Scots told: insulate your homes or pay more in tax
Thermal image of a badly insulated home. Picture: PA
SCOTS who do not insulate their homes should be forced to pay higher council tax or face increased stamp duty on their property, according to a leading figure in the sector.
Alex McLeod, chairman of the Association for the Conservation of Energy, told The Scotsman he thinks “sticks” as well as “carrots” are needed to encourage people to conserve energy in their homes.
He blamed “apathy” for low rates of use of insulation in Scotland and said other European countries were far better at conserving energy.
And he suggested penalising people for not insulating their walls and lofts by putting up their council tax or increasing stamp duty linked to the property would force homeowners to take action.
However, his views were met with a furious response from groups, who argued that at a time of austerity it would be wrong to penalise already struggling householders.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance branded the ideas “outrageous”, and even Friends of the Earth Scotland disagreed, saying the Scottish Government should instead pay for everyone to have free insulation.
Mr McLeod said: “We have the worst housing stock in northern Europe. I think it’s down to apathy. People are walking past £50 notes every day.”
Installing loft insulation saves an average household about £175 a year and cavity wall insulation about £135 a year.
Mr McLeod said he thought there were a variety of solutions available to encourage people to act.
“Should it be carrot or stick? I think a combination of both,” he said. “You could use council tax, or you could use stamp duty to force improvement in energy efficiency.”
He said people without insulation could either be given penalties, or those who had fitted it could be given discounts on council tax or stamp duty.
“A discount to council tax is not going to help councils when they are struggling and a penalty might have legal implications, but that’s not to say it shouldn’t be looked at,” he said.
“And I definitely think stamp duty is one to look at.”
Under the scheme, levels of stamp duty and council tax paid by households would be linked to their home energy ratings on their Energy Performance Certificate, which gives a rating from A to G. Mr McLeod acknowledged that “in these times of austerity this could be quite difficult to implement”.
He also supports an idea currently under consultation by the UK government of “consequential improvements”, whereby if improvements or changes are carried out to a property, energy- efficiency measures must be put in place at the same time.
Robert Oxley, campaign manager for the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “It’s outrageous for Alex McLeod to suggest hard-pressed households should pay any more in council tax.
“Insulation makes sense because in the long run it cuts energy bills, it doesn’t need any financial incentive beyond that.
“A council tax discount to those who’ve insulated their homes could be a good idea, but no-one should be penalised for not lagging their loft.”
In Scotland, almost nine out of ten solid walls are not insulated and four out of ten cavity walls. Although just 3 per cent of lofts have no insulation at all, 48 per cent are below the building regulation standard of 270mm.
In an uninsulated dwelling, a third of all heat lost is through the walls and a quarter through the roof.
However, Stan Blackley, chief executive of Friends of the Earth Scotland, disagreed that council tax or stamp duty penalties were the best approach to take.
“We need to make it easy for everyone to live in a warm, healthy and environmentally-friendly home, not penalise people for not being able to afford insulation, or for not meeting the overly-restrictive requirements of the large number of confusing schemes and suppliers currently out there,” he said.
“I don’t think people are apathetic, they’re probably more likely to be cold and skint and confused instead.”
Instead, he said the Scottish Government should roll out a scheme of free insulation for everyone, regardless of their personal circumstances.
“For a fraction of the cost of, for example, the Scottish Government’s roads programme, we could insulate every home in Scotland for free,” he said.
“Not only would this significantly cut carbon emissions, but it would bring people out of fuel poverty, improve public health, enhance housing stock, create thousands of jobs and boost the Scottish economy. It’s a no-brainer.”
The Scottish Government has legally binding targets of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 42 per cent by 2020 and 80 per cent by 2050. Home energy use accounts for over a third of greenhouse gas emissions.
Greg McCracken, policy officer for Age Scotland, does not think homeowners can be expected to meet the cost of insulating their homes.
“Bringing our existing housing stock up to the appropriate standard by maximising energy efficiency is vital. However, the cost of this for individual households can be prohibitive.”
In March last year, the Scottish Government published a report considering four options, which could be introduced from 2015 onwards. They included requiring properties to have cavity wall and loft insulation and requiring properties to meet an Energy Performance Certificate rating of C or D.
Dr Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, thinks setting minimum standards of energy efficiency for homes is “vital”.
“With homes accounting for a quarter of Scotland’s climate emissions, a step change in improving the energy efficiency of Scotland’s housing stock is critical,” he said.
Mr McLeod also warned that the UK government was going in the wrong direction in setting new policies for insulation through its flagship Green Deal, and he feared it would lead to lower levels of take-up.
The Green Deal will include an Energy Company Obligation that will set targets of insulating 380,000 homes with solid wall insulation and will have a very minor focus on cavity walls.
But even though most of Scotland’s older housing stock has solid walls, Mr McLeod thinks this is the wrong approach because it costs up to £13,000 for an average home to have solid wall insulation, compared with only £350 for cavity wall insulation.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said the Green Deal would generate demand for “all types of insulation”.
A spokesman for the Scottish Government pointed out that an independent review was being carried out into its strategy to address fuel poverty.
- Scottish independence: I don’t want ‘separatism’ says Sir Tom Farmer
- Rangers administration: End game nears for fallen icon
- USA 5 - 1 Scotland: Donovan grabs hattrick as Scots routed in Florida
- Vatican poised to make more arrests in papal leaks scandal
- Rangers administration: Duff & Phelps ‘hopeful’ that Taxman will agree to CVA
- Scottish independence: I don’t want ‘separatism’ says Sir Tom Farmer
- Scottish independence: Labour voters ‘will deliver independence’
- Rangers administration: End game nears for fallen icon
- Leaders: Blurred vision on independence
- Rangers administration: Duff & Phelps ‘hopeful’ that Taxman will agree to CVA
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Edinburgh
Monday 28 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 15 mph
Wind direction: North east
Tomorrow
Cloudy
Temperature: 10 C to 16 C
Wind Speed: 12 mph
Wind direction: North east


Comments
There are 86 comments to this article
Page 1 of 6
Richard Lionheart
Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 04:30 PMGreen Anarchists at it again. End GreenAnarchist Policies NOW = Save the Human Race and the Planet
Ron Greer
Monday, February 6, 2012 at 01:42 PM82 increased risk of a miserable cold life and early death from hypothermia, mainly in older poorer people and proletarian infants--a Grand Plan perhaps?
Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head
Monday, February 6, 2012 at 01:21 PMEncourage people to save money by insulating their homes by all means. It makes sense. However, let's drop all this cr@p about saving the planet eh?
duelaynomore
Monday, February 6, 2012 at 10:00 AMPREPARING US FOR THE WINMILL BASED POWER COSTS ?
jerrymanders
Sunday, February 5, 2012 at 10:34 PMWhat if one lives without heating?
Irrlichter
Sunday, February 5, 2012 at 11:52 AMOne definition of fascism (attributed to Benito Mussollini, who knew a thing or two about it) is that it is the merging of the government,with big business, to fleece the mugs who were stupid enough to vote the politicians into power. This is an example of naked fascism in action, an unelected lobbyist, determining Scottish government policy, so that he and his buddies can fleece the Scottish population. No, the fact that this Mcleodollini has gotten the WWF involved, is indicative that he is some sort of owl worshipping bampot and if we are silly enough to follow his agenda, we'll be up to our necks in owls and not have sufficient energy flux density to expand the Scottish economy to the detriment of the Scottish people....
Faceless_bureaucrat
Sunday, February 5, 2012 at 04:00 AMGreen NAZI's - why do they give them the publicity they seek ? Agenda here ?
Mark Bishop
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 10:50 PMComment removed by moderator
Ron Greer
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 10:40 PMLook guys, there's no insulation material left as it's all been stuffed between the ears of politicians and they're claiming it on expenses.
waspy100
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 10:06 PMIt has been said that a full and happy house is always warm. could be they contribute to the heating .Seriously though our house has family in and out all the time and the only time it seems to get cold is when they have not visited for a few days??
Not Available
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 09:50 PMHow come this idiot gets column inches? I live in a top flat in a stone built tnement. There is no attic space to insulate and the walls are that thick that they are as warm as if the were insultaed. Would cost a fortune in this large property to get internal insulation.
Pilgrim
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 09:14 PMI must confess my house is fully insulated in the roof and in the wall cavities. It really does same me a lot of money. What McLeod says about extra taxation is rubbish.
waspy100
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 09:02 PMThe whole article is rubbish and Mr McLeod comes across as a numpty and a complete idiot. Then again going by his photo that comment is under exaggerated. I bet his house is nice and warm with all his hot air spouting out.
Rob Royston
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 08:20 PMWhy is everyone getting carried away with this idiots ranting. One of them came round the back of my house, uninvited, when he spotted me working in my garage and proceded to tell me that I would not be able to sell my house unless I installed cavity wall insulation. I told him he was tresspassing and that I had no intention of ever leaving my home in any case, so could he kindly return to the street. These sharks make a fortune encouraging people to do unwanted work so that they can cash in on any grants. They are nothing but parasites.
Tartancult
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 05:56 PMI'm a little peeved that no one has taken my 'windmills on the roofs' approach seriously. An added benefit to this is tthat when you want to move house, you add a motor to the windmill and literally, move house. With proper instrumentation, you could take the house to Spain for your holidays....
Page 1 of 6
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.