Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Thatcher's 'tears over EU rebate' revealed

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 July 2009
MARGARET Thatcher's famous budget rebate "victory" in Europe 25 years ago was actually a defeat which left her broken and in tears, it was claimed yesterday.
French economist Jacques Attali was a senior adviser to president Francois Mitterrand when prime minister Thatcher demanded "my money back" at an EU summit in Fontainebleau in 1984.

Now 65, he says she lost the rebate battle because she had to acc
ept only half of her "embarrassing" demands.

But Thatcher returned to London triumphant with a long-term deal to cut Britain's EU budget contribution – a deal still operating, and which has saved the Treasury billions of pounds in the last quarter of a century.

Since becoming prime minister five years earlier, Thatcher had stridently complained that the UK's net contributions to the Euro budget were too high – because the money clawed back in grants and subsidies was unfairly small.

The row came to a head at the acrimonious Fontainebleau meeting of Europe's then ten leaders when a deal was done to give the UK an annual rebate on the sums it paid into the Community coffers. Attali, interviewed for the BBC's The Record: Europe, screened this weekend on BBC World and BBC Parliament, says it was a "mistake" to give Thatcher any money back at all.

The programme tells how Thatcher found herself bartering at the Fontainebleau talks to get at least half of the sum she wanted as a rebate. The bidding reached 65 per cent, and she pleaded with President Mitterrand to give her just one more percentage point to take home – and she returned to London with 66 per cent of what she was after.

Mr Attali recalls: "…you will find the minutes of the discussion in one of my books… where you will see that Mrs Thatcher was asking something like 2,000 ecus (a pre-single currency European accounting unit] and she ended up crying, crying in the middle of the meeting, accepting, begging half of it."

He goes on: "It was a defeat. Because she was coming there to get twice as much as she has got.

Actually she cried. Mitterrand told me: 'She has broken like a piece of glass.' I was surprised to see that. She was really broken when she accepted the final deal."





The full article contains 387 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 July 2009 8:26 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Dún Aenghus,

05/07/2009 13:40:57
I wonder did the despot of downing street shed a tear for the hundreds of young boys killed,when she gave the order to sink the General Belgrano,which we now know was sailing AWAY from the "exclusion zone" during the Malvinas war.
2

Alba Abú,

05/07/2009 22:25:07
#2 Your comments are typical of someone suffering from blind loyalty.
Yes! kill them all,except my relations that is. "enemy warship"? The Malvinas islands are 6,000 miles away from England and belong to Argentina.
Therein lies the clue as to who the real enemy was.
3

syntax,

Edinburgh 06/07/2009 01:47:05
Enemy warship sunk - get over it. As for control of the Malvinas - if you want to, try taking them back - you failed once before but I'm sure Gordon Brown will not fight this time. Feel free, you can have them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.