Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 10th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Watchdog questions Heathrow fingerprint plans



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 March 2008
PLANS to fingerprint passengers at Heathrow's new fifth terminal have been challenged by the UK's data protection watchdog, it emerged yesterday.
The Information Commissioner's Office has warned airport operator BAA that the security measure may breach the Data Protection Act.

BAA last night confirmed that it was in negotiations with the commissioner over fingerprinting, but insisted that
there was no prospect of the row delaying Thursday's opening of the terminal.

The plan will affect all domestic passengers using the £4.3 billion terminal, as well as international passengers transferring to internal flights. Prints will be taken when passengers first go through security, and then checked at the gate.

Deputy Information Commissioner David Smith said: "We want to know why Heathrow needs to fingerprint passengers at all. Taking photographs is less intrusive."

In a statement, BAA said: "Fingerprinting was selected as the most robust method by BAA, the Border and Immigration Agency and other government departments.

"The data is encrypted immediately and is destroyed within 24 hours of use, in accordance with the Data Protection Act."

Separately, the Tories claimed yesterday that queues at Britain's airports have been made longer by the government's failure to recruit enough immigration officers to keep pace with soaring passenger numbers.

Damian Green, the party's immigration spokesman, released figures showing that the number of immigration officers at Heathrow and Gatwick had increased by 5.9 per cent since 2001, while passenger throughput has grown by 12.5 per cent.







The full article contains 248 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 March 2008 10:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

aljok.23,

the world 24/03/2008 09:42:25
NO. Not in my name.
2

yockel,

24/03/2008 11:03:49
"in negotiations" What is there to negotiate? Either it is illegal or it is not.
3

Rabbies Wee Bruthir,

24/03/2008 11:26:48
Whast has a private company got to do with taking 'fingerprints'?
Time to stamp out this intrusion into our freedoms once and for all.
Join No2ID and make your voice heard.

Link here:

http://www.no2id.net/
4

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 24/03/2008 14:52:04
This is pure Orwell.

But hey, look on the bright side, once you have been snapped and finger-printed like some criminal, you can then enjoy BAA's massive shopping mall at Terminal 3.

Stalin would surely be proud of New Labour.

And the most pathetic thing about this is that as an anti-terrorism measure it won't work anyway.

Is any suicide bomber going to worry about being finger-printed?

Nope, buy thanks anyway Gordon.

Why not just tattoo everyone with a number on their wrist like Hitler did?
5

truthsleuth,

24/03/2008 18:19:29
Best idea ever
What have the innocent to be afraid of.

If it stops just one terrorist its been worthwhile.
6

John Blackley,

Florida 24/03/2008 19:55:44
"The data is encrypted immediately and is destroyed within 24 hours of use"

Really? And who's verifying this? Our security and rights conscious government? And is the data never copied? Never supplied to a third-party (such as the police force)? Never analysed for individuals' movement in and out of the country?

Those who fail to defend their individual freedoms (yes, you, truthsleuth) not only lose those freedoms but also jeopardise the liberty of all around them. Fight every single attack on personal freedom - on principle - and claw back some of the power that's been given to those who only abuse it.
7

Eve,

Scotland 24/03/2008 21:12:13
#5 truthsleuth: Haveing the data used unaproperatily!!!
i.e. being sold to other organisations.

May being acused of somthing that some who has similaier prints did!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.