Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Claim a Free Glayva Miniature

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Call for city to relax rules on building 'affordable' homes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 October 2008
PROPERTY experts today urged councillors to relax their rule that one quarter of all new homes built in Edinburgh are offered as "affordable" properties.
The city council was the first local authority in Scotland to stipulate how many properties must be low-cost or socially rented houses, and the policy has long been resented by some developers.

But industry experts today said the economic slowdown
means it is now starting to stifle investment in the Capital, with the credit crunch bringing the city's construction industry to a virtual standstill.

City housing leader Paul Edie said it is "misguided" to believe that scrapping the affordable housing quota will help kick-start the city's building programme.

Roy Durie, senior partner with Ryden property consultants, said: "Up until now, the council has relied heavily on its affordable housing policy, effectively requiring landowners to make available 25 per cent of their land free of charge to housing associations or registered social landlords. This slowed up the planning process considerably and, indeed, resulted in some developments not proceeding. This policy will have to be diluted."

A recent investigation by the Evening News found that work had started on only six of the 29 major developments in Edinburgh with detailed planning permission outstanding in September last year. Michael Halliday, associate director at property firm CB Richard Ellis in Edinburgh, urged a cut in the quota.

"Clearly, developers and investors are finding it very difficult due to the impact of the credit crunch and current market conditions, and as a result development is slowing in the city," he said. "In these challenging market conditions, it could be argued that the 25 per cent affordable housing policy acts as a barrier to development.

"A reduction in the percentage sought would help, but the council needs to balance that with the clear need to deliver more affordable housing for the city."

Jason Hogg, director of development land at property experts Jones Lang LaSalle, added: "The development world is tough enough as it is, without these requirements."

However, Allan Lundmark, director of planning at industry body Homes for Scotland, said: "With much new residential development effectively on hold as a result of the credit crunch, now is not the time for lengthy local authority policy reviews."

Senior councillors said there was enough land in the city to solve Edinburgh's housing crisis. They want the Scottish Government to provide enough money for registered social landlords and public bodies to provide the necessary 6677 homes.

Cllr Edie said: "I was very surprised to hear there are those who believe we should reduce the affordable housing component of new developments. Surely, considering the current economic climate, we should be building more homes for rent – as the likelihood of securing a mortgage grows smaller by the day."





The full article contains 473 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2008 11:01 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Alan B,

07/10/2008 11:38:10
Cannot see the point in that policy. Scotland housing stock has enough low end houses. The real problem is lack of middle class housing. This has forced the value of lower end housing up.
2

Scotish Exile,

07/10/2008 11:41:43
this is complete nonsense, every flat/ house is "affordable" to someone.
3

Buttress,

07/10/2008 11:52:49
"Clearly, developers and investors are finding it very difficult..."


Yeah - they don't like the policy as it restricts how much cash they make.

Snouts, troughs - any excuse will do.



4

Grumpy,

07/10/2008 11:57:45
I thought Edinburgh was already behind affordable homes - like all the ones at Ocean Terminal that are affordable by those on £100k plus annual salaries. What Edinburgh needs is more council owned or rental properies at reasonable rates that the less well off can afford.
5

Buttress,

07/10/2008 12:13:06
There is a clear definition of what 'affordable homes' means within this context.

6

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 12:14:10
1 has a good point. the scottish central belt is littered with grey unattractive ex council boxes, and now we are proposing to build more, to make people like me even more depressed.
7

Bigwull,

edinburgh 07/10/2008 12:27:33
build council houses
8

Saoghal Beag,

07/10/2008 12:28:02
Mario, if any one is repeating the mistakes of the very poor quality social housing of the sixties it is the bulk builders, throwing up middle class estates of shoogly shacks.

the number of new building applications dropped dramatically when the new space requriements came into being, ie a double bedroom must be able to take a double bed and leave room for furniture and for moving around the bed!

thought the plannners do not fully understand it endinburgh has implemented the 10% - 20% renewable generation on new build. developers are being mis-informed by consultants and the solutions are very expensive. the council need to revise this policy.
9

ccc,

07/10/2008 12:31:34
I think these so called property 'experts' are missing the point. Pretty much every home in Edinburgh is already about 20% cheaper than it was a year ago. We probably have at least another 30% to go before it bottoms out.

Edinburgh is becoming more affordable by the day.

Building 'affordable' housing will soon be pointless. It will be the same price as the flat next door.
10

Liz,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 12:45:33
#9
I agree, they are missing the point here.

Large swathes of Edinburghs housing is getting more and more 'affordable' the longer this 'credit crunch' (that we were told Edinburgh was immune to by some muppets in the paper very recently) goes on.

The only matter for debate is just exactly how 'affordable' will they get.
11

Buttress,

07/10/2008 13:00:12
http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/internet/Housing/Development%20and%20regeneration/CEC_affordable_housing_#WhatistheAffordableHousingPolicy
12

JT,

07/10/2008 13:01:14
Can the rules get anymore relaxed? Its not as if any legal procedings are set on the developers for not adhering to the required quota in previous developments. Ocean Terminal flats go for over 200K, Crewe Toll family homes from 360K, Quartermile flats 300K not affordable for majority of workers.
13

Buttress,

07/10/2008 13:07:56
Please do read the link which defines clearly what CEC considers is 'affordable housing'.


However, last week we were told that there isn't a problem with a 'credit crunch'...

http://www.independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/

Like the picture.
14

Jams,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 13:25:13
Where does Paul Edie think the money comes from to build affordable homes? Developers must make profit or they will not build. If they cannot make any money on 25% of what they build then the price for the other 75% must be higher.

So in simple terms the "affordable housing" policy of the council makes 75% of the housing more expensive.

So if you really do want to build affordable homes - build council houses (to quote #7 Bigwull)

15

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 13:45:56

#13 "Affordable housing" is for plebs - so what's your interest?
16

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:06:15
Well clearly I must be a pleb, to have some interest in policies which will ensure the not so rich can have somewhere to live, but one who has read the affordable housing policy and wishes others would too.

Some plebs are also 'key workers', but naturally we don't need those to live in houses do we?

They can sleep in doorways. All they are fit for, as they don't earn the vast salaries of property speculators. Must be their own faults.

17

Mr H 2u,

Embra 07/10/2008 14:15:03
I think you'll find that this is developers using the credit crunch to try and maintain the buckets full of cash they wallow about in daily. They've been making ludicrous amounts of cash for years with jerry built, over priced houses, and are loathe to lose their cash cows.

A 2 bedroom flat up at the new flats in Niddrie will set you back over £130,000. What the hell is affordable about that. A couple would need a combined income of £32500 to buy one, not an amount that call centre workers / shop staff can come up with.

No, it's the comfy, middle class definition of affordable that is used. Gits.
18

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:21:59


Do read today and yersterday's blogs:

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/2008_10_01_archive.html

(Affordable housing, definition of, is clearly stated on the CEC website...)

19

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:24:20
"What is the Affordable Housing Policy
Affordable housing is broadly defined in the policy as housing that is available for rent or sale to meet locally the identified needs of people who cannot afford to buy or rent housing generally available on the open market.

In the interest of integrated communities, and in response to the Council's Housing Needs Assessment, there is a need to develop a range of housing at sub-market prices. However, the primary requirement is housing for social rent. To reflect Edinburgh's identified needs, the policy's aspiration across the city and over time is for the proportion of housing for social rent to other forms of affordable tenure to be in the ratio 70:30. The affordable component of large sites should reflect this mix.

The affordable housing policy was reviewed in early 2006 and an amended version approved in June 2006. The practice note was amended in Autumn 2006."


"Who are Priority Clients for Affordable Housing?
Where the type of affordable housing being developed is in one of the categories set out below, the Council or RSL will give priority to tenants or purchasers who fulfill the following criteria.

A People with a local connection either through work, family or cultural networks;

B, C and D should apply in all cases

B The dwelling size is appropriate to the household size;

C Income levels low enough to show that they could not compete on the open market. Appropriate income levels may vary slightly depending on the size of home but as an indication we would expect that a priority purchaser would have a maximum total gross household income from all household members of £32,541 (maximum for single person household: £22,000). These income levels are informed by the median household income levels for working households in Edinburgh in 2006 and will change over time. Current levels are available from the Services for Communities Department. In line with the above incomes, a
20

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:24:54

a flexible approach will be taken with regard to single parents (who may require extra space) and purpose-built schemes for key workers where individuals may wish to share flats. In these circumstances the upper limit for an individual to qualify as a priority client is £32,541. Where the scheme is a form of low cost ownership, the maximum residual savings after purchase should not exceed £3,000 (though this can be reviewed in the event of the applicant being an older retired person);

D The priority purchase household resides in the house as their permanent home.

21

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:25:48
Types of Affordable Housing
Housing for Social Rent: defined as housing provided at an affordable rent and locally managed by a Registered Social Landlord (RSL). A RSL is a Housing Association, Housing Co-Operative or other housing body which is registered, monitored and regulated by Communities Scotland as a social housing provider. Rents should follow RSL rent policies which are subject to inspection by Communities Scotland. The average rent for a two bedroom social rented property in Edinburgh at October 2006 is approximately £55.00 per week. To qualify for subsidy, the Council will also require that design specifications meet Communities Scotland’s quality standards. Social rented accommodation should be available to households in housing need and will be allocated according to needs-based allocation systems administered by RSLs and/or the Council.

Housing for Mid-Rent: defined as housing with rents set at a level higher than a purely social rent, but lower than market rent levels, and affordable by households in the priority client group (see section 4). Guidelines for mid-rent properties in Edinburgh in 2006 are as follows:

1 bedroom: £70 – 85 per week
2 bedroom: £90 – 110 per week
3 bedroom: £120-140 per week
4 bedroom: £150 – 170 per week
Mid-rent housing is normally provided by a RSL, or other affordable housing provider agreed by the Council, with a local management presence. First preference will be given to households who are approved as a priority client group.

Shared Ownership: a form of tenure where the resident owns part of the dwelling and rents the remainder, usually from a RSL. With shared ownership the resident usually buys tranches of either 25%, 50% or 75% of the property. The owner has the opportunity to increase the proportion they own over time. First preference will be given to households who are approved as a priority client group.

Shared Equity or "Homestake": Homestake shared equity is designed to allow people wh
22

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:26:24


Shared Equity or "Homestake": Homestake shared equity is designed to allow people who don't earn enough to buy a property outright on the open market to get on the home-ownership ladder. A buyer can take between a 60% and 80% share initially, with a housing association holding the remaining 20% or 40%, and may increase that stake over time (although housing associations, in certain cases, may hold onto a 20% ‘golden share’ in order to retain affordable housing in perpetuity).

So, for example, if a property cost £100,000 you could purchase a 60% share for £60,000. The remaining 40% of the cost of the property would be held by the housing association. Unlike shared ownership, you would not have to pay any additional rent to the housing association and when you decided to sell the property you would be entitled to 60% of the final sale price of the house.

23

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:27:00
The scheme is funded through Communities Scotland and is subject to means testing. It is mainly aimed at first time buyers to purchase a property as their sole residence. The scheme is also available for potential purchasers whose personal circumstances have altered and who find that their existing properties are no longer suitable for them, and for current owner-occupiers whose homes are subject to demolition as a result of undergoing local authority regeneration plans.

The purchaser is wholly responsible for the repair and maintenance of the property and all other associated costs such as full council tax and insurance.

There are currently two versions of Homestake.

The first relates to new build projects with 60 units on the former gas works site at Granton being the prime example. Planning consent has been agreed and the first units are expected to complete in 2009. The exact prices have not been fully finalised but may be expected to start at around £93,000 for a one-bedroom property reaching around £138,500 for a three-bedroom property. Currently, to be eligible for one of these units, you would have to be earning a maximum of £22,000 if you are a single person and £32,541 if you are a couple. You would then have to demonstrate your ability to raise the appropriate mortgage amount with 3 separate lending institutions. We are not keeping a waiting list for this scheme. Please watch the website for updates.

The second version is described as Open Market Homestake as it allows a home seeker on a low income to buy a property that is on the open market in Edinburgh and the Lothians. It is a pilot project currently operating in Edinburgh and the Lothians that is administered through Link HA. Link can be contacted on 0131 557 0350 or via Home Advantage.

If you are seeking information on other options for shared equity low cost home ownership (LCHO) then check the Communities Scotland (CS) website and click on the link to Homestake on the right hand sid
24

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:27:45


If you are seeking information on other options for shared equity low cost home ownership (LCHO) then check the Communities Scotland (CS) website and click on the link to Homestake on the right hand side of the page.

Discounted Sale: a dwelling is sold below its open market value in perpetuity to households in the priority client group, and at a price affordable to them. The selling price must consider the maximum income level of the target priority purchase group. A section 75 agreementwill be necessary to ensure that future sales continue to be affordable to the priority client group, and that first preference will be given to purchasers within the priority client group. The Council may also opt to require standard securities over the properties. This will be assessed on a case by case basis. It will be the obligation of whoever allocates and approves the priority client group, most likely to be the Council or a RSL, to monitor this over time.

Where "owned" forms of affordable housing are being provided, the expectation is that developers will be required to advertise them in advance setting a date, time and place when reservations from potential buyers could be taken. This is most likely to be at a sales office or at a Council office. Applications will be taken on a first-come, first serve basis and will be assessed by the Council to ensure that applicants comply with the priority client criteria. If they do, the applicant will be offered the opportunity to purchase (or part purchase if shared ownership/shared equity). Note that legal agreements will be applied to the properties to ensure that discounts are applied in perpetuity i.e. this would affect the re-sale selling prices on such properties to ensure that the discounts could not be exploited in future sales.

25

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 14:36:13

#16 "The not so rich" - curious turn of phrase, missus.

D'you mean the not-so-rich as you?

What's your interest in plebs? Are you a philanthropist? If so, can you lend me a tenner, I want to rent a DVD and buy 6 cans of stella
26

Buttress,

07/10/2008 14:55:39
I think Buckfast might be a better choice for the likes of you.

I mean the not so rich as the people moaning that the council wants them to provide affordable housing and that means their profits can't be as fat.

27

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 15:47:36

#26 That Buckfast jibe's well hurt my feelings. keep up with the patronising claptrap. And labour voting
28

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 15:48:05
Maybe we can put the poor people in Greenland and have ryanair fly them over to tidy up / serve coffees etc. That way we dont have to listen to the rubbish they talk about "Strictly" and "football".

Just an idea.
29

Buttress,

07/10/2008 15:51:30
I suppose I could put a couple of them up in the basement of my ivory tower.
30

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 15:52:32
29 Up to you Buttress, I wouldnt. They drink and talk funny.
31

Buttress,

07/10/2008 16:06:01
They seem to be able to use a computer though.
32

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:12:47

Citiakulchur ehh saa junkikulchur

geezyir cross missus, geezyur cross
33

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:14:47

Ahm no a f_ckin jakey ahve goat a berghoss jaiket an a read cormac mccarthy novels when i'm no yished up on ra toniiiiic
34

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:15:36

AH'M NO A F_CKIN JAKEY AH'M WEARIN F_CKIN ROEBUCK TRAINIES AN A KIN WORK AN ASUS EEE LAPTOAP
35

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:17:25
SEE ME, SEE GOGOL'S DIARY OF A MADMAN

AH'M NO A MAD KUUNT, ITS JUST YOUTHFUL EXUBERANCE N THAT
36

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:18:41

What's a mistress?

- something between a Mister and a mattress.

What's a buttress?

-
37

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 16:23:25
This is the way i see it.

People eat sheep and goats after getting someone to kill them and chop them up.

I dont, personally. But I dont think that I have any responsibility towards people who are little better than sheeps and goat therefore , f i c k them . I would stop listening to their demands and just put them somewhere they cant get at people like me. If they do have to come to my place to tidy up or service me *in some other way* they should be equipped with pain causing devices which can be triggered easily, if they muck around.

This is the only way forward.
38

Buttress,

07/10/2008 16:25:38
I note that Joe Smith has certainly been at the Buckfast again.

Possibly he can come and 'service' you? It might keep him out of wider trouble.

39

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 16:27:23
He can polish my Doorstep for 50p then get back to his hovel, after stopping off to buy glue or needles. Money is wasted on the poor, better they work for nothing and accept that they will get a reward in the next life.
40

Buttress,

07/10/2008 16:29:06
He's quite literate however, possibly he can read aloud to you from improving works on occasions?



41

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 16:31:25
I already now all there is to now.
42

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:37:41

As Bob Dylan once said, (rightly, imho):

"I was so mad I wanted to bite myself"

Chronicles Vol.1 p.133

43

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 16:39:06

#40 "He's quite literate"

HA HA U R PROPER CONDESCENDING AND STUFF LIKE THAT
44

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 16:45:59
oh well thats another story mucked up beyond recognition. Poor buttress.
45

Buttress,

07/10/2008 16:50:36
I know. I have spent many a year perfecting it. The supercilious glare down the nose, past nostrils flaring at the stench of the unwashed, you will have to imagine.

However, I have noted that you can clearly read. There's even a spot of comprehension at times.

I do hope that you aren't one of those student types, of which Edinburgh has so many.

46

Buttress,

07/10/2008 16:51:07
Poor? My man who said I was POOR?
47

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

07/10/2008 16:59:29
45 oh jeezus no. Not a student. I'm a straight talking dadaist.
48

Buttress,

07/10/2008 17:01:25
No no not you - the other one.

The one who pretends he's in Moscow but in reality is in the gutter.
49

fresian,

edinburgh 07/10/2008 17:05:15
By affordable, I presume they really mean scheemie housing. Well why not let them live in mud huts. There is a plentiful supply of raw materials, so they should appeal to the eco nazis... In fact why not market them as "Eco homes", mention sustainability and biodegradable and you can sell them for a fortune.
50

Buttress,

07/10/2008 17:12:58
Sigh.

By afforadble it means what I printed out above.
51

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 18:15:29

#50 - "afforadble" eh? My, the lower middle classes who scraped and strived theor way through university and into an average salary job don't half know how to spell.

#50 - Moscow's in Ayrshire, you fool. I though even a pseud like you might have worked that one out.

#47 - ta for the 50p ahm aff tae get a packet of spikes for intravenous porpoises, and a bag of glue for to get a pure mental dunt aff it.
52

Joe Smith.,

California 07/10/2008 18:19:08

http://www.east-ayrshire.gov.uk/comser/my%20area/moscow.asp
53

Joe Smith.,

California 07/10/2008 18:24:40

#50 - No, I'm not a student. Are you a novelist?

The only ever course I did was standard grade thaumaturgy - by some f_cking miracle I managed to pass, despite huffing six bags of glue before the exam.
54

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 07/10/2008 18:27:18

#50 - You're not a fool really, kid. But you are a pseud :-)
55

Buttress,

07/10/2008 20:04:48
Nah, I can spell, I just can't type. Don't have a job though. But LOWER middle class? Now that IS offensive.

Did I mention where Moscow was or wasn't?

No.

Pseud? Pure PVC.




56

Joe Smith.,

California 07/10/2008 20:43:11

Buttress - yes, you didn't mention where Moscow isn't.

:P
57

elayne,

07/10/2008 21:48:00
edinburgh needs a lot more affordable housing,whether it be council or housing association and a much more stringent allocation policy(keep out the chavs/junkies and those with"social"problems)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.