Should safety helmets be made compulsory? No

By MALCOLM WARDLAW
Published on 03/06/2012 00:00

“THE Transport and Health Study Group completed an extensive review of cycling for its book Health on the Move 2. We concluded against the promotion of cycle helmets and strongly against their compulsion.

“One of the main reasons is that the risks of cycling are in the same range as for walking or driving. Young males face higher risks as drivers. A mile of cycling is typically safer than a mile of walking.

“In addition, the health benefits of cycling are large with the daily cycling benefits to health as much as giving up cigarette smoking.

“Helmet laws have not noticeably reduced serious head injuries, except by reducing cycling.

“An excessive focus on helmets adds ‘fear’ to the obstacles hindering a cycling revival.”

Malcolm Wardlaw,

executive member,

Transport & Health Study Group

Related Articles

• Cycling body withdraws support for events that encourage the use of safety helmets

  SCOTLAND’S leading lobby group for cyclists is to cease advertising events that insist on the compulsory use of safety helmets because it fears the measure puts riders off the sport and exposes them to potential danger.

  12 Comments