing changes, Obama may very well win on the first ballot, but you never know. In any case, he's not the nominee until the Convention votes him into that position.

John McCain's position is different as he has won the number of pledged delegates needed to be the "presumed nominee" of the Republican Party.
10

Barbara O'Neill E.,

Las Vegas, NV 05/06/2008 19:52:04
There are many powerful political people and political families (Kennedy) who are bordering on frantic to see Obama as the next president. Why? Given his thin resume, inexperience and his awful circle of "friends and advisors", why are these political powerhouses still so adamant about pushing him into the White House? Could it be that they view him as a puppet for whom they can pull the strings? Ah yes. Someone naive enough that they can control. That must be it. Nothing else makes sense.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.