Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Scottish football must search for the lost arts of attack-minded players

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 May 2009
SCOTSMAN sportswriter Stuart Bathgate's use of "mediocrity" in his analysis of a recent Scottish Premier League match could have been used on a much wider scale over many Saturday afternoons.
In the steady deterioration of quality, excitement and skill among many within the professional game in Scotland, it has become all too apparent that a harvest is being reaped from the seeds of either negative or inadequate coaching of our youngsters
which may have been sown as far back as the 1970s.

It is, of course, the older enthusiasts of the game who see it most obviously and who thus suffer greater loss at the passing from the Scottish scene of the sumptuous skills of the likes of Johnstone, Henderson, Baxter, Murdoch, Cooper, Stanton, Edwards, Buchan, Jardine, O'Rourke, Harper, Gordon, Hunter, Wallace, Hood ... the names trip off the tongue. The young supporters who turn up faithfully nowadays to watch the best of the SPL in action cannot appreciate what they are missing and, for many, it is likely that the media hype and glorification of the modern game gives them an experience of excitement as satisfying as the aforementioned names gave us "older" enthusiasts 30 or 40 years ago. They do not know what they are missing.

The serious decline of player skill within the Scottish game, however, has surely never been more obvious. Granted, passing and ball control is infinitely better. Dead ball conversion around the opposing box is, generally, excellent. There, however, the credits stop. Generally, no chances must be taken by a player that possession might be lost; if that is a possibility, don't take the risk. Individually, the ability to feint, dribble, run off the ball, pass the ball into space, lose an opponent or turn up where and when opposition defences least expect it are, almost without exception, lost arts.

It is possible of course that, as in many walks of life, we will never see them restored to the football field; coaching of such may now be well beyond the pale of our managers, trainers and coaches as they themselves will be too old to possess these talents, carry them on to the training field and physically display them to the youngsters in the hope they might grasp them and put them into practice.

That assumes, of course, that we still have coaches who practiced such skills themselves in their day and are not restricted from passing them on by a potentially more serious aspect of the "developing" game. I refer to the quite appalling – and distressing – disappearance of both forwards and attack-minded members, first, from team selections and, second, from other areas of the field once a game is live. There is a possibility they do not exist in sufficient numbers now for that even to be an option for many of our managers.

When Hearts played Aberdeen at Tynecastle earlier this season, there were only two recognised forwards on the field – Christian Nade and Lee Miller – from the 22 who started the match. Fifty years ago there would have been ten; forty years ago there were, in most instances, a minimum of six and, in all probability, eight.

What on earth has been going on since these days – when we all loved scoring or creating goals – that has persuaded managers to transfer a desire to win matches to the almost perpetual desire to ensure they do not lose them? The answers, of course, would have to come from the men themselves, but it seems pretty clear that there has been little or no persuasion to develop attacking skills in young players but, instead, instil a mindset in the ten outfield players that they get defensive duties foremost in their minds – and think about offensive duties only if and when the opportunity might arise. The result of this catastrophic switch of emphasis has undoubtedly led to the presence of fewer personalities with ball skills and a willingness to take risks, huge decreases in attack-minded players and, most obviously to the Scottish public, a dearth of goalscorers at every level of the sport.

I heard a story a couple of months ago about a manager of a Scottish football club who hosted an open day on his club's training ground. He had contacted local schools and asked the staff to send along the best 10, 11 and 12-year-olds to the training ground for a day with the club, manager, coaches and some players. Seventy boys appeared. After a few words of welcome from the manager, the boys were split into four groups. There were four goalkeepers, 28 defenders, 32 midfield players and six forwards. He could not believe his eyes – but would the Scottish football public be surprised? I suspect not. We have to arrest this decline.

• Donald Ford played for Hearts and Falkirk from 1964 to 1976 and made three appearances for Scotland





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 20/05/2009 00:31:50
A wee bit nostalgia never hurt anyone. But is it true?

Let's look at average goals per home game for Hearts:

This year 2.42
10 years ago 2.94
20 years ago 2.17
30 years ago 2.44
40 years ago 2.71

So does this mean that we're about as attacking as we were 30 years ago, more attacking than 20 years ago but less attacking than 10 years ago?
2

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 20/05/2009 00:34:45
And what about Hibs?

This year 2.42 (interesting - same as Hearts!)
10 years ago (weren't in the SPL)
20 years ago 2.00
30 years ago 2.17
40 years ago 3.65

So this year has had more goals than 20 or 30 years ago. Must have been brilliant to go to easter road in 68-69 season though!
3

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 20/05/2009 00:41:22
Finally, the divers fae Govan:

This year 3.11
10 years ago 2.39
20 years ago 2.78
30 years ago 2.33
40 years ago 3.47

Similar pattern. So are we really less attacking than in the 70's and 80's? Or does this show that even though we had loads of strikers about, they didnae score that mnay goals?
4

Jon Bon Jovi,

Dublin 20/05/2009 03:14:54

jimmy calderdud is the epitomy of the defensive manager these days. Completely void of any idea how to play attractive football, sticks 10 men behind the ball when playing away.... and then has the audacity to moan at other managers when they do it back to him!!!

JMG!!!!!
5

Media at One,

20/05/2009 06:26:46
I think the above statistics, if they are true, are a great example of what we think is not always what we know.
Neverthless, I do understand why people look on at the game these days and long for the days when football was played by men who wanted to win and didnt need to cheat to do it. And if you think I only mean Lafferty I dont, he is one of thousands of cheats.
I remember when Barcalona went to Ibrox and Messi described it as anti-football. He was probably right, but in Rangers defence it was more than Messi had described it - in essence it was anti-football forced upon Rangers by UEFA's ridiculous rules in which poorer teams just cannot compete with richer clubs because the system is designed to benefit the wealthy clubs. A rich club finishing 3rd in Italy get preference over a poorer team who wins the Danish league because the Danish champions will need to qualify - NO CHAMPIONS should need to qualify! The problem is that Walter Smith then played all his games like that, the cautious approach! I cannot see Rangers winning on Sunday because WS will not allow the players to express themselves, he will be cautious, tentative, careful, unwilling to go for the jugular. He does this for two reasons, one he doesnt have the balls to go for it, and two he doesnt have faith in the players under his command.
6

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 20/05/2009 07:51:42
The stats are true (but a bit misleading) - there were more goals scored per game in the league than there are now.

But the trend is exactly the same in England. In fact, the SPL has had more goals per game in 9 out of the last 10 seasons.

Does this mean that Ronaldo, Rooney, Torres, Kuyt, Tevez, Drogba, Robinho, etc have all been affected by the Scottish coaching inadequacies of the 1970's and 80's?

No of course not.

Donald Ford - a great player - but a slaverer in this article.
7

Aitchie,

Craig Gordon Stand 20/05/2009 07:52:33
(then being the 1960's)
8

Anglo Jambo,

Chorley 20/05/2009 08:15:13
I stil believe that there is some truth in what Donald Ford says, despite not much difference in goals scored, football was more attacked minded. There were a lot of great defenders then too. I do think it is now about not losing, so to acheive that have a 5 man mid field. It is more important to draw in a poor game than lose in a great game.
9

Cafu,

20/05/2009 09:33:02
Interesting stats from Aitchie, but it is misleading to compare average goals before and after the introduction of a 10 or 12 team Premier Division, as the opponents on average will be more difficult in a smaller league.

Tynecastle last Saturday was a good example of an attack minded 4-4-2 going badly wrong against a 4-5-1 set-up, largely due to the midfield suiting the 5.
10

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 20/05/2009 17:16:30
Combined results for the east coast teams.

Dodgy decisions per game favouring the Old Firm and penalising east coast teams.

This year 7.22
10 years ago 9.49
20 years ago 9.10
30 years ago 8.74
40 years ago 7.61

So this year, we're at a 40-year low for dodgy decisions favouring the Old Firm, bucking a clear trend over the past 40 years towards this situation becoming increasingly worse. I'd say Craig Levein effectively forcing McCurry into early retirement will have had a lot to do with this, and with Stuart Dougal doing us all a favour this week, I look forward to even fewer brutal decisions hurting us all next season. At this rate, it will be a level playing field by the year 2174.
11

Bemused and above it all,

20/05/2009 17:32:54
A lot of rubbish, before we were slagged off for being 'naive' or 'cavalier', remember the days of the scottish calvary charge with a stramash in the box? Midfielders with repetitive strain injuries from watching the ball get hoofed from area to area? Might seem more attacking but was rubbish to watch.
As for developing players, sorry but havent quite a few players who are considered somewhat attacking (Fleck, McFadden, O'Riordan, Fletcher, Maloney etc) all been developed in Scotland & eligible for the National team? Surely an improvement on Eammon Bannon or such like.
12

Rosscobhoy,

20/05/2009 17:45:08
I think the goals for and against argument is a bit of a sideshow. The real issue is the quality of the football on show and the entertainment value provided. That is not always the same as goals scored.
13

Dún Aenghus,

07/06/2009 16:04:25
There is however some entertainment in watching the antics of Laughferty and friends,induging in theatricals to get players sent off. lol!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.