Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


General discontent

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2009
GENERAL Sir Mike Jackson claims that "it was more cost-effective to defend the British Isles" than if it was "broken up" (your report, 30 June).
It may come as a surprise to him that the British Isles was "broken up" decades ago, when the Republic of Ireland was formed. If he truly believes that a common defence of the British Isles is more cost-effective and increases security, then, instead of preaching to the people of Scotland, he should take his message to the taoiseach of Ireland.

MICHAEL N CROSBY

Muiravonside

By Linlithgow, West Lothian






Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2009 8:48 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Mark Boyle,

Johnstone 04/07/2009 12:28:04
It's a farce anyway, as more Republic of Ireland citizens join the British armed forces than will join their own token defence force (the IDF - whose budget was smaller then even that of the Provisional IRA at their height), since it's not exactly a secret that in the unlikely event of Ireland ever being threatened by a foreign power, the British Armed Forces would instantly step in.

For better or worse, the British Armed Forces have remained a British Isles armed forces in practice, as well of course with invaluable help from the Nepalese!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.