Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Councils turn up the heat on giant new incinerator plans

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 May 2009
A GIANT incinerator providing energy for thousands of homes is being lined up to deal with Edinburgh's household waste, it was revealed today.
The "energy from waste" plant, which burns rubbish to produce electricity, would be big enough to handle around 200,000 tonnes of waste a year – around the same amount currently produced by the Capital.

A site at Millerhill in Midlothian has be
en chosen for the new waste management facility, where it is hoped that much of the waste can be transferred using rail links.

The joint initiative by Midlothian and Edinburgh councils has seen private companies invited to come up with ideas on how to deal with household waste from both local authorities and avoid tough new EU landfill fines.

But the Evening News understands that incineration – which is sure to prove highly controversial – is the front-runner.

The development is likely to cost up to £100 million, with city leaders indicating they would consider using the controversial private finance initiative to fund it.

The Scottish Government has ruled that no more than 25 per cent of municipal waste is to be used to generate energy by 2025, but it is understood the plan for Millerhill is to open it up to commercial and business waste also.

Once a waste processing option is chosen later this year, it is hoped an outline planning application can be submitted by early 2010, with the plant running by 2014.

Green groups today warned city leaders against going down the incineration route, describing it as a "a cheap and nasty solution".

But Russell Imrie, Midlothian Council cabinet member for strategic services, said energy from waste was worth considering. He said: "We are getting people to come in and give us an idea of the options open to us.

"The energy from waste idea is interesting because it does give you the possibility of heating or supplying electricity to huge developments like the ERI or the bio-quarter. But we will need to consider all of the factors, including traffic into the site and other environmental considerations.

"Whatever happens, we should not underestimate the size of the challenge facing us in terms of these major financial penalties." City officials have long favoured the "energy from waste" approach but a series of wrangles over locations for plants and shifting Government recycling targets in recent years has delayed any concrete plans coming to fruition.

A spokesman for Friends of the Earth Scotland said: "The solution to Edinburgh's rubbish mountain lies in reducing the waste we produce in the first place, and recycling what we can't reduce.

"Simply burning this waste is a cheap and nasty solution, and leaves a residue of toxic ash which still needs to be disposed of."

Councillor Robert Aldridge, the city's environment leader, said the council remained "open-minded". He added: "We will be looking for bidders to submit proposals about what technology would best meet the needs.

"We have started the process of seeking expert advice to help us take this project forward.

"The next stage will see contractors coming forward with proposals, we will ask these are in line with the Scottish Governments zero waste policy, which both councils have signed up to."

DISPOSAL OF RUBBISH HAS LONG BEEN A BURNING ISSUE
THE prospect of building incinerators to handle Lothian's waste has long been a controversial subject.

Where projects have been proposed, they have been met with objections ranging from health fears about the particulates produced during incineration to the number of lorry journeys needed to service the plants. Plans by private firm Viridor for an incinerator near Dunbar, which would have dealt with 450,000 tonnes of waste a year, were put on hold last year after the Scottish Government set tough new recycling targets which ruled that no more than 25 per cent of municipal waste can be sent to incinerators which burn rubbish to produce electricity.

This left the five Lothian and Borders councils in difficulty because they had spent five years – and £2 million – producing a Lothian-wide waste strategy that would involve 50 per cent of their residual waste going to an energy from waste plant.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 May 2009 10:34 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Environment
 
1

Amenemhat,

04/05/2009 12:04:50
It's ok, it is far enough away from Portobello so it should get passed
2

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 04/05/2009 12:06:42
Midlothian and Edinburgh Councils,using their initiative now there is a giggle,good idea though.
3

Fifi la Bonbon,

04/05/2009 12:26:31
A queasy looking specimen with a wispy beard and bags under his eyes said from his sick bed that the solution to Edinburgh's rubbish mountain lies in reducing the waste we produce in the first place, and recycling what we can't reduce.


Why can't normal politicians show some leadership and tell the green freaks to just f*** off?
4

I love to eat Sellotape,

04/05/2009 12:29:51
The heat generated from Evening News comments about the trams is surely a great untapped source of energy.

If only we could find some way of harnessing it.
5

Douglas,

Bathgate 04/05/2009 15:46:54
#3 Fifi la Bonbon: Thanks for making me laugh.
6

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 04/05/2009 17:24:14
So using PFI to fund this, how much more than £100m will it cost, and how many generation after us will have to continue paying for it.

Here's an ideal. Scrap the Trams, save about £300m and put the case to the Scottish Government that this development will meet their targets. Win-Win-Win situation. Edinburgh stops getting taken for a ride with the Trams; Edinburgh get the Incinerator burning waste and generating electricity; Scottish Government saves up to £200m from the £500m it reluctantly gave to the Trams - forced to by Labour, Tory, LibDem, Greens and Independent MSP's
7

Pat Sharpe,

04/05/2009 19:09:29
Some people dont have a clue!

There are strict guidlines about what emmsions can be let loose from a power plant - this is no exception. There are many methods that the industry use to remove harmful toxins from smoke and the discharge is actually very clean.

Yes it would slightly increase emissions, but FotE and co are too quick to put 1 + 1 and get 3.

Do some research before critisising a great idea!
8

El Franko,

Dagenham 05/05/2009 12:20:13
In general, I would prefer more landfill to more air pollution. But a discussion of their relative merits, and what would be a sensible mix of them, will have to be deferred until we have left the lunatic asylum of the EU. What a tonic it would be if the June elections see a massive boost to the anti-EU vote!
9

Pat Sharpe,

05/05/2009 13:53:36
8: Learn the facts!!

Landfill = air pollution!! (mostly CO2)
Probably a lot more than an incerator!
10

El Franko,

05/05/2009 14:38:20
#9, I don't regard CO2 as a pollutant. It is very beneficial, indeed essential, for plant life and hence in due course our own lives. We have relatively low levels of CO2 in the atmosphere at present, and we'd benefit from a lot more to increase crop yields.
11

New Town Resident,

05/05/2009 15:34:29
8&10. Spot on El Franko.

Edinburgh is surrounded by underused landfill sites - formerely open cast coal mines and quarries.

It's absurb that we should be didctated to by an EU directive that was instigated by the Dutch Greens. They may very well have a landfill problem in Holland, but we do not.

Rubbish disposal should be a matter for local councils, never mind Holyrood or Westminster, let alone Brussels, where the gravy trainers have foolishly transfereed it in order to justify their self serving existence.

There is finally recognition that the CFP has failed and it should be returned to member states - rubbish disposal policy is clearly another one.

Edinburgh should simply refuse to pay the fines and carry on using landfill rather than waste money on highly polluting incinerators.




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.