Book review: Britain’s Empire: Resistance, Repression and Revolt

Published on 26/10/2011 17:19

THE journalist and historian Richard Gott has long been tagged as “anti-British”, and even accused of links with the KGB. This pungent and provocative book will do nothing to appease his detractors.

BRITAIN’S EMPIRE: RESISTANCE, REPRESSION AND REVOLT

Richard Gott

Verso, £25

For Gott, the British people try to forget that their Empire was the fruit of military conquest and brutal wars involving physical and cultural extermination of subject peoples; from native Americans, Caribbean slaves, Irish peasants, and Indian princes, to the “sea gypsies” of the Mallacca Straits.

From the mid-18th century to the Great Indian Mutiny of 1856-58, Britannia used extreme violence to impose her rule: from the Raj, one Lieutenant Cracklaw wrote to his mother: “I think no more of stringing up or blowing away half a dozen mutineers before breakfast than I do of eating the same meal.”

Nonetheless, the white settlers who turned against British rule hardly emerge as paragons of liberal virtue: American settlers wanted independence because the British colonial power was thwarting their ambition to occupy native territory; at the end of their Great Trek, only the Boers would be free in the Orange Free State.

As for the self-pitying descendants of deportees to the “Australian gulag”, they put strychnine in flour for Aborigines, while, according to a contemporary account, “babies were murdered and maidens violated”.

This is not the kind of glorious “narrative history” that Michael Gove has been calling for in British schools. Indeed, Gott is explicitly countering the pro-imperialist tale by Henrietta Marshall in Our Empire Story, first published in 1908, and publication seems timed to coincide with Jeremy Paxman’s new work on Empire. Often Gott’s style has its own child-like simplicity. If famine and brutally suppressed rebellions colour our history, it is still difficult to assert that “Ireland was a colonial classic, exquisite in its simplicity”.

There is not enough here on the complicities as well as the conflicts between the British and their “subject peoples”, or on differences of opinion among the British themselves.

This rich compendium of revolt rarely compares Britain’s Empire with the equally sordid and genocidal French, Dutch or Belgian ones, while the selective memories of the “decolonised” suggest that even the most heroic of rebels tend to be swept into the sea of oblivion.

Related Articles

• turning the map tartan

  Scottish Empire

• Clock stops for Zimbabwe’s farmers

  BRIAN Alford yesterday laid off all 42 of his farmworkers and six contractors on his farm near Chiredze in Zimbabwe’s sugar belt near the South African and Mozambique borders. "I don’t see any alternative," he said as new laws came into force forbidding thousands of white farmers from producing food in a country suffering the worst famine and starvation conditions in Africa.

• The history man's burden

  AWAY from the Royal Albert Hall and the last night of the Proms, the dear old British Empire receives a pretty rotten press these days. We are no longer comfortable with the idea that Britannia’s writ ran over a quarter of the world’s population. The white man’s burden today is shouldering the guilty legacy of previous imperial adventures. In moments of acute self- flagellation we are prone to plead: forgive us for the sins of our fathers.

• Terror's quest for territory

  The New Order could never survive the contradictions in the Nazis' ideal of empire

• Book review: The Verso Book of Dissent

  Introduced by Tariq Ali Verso Books, £12.99