Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£400,000 fine for BBC – and licence-payers pick up tab



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 July 2008
THE BBC was yesterday fined £400,000 by the media regulator Ofcom for faking winners and misleading audiences in viewer and listener competitions.
The penalty, for flagship shows such as Comic Relief, Sport Relief and Children in Need as well as the Jo Whiley and Russell Brand radio shows, is a record for the corporation.

It comes a year after Ofcom fined the BBC £50,000 for faking competiti
on winner on Blue Peter – and will met by TV licence-payers.

The regulator said: "Ofcom considered that these breaches of the (broadcasting] code were very serious. In each of these cases, the BBC deceived its audience by faking winners of competitions and deliberately conducting competitions unfairly."

The watchdog said that in some cases ruled upon yesterday, programme-makers knew in advance that the audience had no chance of winning the competitions that they were going to broadcast but went ahead with them anyway.

It said: "The investigations found that, in some cases, the production team had taken premeditated decisions to broadcast competitions and encourage listeners to enter, in the full knowledge that the audience stood no chance of winning. In other cases, programmes faced with technical problems made up the names of winners."

A member of the production team posed as a winner on a phone-in competition on Comic Relief on BBC1 in March last year, and a similar scenario featured on a Sport Relief phone-in during July in 2006.

On Children in Need, in 2005, the name of a fictitious winner was read out on air.

Earlier this year, ITV was hit with a record £5.67 million fine for the abuse of premium-rate lines on shows that included Ant And Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway. GMTV, which is 75 per cent owned by ITV, had been fined a previous record of £2 million.

In July last year, the BBC was ordered to pay a then unprecedented £50,000 fine over a Blue Peter phone-in scandal in which a young studio guest posed as a competition winner.

In the Russell Brand show on 6 Music, a member of staff posed as a competition winner in an edition of the show that was billed as live but pre-recorded. Jo Whiley's show on Radio 1 faked a competition winner on two occasions.

Other BBC shows involved in yesterday's ruling include The Liz Kershaw Show on 6 Music, The Clare McDonnell Show on the same digital station and TMi on BBC2 and CBBC.

The BBC Trust, which holds the corporation to account, said it regretted the fine would lead to a loss of licence-fee payers' money. It said the BBC made a public apology last summer and "a firm commitment to put its house in order".





The full article contains 469 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 July 2008 1:08 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Jay Kay,

31/07/2008 08:02:20
This is one tax I simply refuse to pay, I do not have a TV and never will have as long as the people of this country are forced to pay for the EBC. Then pay for sky, then pay for the premium movies and sport and every other thing thats worth watching. The EBC provide nothing of any great fibre certainly not worth paying £139.50 of my precious pounds. I would much rather save that thanks, Ill give it to my grannie so she can turn her heating on for a few days in the coldest part of the winter and she wont freeze to death.
2

MacGillicuddy,

31/07/2008 08:38:22
Why should the licence-payer pay this fine? The producers involved should be PERSONALLY liable.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 31/07/2008 08:52:07
Another good reason to scrap the iniquitous television tax, and force the EBC to compete on the open market.
4

Venachar,

31/07/2008 09:14:16
I think Jonathan Ross should pay!
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 10:38:12
Of course the licence payers will pick up the tab. The BBC was fined as a corporate organisation. The BBC is funded by licence fees therefore the licence payer will foot the ball. It's hardly rocket scienc is it?

Tell you what though, I'd happily pay double the licence fee if it meant that adverts were banned from all channels during the course of programs.
6

JT,

31/07/2008 19:55:36
THIS IS WRONG, this is a mess that the executives are responsible for and they are the ones that should be paying this fine, not the license payers.
7

Incandescent with Rage!!!,

03/09/2008 10:10:45
The EBC should be pay per view, if that were the case I'm sure they would economise at the soonest possible time. In the 21st century it is a criminal act to force people to pay for a poor quality out dated service which they may not even intend to watch!

On top of that Joe public does not even have a right to decide the direction this group is taking. Only the elite have that right, the people of ‘Britain’, that area of land in the south east of England.

And Mr. Salmond when do you intend to right this wrong for the people of Scotland?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the BBC devote more resources to covering sport north of the Border?
Yes, we don’t get a fair deal at the moment
Yes, we don’t get a fair deal at the moment
Yes, we don’t get a fair deal at the moment
No, the coverage is perfectly adequate as it is
No, the coverage is perfectly adequate as it is
No, the coverage is perfectly adequate as it is
With limited cash, hard decisions must be made
With limited cash, hard decisions must be made
With limited cash, hard decisions must be made

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.