Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

An end to man's destruction of the 'web of life'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 October 2007
SCOTLAND'S seas contain some of the most special marine environments in the world, but they are almost completely unprotected from human exploitation.
Now a landmark report on conservation has identified 31 sites around the coast, including St Kilda, the Firth of Forth and Sound of Mull, which could become the basis for a network of marine reserves that would finally begin to redress this situation
.

The document, called "Finding NIMAs" (Nationally Important Marine Areas), highlights how these parts of our waters are valuable to Scotland and vulnerable to destruction, with the sea treated as a "common resource" available to all.

It says human activities are beginning to change the fundamental "web of life" under the waves and warns of the economic and environmental consequences if this is allowed to continue. Reserves, or "marine protected areas", would form a central plank of measures taken to reverse this trend.

The report, written for the umbrella group Scottish Environmental Link (SEL), says places of "exceptional biodiversity" and "nationally important marine wildlife", as well as feeding, spawning, mating and migration sites and representative areas of Scotland's key marine habitats should be safeguarded. New regulations "must provide for the restriction of some or all activities" in the zones.

The report says: "Scotland's coasts and seas are among the most diverse in the world, supporting around half of our biodiversity, much of which is of national and international importance. We all rely on this biodiversity. It forms the irreplaceable bedrock of human economic activities.

"There is scientific evidence that human activities, which treat the sea as a 'common resource', are altering the web of life that the sea supports. Like a forest where we have cut down all the trees and wonder why there is neither firewood nor birds, the sea is becoming less able to provide us with the fish and other natural resources our economy and wellbeing depend on. If we improve the overall management of the sea now, it will be better able to recover its health and productivity and we can help to ensure that we can fish and watch dolphins and other wildlife in future. Nationally important marine areas are part of this solution."

Scottish waters are home to colonies containing more than five million seabirds, nearly half the total in the European Union. More than a third of the world's grey seals live in Scotland and it is home to 29 species of whales and dolphins, including the world's most northerly bottlenose dolphin population, in the Moray Firth.

Scottish sea lochs, such as Loch Sween and Loch Etive, are a unique environment within the EU, with the likes of maerl beds, reefs of flameshells and horse mussels, communities of northern sea fans and coldwater corals.

The sea contributes an astonishing amount to our livelihoods: the value of its "ecosystem services" - food production and the flows of nutrients, material and energy - has been put at £14 billion. In more concrete terms, some £370 million worth of fish were landed by Scottish boats in 2006, while Scotland accounts for 90 per cent of the UK's farmed fish, with a "farm gate" value of £300 million. Scotland is also a leading destination for marine tourism, a growing industry that directly employs more than 2,500 people and makes £57 million a year.

But there are signs of trouble, with damage to important habitats on the seabed from dredging, important fish stocks below sustainable levels, salmon returning from the sea in ever fewer numbers, and repeated mass failures of seabird colonies to breed. Marine litter - which has been shown to cause vast numbers of sealife deaths worldwide - is also on the increase.

Calum Duncan, convener of SEL's marine taskforce, said: "Scottish seabirds, rare fish and seabed wonders which provide shelter for hundreds of species, are in decline and in urgent need of protection. Protection areas would help safeguard our marine natural heritage for future generations."

1 LOCH SWEEN

A NATIONAL Scenic Area, this loch is also "beautiful and biologically diverse" under the water. "Within this complex sea loch system, extensive maerl beds carpet tidal channels, mud shrimps farm bacteria in tunnels, tide-swept narrows harbour many species and bright green half-metre-long worms are found," the report says. "Loch Sween is a recognised high quality marine site, yet the features that make it special are not European criteria, there is no legal means to designate the site as nationally important and it remains threatened from human activities."

2 ISLE OF UNST

THE most northerly island in the British Isles, Unst has significant populations of cold water species, such as the sea urchin. It also has a wide variety of habitats that make the area relatively species-rich, including highly wave-exposed sites, others such as Bluemull Sound with strong tidal streams and rare brittlestar communities. Between the islands are sheltered conditions, voes and sounds. The island is important for seabirds, including the National Nature Reserve at Hermaness, and the area attracts large mammals including killer whales.

3 LOCH DUICH

THIS sea loch contains some of the largest beds of crofter's wig seaweed in the world but is outside reefs covered by a Special Area of Conservation (SAC).

Deep mud supports the "uncommon" tall sea pen, which is "vulnerable to langoustine-trawling and unprotected gravel habitats support the endangered fan mussel vulnerable to scallop-dredging".

The report adds: "This is one of only very few sites in the UK where the fan mussel, [pictured below], has been found inshore."

4 FIRTH OF CLYDE

THE Clyde is the most important site in Britain for eider duck and contains other important features. Loch Shira has the densest colony of fireworks anemones in Scotland. There are flameshell reefs at Port Ann; sheltered reef and deep mud communities throughout the Clyde sea lochs; maerl beds off Inchmarnock and in Lamlash Bay, Isle of Arran; an extensive seagrass bed in Whiting Bay; tideswept reefs off the Mull of Kintyre and Pladda and extensive areas of deep-burrowed mud in the Clyde basin.

5 SMALL ISLES (RUM, EIGG, MUCK AND CANNA)

THE waters around Canna support important communities of rare invertebrates, such as the burrowing sea anemone and red sea cucumber.

Rum hosts the world's largest breeding colony of Manx shearwater.

The waters of the Small Isles are one of the most heavily-used feeding areas in Scotland for minke whales and harbour porpoise.

A NIMA would protect important invertebrate species and habitats and could extend protection to critical areas for Manx shearwater, cetaceans and basking sharks.

6 GUNNA SOUND and off OIGH SGEIR

THESE two places were recently identified as hot-spots for basking sharks. Relatively high numbers of large sharks, some 30ft in length, and what were perhaps baby sharks, were observed for the first time in the same area. "Sharks could be gathering in these areas for courtship and breeding. It is promising that populations are reproducing after years of persecution, but basking sharks remain globally vulnerable and under pressure from wildlife tourism and by-catch in Scottish waters," the report says.

7 SOUND OF MULL

THE northern entrance to the Sound of Mull has some of the highest densities of harbour porpoise in UK waters.

The entire Sound is likely to provide a vital corridor for movement of species such as bottlenose dolphins and harbour porpoise.

The dense schools of fish here also attract a number of other species such as killer whales, common, Risso's, and white-beaked dolphins.

8 PENTLAND FIRTH

THE firth between the mainland and Orkney has some of the fastest tides in the world.

This is a fact not lost on the renewable energy industry and the area has attracted the attention of those looking to develop tidal power stations.

But its strong currents also stir up nutrients, generally increasing the amount of life in the area. It is also a pinch point of large marine mammals.

9 LOCH ETIVE

UNIQUE among Scottish sea lochs for its "unusually high inflow of freshwater", caused by the rock sill at the Falls of Lora.

The report says: "Several species are found in much greater abundance than in other sea lochs.

"A NIMA [Nationally Important Marine Area] would protect a unique nationally important sea loch that, being so enclosed, is particularly susceptible to excess nutrients and over-exploitation. Though species diversity in the loch is not high, many of the habitat types and the zonation of habitats and species are unique to Loch Etive."

10 MORAY FIRTH

THIS is an important breeding, nursery and feeding area for a resident population of bottlenose dolphins, the most northerly group in the world.

The inner firth is designated as one of a number of existing Special Areas of Conservation along with some sandbanks, but the Scottish Environmental Link report says protection would be improved if it become one of its proposed marine protected areas.

Also contains interesting geological features known as mermaids' tables and a nationally important area for wintering marine waterfowl.

11 ABERDEEN BAY

THIS is an important foraging area for breeding seabirds from nearby coastal areas.

It is also a hotspot for migratory birds and marine waterfowl spending the winter in Scotland.

The bay is also becoming one of best places in Britain to watch dolphins from the shore.

12 FIRTH OF FORTH

THE firth is an important feeding ground for the seabirds which breed on its islands and the surrounding area.

In winter it attracts marine waterfowl.

The report highlights the lack of protection for seabird-foraging areas at sea.

Wildlife lives alongside human activity such as shipping, marinas for yachts, coastal developments and dockyards.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 October 2007 10:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Save our Seas
 
1

inter alia,

22/10/2007 05:45:07

Re Firth of Forth. Don't try the shellfish. Don't know about t'others.

2

Boy Wonder,

22/10/2007 06:15:43

Dumping waste at sea, the oil spills, chemicals in the water overflows, ships sinking ... it's all got to have some effect.

I based the following verse on an old verse (used more than once) by the late Scaramouche, http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=112&id=199942007 who himself based it on the original from Mad magazine, who apparently ripped it off an American boy scout! The tune is My Bonny Lies Over The Ocean.

The fish are all sick in the ocean
The coral is dead in the sea
It's all because of man's pollution
There's no cod on my plate for my tea!

The Firths are important to Scotland
(Marine Parks or something I think)
The trouble is that all the pollution
Has screwed up them being carbon sinks!

3

Cadgers,

Perth 22/10/2007 08:03:54

#2 Good one BW

4

A Crofter,

Western Isles 22/10/2007 08:32:28

It's a fact - wherever you go on this planet:

Where there's muck,
There's folk!

Our First Minister was doing his bit only last week.... opening yet another vulgar oil company HQ.

And we should all remember that Scottish waters are the same waters as those surrounding NZ - it's all one sea. And I'm sick of picking up all those plastic bottles from the shore.

5

Last fish in the Clyde,

Clyde 22/10/2007 09:04:17

The Scotsman has at last woken up to to dire state of our seas, but has the scottish public, politicians & most importantly the governments civil servants?
Well done Ian Johnston, quite a change from 2 years ago when both the Scotsman & Herald rubbished The Royal Societies report asking for 30% of our sea's to be marine reserves.

6

bythesea,

22/10/2007 09:19:21

#2 BW - I'd like to put that on our website - are you agreeable - www.ssacn.org

One of the biggest problems for our inshore waters is that the management of them is skewed to favour those who exploit them in a non-sustainable manner.

Because of commercial pressure - a small area in Lamlash Bay cannot be set aside to protect that outlined in 4 above, nor can the exploitation of gravid Spurdog in Etive be stopped, nor is anything done about the horrendous discard rates in the Clyde.

These, and many more like them are wiping out Scotland's marine biodiversity.

7

westview,

Clyde tributary 22/10/2007 09:59:32

Most of our planet is covered in ocean. It is about time we ,as a species ,grew up and gave control of the seas to one body. Even the United Nations as a keeper of the high seas is better than the present Rubic's cube of laws and authorities system in place now. Let the UN decide what areas to preserve and what areas to exploit. Let the UN charge for licences to use the oceans potential for energy food or minerals. Let them charge for every gargo or person crossing over or under or on the oceans. The cash raised could pay for soldiers ,seamen and experts, to keep the peace and feed the hungry. At present nations are talking about extending their teritorial interests out to 350 miles from the coast. The improved technology now avalable allows nations to exploit further and further from their shores. This is causing dangerous arguments over rights and boundary lines. The seas around the North Pole for example, not to mention Rockall or the South China seas rocks and isles. Give it all to the UN before its too late.

8

Boy Wonder,

22/10/2007 10:47:53

#7. bythesea ... by all means do so. Thanks for asking. If you can please include the attributions appended. Credit where it's due is a principle I live by.

9

A Better Way,

22/10/2007 10:58:32

Exactly why Scotland needs to relaim our waters back from the European Union. Scottish Waters need to be managed by the stakeholders, and that is us the people who really care. How dare Maggie Thatcher and subsequent Westminster Governments give away our heritage to foreign vessels who's only purpose is to Rape them for profit and stuff their long term sustainability.

The next complaint is how dare the Scottish People let them do it. I'm sure they would make more noise if the breweries were on strike, or the Television System collapsed.

Get with the programme you now enjoy a bigger voice than you have had for 300 years. Stop taking any more being a second class citizen in our first class land.

Its our Time come the next election, lets fix things up for us and our ane. I would die a happier man if I knew that I had left our bairns a better future than one based on hand outs as the English say.

10

Gordon,

Edinburgh 22/10/2007 11:22:28

There's pollution, and then there's pollution.

Has anyone noticed that the problems with reduction in fish numbers came once the fishermen were banned from throwing the left-overs away? Marine life has been hit since then - as the food for the lowest forms at the bottom of the food chain has been reduced substantially by the lack of detritus.

11

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 22/10/2007 11:26:30

Is Boy Wonder the "resident poet" of these forums?

Since Canada has one of the longest coastlines in the world we will also be facing, or have been facing, the same problems as you in Scotland.

I admire the initiative in designating certain areas of your coastline as "NIMA's" and hope the scheme works.

GOOD LUCK and this may be an example to Canada, IF we don't have a similar scheme already.

12

Shellfishfarmer,

Inverness 22/10/2007 12:16:41

#12 You do have similar and better schemes developed by Parks Canada.
#11 You delude yourself if you think this problem is only a few years old. This has been a slow process of attrition over several hundred years with occasional catastrophic reductions. The overall problem has been masked because fishermen have always found another species or another location aided and abetted by the government agencie who have been behind the gear inprovement or have been behind the marketing of new product. With boats capable of going out in all but the very worst of storms and with radar and sonic technology which can spot any fish without great difficulty, we are finally coming to the stage where everything will be fished out unless we exclude all exploitation from certain areas. NMAs will allow full ecosystems to re-establish themselves and these will then become the seedbed and nursery areas for the whole ocean.

Don't be fooled by the other article by Joan Ruddock on climate change. It is happening and planktonic changes are taking place, but this is unlikely to affect the biological productivity of our waters. It may indeed increase the productivity if we give it a chance.

13

Boy Wonder,

22/10/2007 13:27:17

#12. No I'm not, Timothy. It's an open forum and according to the Hootsmon T & C, anyone is welcome to submit their posts in any form. (No ... not you Galactic Cornball!)

Do you have a problem with poetry and song? Do you lack those as well as humour?

14

Nellie,

Liverpool 22/10/2007 13:56:35

It may al be one sea but hat doesn't mean local efforts of preervation don't have an effect. The Beeb's Radio had a prgramme the other week where they featured some bloke who hdbuckets ofmo ney which he spent on acquriing an area of coastland (in Spain, I think)right next to a popular resort. While the sea bed at the resport was barren of life and littered with plasic bottles, just up the coast in his area, there were no plastic, lots of sea creatures and plentiful fish. Some varities of fish had even mutiplied sufficiently for him to allow limited fishing (no trawlers!) So we can think "small" and still make a difference ... and of course, if enough individuals, local authorities, governments did their bt to protect the coasts from pullution - however small that might be - the results can be big.

15

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 22/10/2007 14:20:57

We used to flush untreated sewage into the Firths + effluent from mines, mills, metal works, tanneries and dyers. Yet all these fish and species thrived as did commercial fisheries.

Modern pollutants may be more invisible and critical. You could create as many conservation zones as would make lawyers happy. But water flows and with it all the pollutants. What do you throw into your bin every day? What do you buy from Tesco? It all flows into the sea.

All the toxic biowarfare produced by the UK government and subsequent from WW2 was dumped in drums into the Irish Channel. It must have done some harm? You want the UK government to take control of the seas?

Where there's no commercial fishermen working the local grounds, I reckon anything will go into these touted marine conservation areas. Including nuclear waste. I doubt that it would harm the bright green half-metre worms of Loch Sween, but what of yourself and your children?

16

Sambo,

The deep south 22/10/2007 16:49:28

#13 I disagree that the problem has been going on for several100 years.
As a boy growing up on the Firth of Clyde I can remember fishing off Millport when its waters were teaming with fish and this was in the 1950's.
The dredging for scallops has ruined this area.

17

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 22/10/2007 21:07:29

#14 Boy Wonder

I think you underestimate me and have a skewed view of my personality.

It was a polite enquiry and DO have a sense of poetry and song. My sense of humour has been called sardonic and I am considered witty by those intelligent enough to understand my understated jibes.

I don't know whether you are serious in this constant criticism of me or just having a bad YEAR.

But you persistent encouragement and support for me are appreciated. Thank you.

18

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 22/10/2007 21:29:53

Scallop dredging 's been done for decades and decades but does it it kill any fish? It's rocks and stones that usually drop by the heads of the deck crew.

So a bit of sea bed 's been raked up but tides and currents do this too.

I expect the solemn hypocracy from those that only eat dive scallops (a short life for the diver) or Tesco chicken and salads. Or p'raps your a vegetarian that only eats stuff produced by cheap immigrant slave labour.

19

bythesea,

22/10/2007 22:05:24

Interesting question - does it kill any fish - directly probably very few, but as the dredges do wipe out habitats and reduce great swathes of the seabed to no more than barren areas - then I'd say on balance - yes they do.

Do they destroy more habitats than tide and current - well of course, no question - a storm may wipe out inshore habitat, but certainly not to the same depths nor extent as dredges.

If it wasn't a contradiction in terms I'd say dredges suck !

20

Shellfishfarmer,

Inverness 22/10/2007 23:18:51

#17 Sambo. You miss my point.

I too can remember plenty of fish in the Firth of Clyde, the Sound of Jura, wherever. But that was just before total catches began to decline in the seventies and eighties. The clincher in presenting evidence of the decline is to look at photographs of fish markets circa 1890. The fish caught were huge (one or two to a box). Such fish are more fecund than the usual size today. Its a biological principle illustrated well by the oysters I breed. A full grown adult oysters releases 1.5 milion eggs; a two year old releases about a tenth of that. So all those young and semi mature fish we saw 30 to 40 years ago were the last remnants of the large populations which inhabited our seas. Marine reserves are the most important option for the way forward.

21

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 23/10/2007 00:15:44

Hello A Crofter,


Well, well, well, I take it them my dear chappy, that you use NO OIL PRODUCTS at all in your life?
You surely do NOT own a car, truck, motorcycle, motorboat, or sail boat with a motor, or other vehicle with an internal combustion engine?

Further, you surely are not some low hypocrite which uses public transport, that billows oodles and oodles of toxins into the air, the water, and thence the sea?

Do you have or use any petroleum products in your house or office?; pens, ink, COMPUTERS, dish/laundry/personal soaps, linoleum floors, hoses, gaskets, sealers, etc., etc., etc.?

My dear fellow, you are a prime example of a knee-jerk Enviro-Leftist; devoid of common sense, a purveyor of double standards, and most assuredly someone who lives in a very brittle glass house, yet loves to chuck rocks.

The oil that comes out of the ground is what quite literally puts food on your table. You refuse to accept that FACT, but it cannot escape you, even though you try your best to ignore it.

I note also, that like the rest of the mindless Rad-Enviro Hordes, you don't consider the NATURALLY OCCURRING TOXINS, which the Earth itself is dumping into our seas;

Underwater volcanic eruptions, dumping BILLIONS of TONNES of toxins into the oceans, and into the air (gases DO rise last time I checked a physics text book).

Further, as more and more volcanic eruptions occur each year (and they HAVE been on the rise, we just do not know to what extent they've risen), the mean temperature of our oceans MUST also rise-all that heat from expelled magma has to go somewhere.

How about you take a moment, step back, put down the bong, and actually take the time to look at FACTS, rather than emotive dogmas which make you feel like a 'good person.'?

It might actually improve the planet.

Cheers from the Rockies.

22

A Crofter,

Western Isles 23/10/2007 08:35:09

What a pity that Clarksonesque eco-rednecks like the above Neanderthal75 have to persistently undermine this forum on marine conservation.

As you ask about my own oil consumption, let me tell you that I generate 99% of my electricity with a wind turbine, I do not fly and I have reduced my car use to less than 1,500 miles annually. Not perfect, but how about you?

Like many others in the real world, I'm doing this because I feel it is necessary for all of us to cut our excessive consumption of energy, food and manufactured products.

The oil industry causes more pollution than any other, so I believe that it is unethical and unsustainable. Loadsamoney, but an environmental disaster that is already a sad reality. Try telling residents of Beijing that their traffic-polluted air is just down to "emotive dogma" or volcanic activity.

Can you send me anything to put in the bong?

23

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 23/10/2007 09:32:49

Hello Crofter,

Cheers to you for cutting your consumption, but for most of the folks in the rest of the world, such is NOT the case.

I happen to SUPPORT Wind Generation (home to home, instead of just wind farms), as well as solar power, but the costs for being off the grid or significantly off the Grid, are NOT affordable, so long as governments keep spending money on Politically Correct money pits, instead of offering 100% tax deductible write offs for Wind and Solar generation, by individuals.

No, the politicians have MUCH more important things upon which to spend tax money; usually things that will pad their retirements.

Beijin and India do NOT have the environmental agencies, OR the independent rights groups, which we do have in the West.

This is PRECISELY why so many of us 'rednecks' were AGAINST Kyoto: everybody else is held to a tight standard EXCEPT two of the largest three polluters on the planet.

It's as if all the pro-Kyoto folks that wind and sea currents quite simply STOPPED at the borders of those countries.

The oil industry in the USA does NOT cause 'more pollution' than any other, and one can confirm those facts with the EPA, CDC, GAO, and others. American waters, fresh and salt are IMPROVING because of our laws, but alas, some of those laws went too far in restricting the ability of the USA to wean itself off of foreign oil.

Had we anyone with insight in Congress, we would have already had oil flowing from ANWR (Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge) and gas and oil flowing from off the shores of Florida and Virginia.

We could have already cut our dependence on foreign oil by at least a full 1/3.

Had you and others your way, untold human suffering would occur; people would lose their homes, children thrown into the streets, and that's just in 1st world countries.

2nd and 3rd world countries would no longer have population problems, because modern medicines, food stuffs, farm equipment,


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.