Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SNP gives more funding to ally's Islamic group



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 August 2008
THE SNP Government is facing more criticism from Muslim groups after ploughing a further £190,000 into an Islamic group led by one of Alex Salmond's closest allies.
The Scottish Islamic Foundation, headed by SNP parliamentary candidate Osama Saeed, received the cash last week, on top of a £210,000 sum given to the group in March.

The fresh money came from a £5m pot of funding known as the Race, Religion and
Refugee Integration (RRRI) fund, which is used to support minority ethnic and faith communities in Scotland.

Scotland on Sunday revealed last month that leading Muslim figures were furious over the first cash award, claiming the SNP had given preferential treatment to the group. It then emerged that documents establishing the SIF as a company had been signed in the party's Glasgow headquarters.

Many other organisations, including at least one other Muslim group, were unsuccessful in their applications.

One senior Muslim figure who supported the SNP at the last election said last night: "The Government should be supporting many other organisations who are also vying for the Government's attention. We don't have anything against the SIF, but it isn't wise to throw so much money at this organisation. People are very upset about it."

The SIF was set up in January and was established as a company in May. Saeed is the SNP's Westminster candidate for the Glasgow Central constituency and is a former researcher for Salmond.

The decision to award the RRRI funding was made by SNP Communities Minister Stewart Maxwell. But a spokeswoman for the Scottish Government said last night that the initial assessment for the funding was made by an independent trust.

The SIF was not able to supply all the documentation which applicants for RRRI cash are asked to provide, including their most recent audited accounts and the most recent annual report.

But the Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Providing every document detailed on the RRRI application form is not a mandatory requirement of securing grant funding. Like every other one of the 33 organisations (that won funding], they provided sufficient information for the process of independent evaluation, led by officials, to take place."

Along with Saeed, the SIF is being run by several other SNP figures, including SNP researcher Humza Yousaf, MSP Bashir Ahmed and former SNP researcher Noman Tahir. The board also contains members of Saeed's family.

Following a letter from Labour MSP George Foulkes, the Auditor General is currently considering whether to investigate the funding deal.

The funding deal was also the subject of a complaint to the police from a member of the public. However, the complaint has been dismissed by Edinburgh's Procurator Fiscal.



The full article contains 451 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 August 2008 11:55 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

,

10/08/2008 00:05:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Soup kitchen,

10/08/2008 00:06:35
By the way, why are we paying £400,000 to Islamics when we haven't got the money to hire 1,000 extra police?

I thought that was our top priority? What changed? Has Salmond and MacAskill clarified why this is an even more important priority?
3

,

10/08/2008 00:15:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

10/08/2008 00:15:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

mac1888,

10/08/2008 00:21:01
#2 The SNP are on course to deliver more than an extra 1000 Plods!
6

truthsleuth,

10/08/2008 00:23:14
The Easy way to get a state grant.

Arrive in the UK from an Asian or African country preferably a Moslem one

Complain a few times about discrimination

Get the support of politicians trying to get the support of 'devoted followers' in marginal seats and completely ignoring their indigenous electorate.
7

Soup kitchen,

10/08/2008 00:24:02
5 Mac1888

No there not. Police levels have fallen this year.

Can you clarify why this £400,000 wasn't given to the police to achieve that top priority sooner rather than later?
8

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 10/08/2008 00:27:18
The government funding of any religious group is a nonsense. We have too many problems and priorities funding other activities, such as winter fuel allowances for pensioners, or some assistance to reduce fuel tax to help the whole country. If this was intended to pour oil on troubled waters with the favoured Islamic group it seems to have had the opposite effect by upsetting another Islamic group who were not in receipt of taxpayer largesse.

It also seems to be crass stupidity to have the papers signed by the SIF group in the SNP part HQ and leave the SNP open to charges of "purchasing" influence with this group and vice versa since some of its members are also SNP office-bearers. Furthermore, like most handouts the likelihood of anyone actually accounting for its expenditure is likely to be vanishingly small - so what is the extra £190K for? Who will provide evidence of its disbursement and reasons for doing so?

It's not clear at all from this article where the £5M "pot" is sourced from - is this from Scottish Parliament resources or from the UK Government?

Too many unanswered questions and with one party already smarting from its leader taking an early bath it's not a great idea to even go near that.
9

subrosa,

10/08/2008 00:28:20
I'm not too comfortable with the link between Saeed and the Scottish government. As #3 says it is moving in the wrong direction and will alienate voters such as myself. Enough's enough now.
10

subrosa,

10/08/2008 00:29:07
#7

I explained the new police recruitment to you on another thread.
11

Soup kitchen,

10/08/2008 00:30:15
10 Subroasa

No you didn't.
12

walter,

10/08/2008 00:33:19
#4
Nice try and typical to spin it into an attack on someone else.
Foulkes would have had no reason to send a letter to the auditor general had not the SNP Scottish government given so much money from this fund to an SNP led Islamic group to the detriment of other ethnic and religious groups.
I agree with #3 why does this RRRI fund exist in the first place.
13

Fanling,

Switzerland 10/08/2008 00:36:16
#4 ay!'em two
You're absolutely right about Foulkes. The man is a headless chicken and should be led away to a dark room to fester and splutter his nonsensical outpourings to himself.

The topic of the article is worrying enough though if it carries credence.

#9 subrosa
Look what became of Labour in the 1970s onwards because of its loonie left funding of daftie movements. SNP take note. Marginalising your core vote is not too clever.

#11 Soup kitchen
Yes she did. I read it.

14

Soup kitchen,

10/08/2008 00:39:52
13 Fanling

Firstly, do you remember the fuss the SNP made over £950. The SNP set the bar really low...

... so anything Foulkes does over £400,000 will appear totally propper.

Secondly, no subrosa didn't explain the police to me. He/she wrote some unsubstatianted rubbish along the lines of the "world is flat because it is."

Subroas has no idea about police numbers in Scotland, because if he/she did they would acknowledge police have been falling under the SNP.
15

Fanling,

Switzerland 10/08/2008 00:47:22
#14 Soup kitchen

Yes, the subject of your first para I do vaguely remember. Your beef with subrosa is however between the two of you. Hope you can both reach an agreement.
16

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 00:48:02
This is just taking the proverbial now.

I think that the MSP has done the right thing in referring the matter to the Audit Commission, and they will check in an impartial and non-political way whether the rules have been followed.

But it doesn't matter whether the rules have been followed properly. If the rules allow this sort of thing to happen then maybe we need new rules. And let's forget for a minute whether someone with Mr Saeed's history of association with Islamist extremists is an issue.

Mr Saeed is a long term political ally of Mr Salmond, and the staff of the organisation Mr Saeed has established with public money seem to be overwhelmingly SNP figures. It is widely known that the SNP has engaged on a political strategy of trying to gain favour with Muslim communities in Scotland. As it is, this funding exercise has served to sow discord among Scotland's Muslim organisations, and has effectively disempowered many other worthy organisations which had made application for funding all over Scotland. This is not just an administrative issue, it is a huge political issue and calls into question the judgement, if not the integrity, of Scottish ministers.

The Scottish Parliament needs to call in this action of piling £400,000 into one organisation with such close SNP links, and to look at which organisations which also applied for funding from this budget were excluded, and to consider whether a different and more even handed approach might be in the best interests of Scotland's need to build community cohesion.
17

Fanling,

10/08/2008 00:52:18
#6 truthsleuth
Sorry, missed you out from my post #13. You got it in one.
18

,

10/08/2008 01:05:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Fanling,

Switzerland 10/08/2008 01:23:08
#18
In total agreement about funding alien organisations to the detriment of deserving and infinitely more important indigenous community priorities.

No religious group should receive government funding to promote its own selfish interests. Absolutely none. Let them raise their own cash. Most other groups have to do just that. This is an insult to the community at large. I despair at this creepy kowtowing to muslims. Nod in their direction and they will demand - not merely ask - more. This is not the Scotland I once knew and revered.
20

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 01:28:48
Well that's one way to try to hide an embarassing story! Hard on your fingers, though.
21

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 01:34:55
Students and their wacky antics, eh?
22

walter,

10/08/2008 01:42:50
Isn't this just typical, the SNP has formed an islamic wing from tax payers money and is being criticized for doing so.
Articles lately have shown the SNP are just as corrupt as their followers on here have accused the other parties of being.
To prevent people commenting on this the same derogatory comment is posted a thousand times to get the tread closed.
23

indune1,

Canada 10/08/2008 03:44:57
If the Scotsman had any b*llocks it would have a means to deal with eejits like David Banks. Or is he one of their agents?
24

Longdirk Maceth,

NZ 10/08/2008 05:36:47
Can anyone get this f 2 c k ing retard Banks banned off this newspaper web site?
For Chirst sakes man eff off!
25

I chose a name...,

10/08/2008 05:46:12
maybe, just maybe, its because the brightest and most talented young Muslims are attracted to the SNP because of their record for standing up to Westminster over terror laws and in cases of civil liberties, ID cards, etc. Maybe, just maybe, they are also the right ones to lead a successful lobbying organisation because never before have young Muslims felt empowered enough to do this. What exists at the moment are a bunch of old timers, corrupt as anything, who have no idea how to deal with todays problems. So long as they know how to wear their separate hats I dont see a problem in this at all. The independent and unbiased criteria the applications were judged on were met, so where is the story?
26

Ray Merrall,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 08:07:12
After so many comments, I was beginning to wonder what David's surname rhymed with?

If David can manage to stroke the keyboard as many times as he obviously does, may I suggest that he gets a life and finds some to share it with, he will find that his popularity will increase as much as his talent for playing with the extension on his forehead.

As if David was trying to block any dissent from being spoken about the glorious leader......
27

SouthernSkye,

10/08/2008 08:55:40
Too Many raseholes on here these days. It was once a place of useful debate and arguement. Now it is a place of fools.
28

Chaplin,

10/08/2008 08:56:26
David Banks,

No matter how vicious the arguements on both sides of the independance debate get. Both sides are united in the fact that your a complete plonker with your constant spamming. Get help before its too late !!!
29

Ken_Fitlike,

10/08/2008 09:39:45


Why oh why

30

donald,

glasgow 10/08/2008 10:52:13
Never heard Barnes comment on the Galloway's Labour liars in the Urdu times that printed so much rubbish about the SNP going to deport all Asians, etc.

Galloway became rich on such lies.
31

donald,

glasgow 10/08/2008 10:59:39
When will Barnes report on how Asians were used by his Labour Party?

Galloway made himself rich by lying in the Asian Times. by his cronies claiming that the SNP were going to deport Scottish Asians. He is still paid for his sectarian games by the Daily Reptile, which printed his article on the Eastern Front by election, praising "Catholic" Maggie Curran. Who cares, other than Labour and their LOL stooges.


32

donald,

glasgow 10/08/2008 11:00:55
Galloway made himself rich by lying in the Asian Times. by his cronies claiming that the SNP were going to deport Scottish Asians. He is still paid for his sectarian games by the Daily Reptile, which printed his article on the Eastern Front by election, praising "Catholic" Maggie Curran. Who cares, other than Labour and their LOL stooges.
33

ochone,

Sauchie, clack's 10/08/2008 11:20:28
It's such a shame that sucha thing as proof seems to be no longer required in the quaint little world that some unionists live in.

If there is any, where is it?

What is it?
34

ochone,

Sauchie, Clack's 10/08/2008 11:25:56
Such a pity that proof of any wrong doing is no longer a requirement in the strange little world that these unionists exsist in, nope innuendo, especially when racially tinted is sufficent for them
35

ochone,

Sauchie, Clack's 10/08/2008 11:35:59
It's interesting that in the rapidly diminishing world that some unionists exist in, that such a thing as proof is not required, in this case it would seem that racially tinted allegations are enough!
36

Miss H,

10/08/2008 11:39:40
8 That is one of several inaccuracies in the story. The SNP does not have a headquarters in Glasgow. Party HQ is at 107 McDonald Road Edinburgh. The initial story also said that the papers were signed by the SNP's solicitor. No they weren't. They were drawn up by a solicitor who may (or may not) be a member of the SNP. How the SoS thinks they know his party affiliation is interesting. The real SNP HQ would not pass on that information because of data protection and I doubt that the guy's branch would either, for the same reason.

Somebody has obviously fed this story to the press but only the Scotland on Sunday has picked it up.
37

Budgie,

INCHINNAN 10/08/2008 13:43:36
Wow! There are so many comments removed. Ah! well!!
I agree wholeheartedly with posting No6 (Truthsleuth). It's a wonder that this posting has not been deleted for it's honesty.
38

Gere,

Scotland 10/08/2008 14:27:31
How much of this money is going to be surreptitiously diverted to the purchase of explosive substances????
39

Gere,

Scotland 10/08/2008 14:28:57
How much of this money is going to be surreptitiously diverted to the purchase of explosive substances????
40

Gere,

10/08/2008 14:29:49
How much of this money is going to be surreptitiously diverted to the purchase of explosive substances????
41

Gere,

Scotland 10/08/2008 14:30:39
How much of this money is going to be surreptitiously diverted to the purchase of explosive substances????
42

Gere,

Scotland 10/08/2008 14:38:51
How much of this money is going to be surreptitiously diverted to the purchase of explosive substances????
43

GONNYNODEATHAT,

Glasgow 10/08/2008 15:26:23
The The Scottish Islamic Foundation, headed by SNP parliamentary candidate Osama Saeed and the SNP are ANTI TRADE UNION PARTIES. If you feed one then you will need to feed the other. From one Greedy Minority group to another. What is the SNP doing to help the POOREST Members of our society. (Working Class People)I did vote for your Party recently but I now know I made a mistake and wont be voting SNP again.
44

,

10/08/2008 16:14:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

10/08/2008 16:14:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

we the people,

10/08/2008 17:46:34
why all thecomments blocked what's the beef?
47

Allan(handofgod137),

10/08/2008 18:46:47
What a waste of public money.
48

Fanling,

Switzerland 11/08/2008 10:12:10
#22, 23, 24

You may well ask. I've reported the scumbag Banks a couple of times, but this newspaper allows his/its spamming to continue. As I opened ... you may well ask.
49

Fanling,

Switzerland 11/08/2008 12:21:15
Whatever self-righteous censor had my straight and honest post #3 pulled needs to ask a few questions of himself/herself. My concern on this subject is what I wrote about. If that doesn't accord with your view of our world, then tough.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.