HUNDREDS of women given faulty breast implants gathered yesterday at a French court for the trial of five executives accused of using cheap industrial silicone in their manufacturing.
Jean-Claude Mas, who founded and ran implant maker Poly Implant Prothese (Pip), is among those accused.
The now-defunct company had claimed its factory in France exported to more than 60 countries and was one of the world’s leading implant makers.
The implants, which officials say are prone to rupture and leaking, were given to more than 125,000 women worldwide, 42,000 of them in Britain, until sales ended in March 2010. Of those, more than 5,000 are joining the trial as victims, saying the executives misled them into believing the implants were safe.
Nathalie De Michel, who had the implants, said that she wanted Mas to acknowledge responsibility.
“We have the impression that he doesn’t care. I want him at least to recognise that he made mistakes. When you fight against cancer, you fight to survive; and if, after, they put some garbage in your body, what’s the point of fighting for life?”
Mas declined to comment as he entered the court in Marseille to face the women.
The vast majority of the implants were for cosmetic reasons. The rest were for breast reconstruction, often following cancer surgery. Within France, about a quarter of the implants malfunctioned, most by rupturing and leaking silicone, according to a government tally released earlier this month.
Doctors and scientists who have followed the case say medical complications stemming from the ruptures and leaks appear to be limited, even when the implants rupture – rashes and localised pain were the most common complaints. But lawyers for the women – more than 300 from around the world who joined the month-long trial – say the full effects will not be known for years.
Nataly Lozano, a Colombian lawyer who said she represents 1,500 women who have had problems with the Pip implants, said she came to Marseille to seek justice for clients who lack the resources to pay for follow-up care.
“I could name very difficult cases of women who don’t even have means to undergo exams and know what state their implants are in,” she said.
“They know that they are dangerous implants, and nevertheless they don’t even have a way to know if their implants are broken inside their body, if eventually this substance will leak into their body.”
The French government recommended that women have their Pip implants removed as a precaution, and about a third have followed that advice.
In Britain, the government left the choice up to women and their doctors, but recommended that the implants be removed if there was a sign of rupture.
The company went out of business, and regulators across Europe began demanding tighter oversight of medical devices.
Mas has said that he is ruined financially.