Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Talks call to halt public-service strike chaos



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 August 2008
SCOTLAND'S council employers offered to reopen negotiations with the unions last night in an attempt to avoid further disruptive strike action which paralysed services across the country yesterday.
Union leaders said an estimated 150,000 workers from the unions Unison, Unite and the GMB, took part in the one-day strike over pay which closed schools, left rubbish uncollected and disrupted ferry services.

Hundreds of schools were closed while
some of those which remained in operation were only open to some age groups. Even when schools remained open, in many cases there was no meals service.

The pay row centres on a rise of 2.5 per cent for each of the next three years, an offer unions say is "derisory" in the face of the rising cost of living.

In a separate dispute, Scottish Government civil servants in the PCS union staged a one-day stoppage over what they claim is an imposed 2 per cent pay rise.

A spokesman for Unison, the main local government union, yesterday said that further strike action was likely unless there was movement from the employers – the local government organisation Cosla.

Councillor Michael Cook, a Cosla spokesman, said: "

It is in no-one's interest for there to be further disruption, least of all the people in our communities who most rely on the services provided by councils and their employees. The only way to resolve this is by negotiation and I would urge the unions to meet us and to jointly reach a solution to the difficult situation that we all find ourselves in. We have always been willing to talk – that willingness remains the same."

Alex Salmond, the First Minister, has made it clear he believes increasing public-sector wage inflation will only deepen the economic slowdown.

However, John Swinney, the finance secretary, remained neutral on the issue and appealed to both sides to negotiate.

He said: "It is for the unions and local authorities to resolve this dispute and avoid further disruption to public services.

"That can only be done through negotiation and we are encouraging both sides to get round the table to reach agreement."

Edinburgh had 23 primary schools and three secondaries closed to all pupils, while other schools in the capital were closed to some age groups.

No trade waste was collected in the city centre – but the city's parking attendants remained on duty.

In Musselburgh, near Edinburgh, Unison said pickets agreed to an exemption request for staff to go back to work to protect an old people's residential home from flooding.

In Dundee, all nursery, primary and secondary schools were closed apart from one primary and a special school, while no bin collections or street cleaning took place.



The full article contains 459 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 August 2008 9:02 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

The Spook in Leith,

21/08/2008 00:29:18
I have absolutely no sympathy for those who go out on strike and leave some of the countries most vulnerable citizens at risk.

Privitise the lot of them, Ooops i got a slapped wrist the last time i said that by Conan the Librarian..

I bet if the staff at Scotmid, Asda, Farmfoods, Tesco etc went on strike there would be a bigger outcry
2

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 21/08/2008 09:39:47
COSLA said on NewsNight that it has always been willing to continue negotiations it is the unions who have precipitated strike action.
Could it be that the unions are taking their action mainly to try and thwart the Scottish SNP Government.
3

Peter Curran,

Kirkliston 21/08/2008 09:47:43
I made my living as a professional negotiator for many years, both as a practising negotiator and as a consultant and teacher in negotiating skills. There are two ways to approach the determination of terms and conditions of service of essential workers in the public sector - police, social workers, health workers, the fire service, etc.

One is to preclude industrial action by law: the quid pro quo for this must be some formula or formulae for maintaining equity in relation to the private sector and recognising the impact of cost of living increases, linked to binding arbitration in the event of disputes.

The other is to engage in free collective bargaining with trades unions as in the private sector. The implications of deadlock or breakdown of negotiations are then mediation, voluntary arbitration or facing industrial action. Faced with an employer who will not improve an unacceptable offer, unions have no other recourse but industrial action. It is vital to remember in this context that it takes two to tango - an employer refusing to improve unacceptable offer is accepting the certainty of essential services being denied to the public, and is jointly responsible with the unions for the resulting situation. The employer cannot escape this responsibility, and it is unfair and unjust to lay the blame solely at the door of the trades unions.

The conclusion is blindingly obvious - public sector workers should have their terms and conditions by comparability mechanisms and binding arbitration in the event of breakdown.

The current dispute will be resolved, as such disputes always are, by a settlement that could have been arrived at before the breakdown occurred. The only alternative explanations are, one, that the employers are incompetent negotiators, or, two, that the employers decided that a strike was a necessary prelude to persuading the unions to accept an improved, but tight settlement.

When the deal is reached, the public must ask the question -
4

,

21/08/2008 09:48:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Steven P,

edinburgh 21/08/2008 09:56:59
#4 Thanks for your contribution Peter.
I assume that you charged by volume when practising and teaching as a negotiator. Why use 20 words when 2000 will do - a classic dark art of the negotiator?
6

Peter Curran,

Kirkliston 21/08/2008 10:00:40
Steven P #4
Because I couldn't say what I wanted to say in 20 words - perhaps my failing. Your 20 word precis would be welcome.
7

Alan B,

21/08/2008 10:09:29
#Peter Curran

You limit the options to 2 but there are more.

In the private sector where they are un-unionised which is all companies and jobs i have worked in over the last 15yrs of my working life. The employer decides the wages end of story. The employer has to pay enough to get the quality of worker he wants and retain his/her services. Failure to pay adaquately and competitively will so lead to that employee if he has skills moving elsewhere.

As such you could easily make an argument that pulic sector workers really should not be unionised. Particiularly given the idea that unions are there to support the employee from the nasty bosses in the private sector.

You also seem to blame the employers for the dispute when many will look at this situtation and think that will jobs are being shed in the private sector, and the economic climate is particularly tight at the moment, that the settlement is decent enough in the current situation.


8

Alan B,

21/08/2008 10:22:41
#Peter Curran

Also while pegging public salaries to the private sector has certain advantages it would help to list the problems with that approach.

1)terms and conditions are completely different. Pegging salaries should meaning bringing these terms and condition closer. Pensions, early retirement, jobs for life (ie job security).
2)how do you peg. Even in the public sector how do you compare a doctor to teacher. Why do doctors get so much more etc? What jobs in private sector would you peg with as oppposed to what jobs teachers would be pegged to?
3)pegging within public sector has brought problems with equal opportunities from what i have heard. By grading say a gardener with a cleaner, we now have claims of unequal pay disputes between genders that the councils are ridiculously having to pay for. The problem is where a gardener earns more than a cleaner. As cleaners tend to be women and gardeners men we have ridiculous gender equality pay claims.
4)how u peg can change with the type of government and the importance a government puts on that job.
5)pegging can cuase problems with recruitment. Say dentist. If you have recruitment issues you may have to compete for denists not just pay according to some outdated pegging. ie it leads to a lack of flexibility. Another example IT professionals in public sector. The levels of pay a determined by whether the skills level the public sector want to recruit.
9

Peter Curran,

Kirkliston 21/08/2008 10:54:35
AlanB #7 and 8
You use the term 'pegging', Alan - I don't advocate this. What I said was some formula or formulae for maintaining equity in relation to the private sector and recognising the impact of cost of living increases. There are well-established job evaluation techniques for establishing the relative ranking of jobs, and for determining work of equal value. A lot of women have successfully used this legal option to correct the disgraceful, long-term sex discrimination in remuneration by some employers, and I am delighted for them and applaud their determination.

You argue the option of a non-unionised public sector workforce. In a no-strike, formula-based system, the collective bargaining aspect of the trade unions role would be certainly be significantly reduced, but their wider functions, in grievance handling, health and safety, etc. would still be relevant.

I think I recognise where you are coming from, and where your values are, in your statement "The employer decides the wages - end of story. The employer has to pay enough to get the quality of worker he wants and retain his/her services. Failure to pay adaquately and competitively will so lead to that employee if he has skills moving elsewhere."

We had that system in Victorian times, with entirely predictable results - appalling poverty, ruthless wage cuts, starvation and the workhouse. If you think that can't happen today, look at the conditions of unorganised migrant labour and the behaviour of the gangmasters. It was to escape from the brutality and inequity of "the employer decides the wages end of story" that the unions came into being. They are enfeebled at the moment, but if they can free themselves of their links to the Labour Party, and being dragooned into being unwilling cannon fodder in Labour's unionist attack on the present Scottish government, they can perhaps recover their self-respect.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.