William Hague insists withdrawal from Afghanistan is on schedule

Published on Thursday 9 February 2012 14:21

BRITAIN and its American allies remain committed to the timetable for withdrawing combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014, William Hague said today.

The Foreign Secretary said there would be a phased transfer of responsibility to the Afghan National Army.

He said he expected local troops to take “lead responsibility” during 2013.

Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander had raised concerns in the Commons about comments from US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta about a US withdrawal from combat roles in 2013.

Mr Alexander said: “Mr Panetta only last week said ‘hopefully by mid to the latter part of 2013, we will be able to make a transition from a combat role to a training and advice and assistance role’. This comment was confirmed by the Prime Minister’s official spokesman.

“Given the integrated nature of ISAF’s work, both in Helmand and across Afghanistan, are you seriously suggesting British military personnel will be involved in combat operations for potentially between a year and 18 months after our American allies have transferred from combat operations to providing training and advice and assistance?”

But Mr Hague said there was no difference in position between the allied countries operating in Afghanistan.

He told the Commons: “The US Defence Secretary has stressed US forces will remain combat capable and ready in Afghanistan to the end of 2014. He has also said very clearly we have got to stick to the Lisbon strategy - the United States has a very strong commitment to Lisbon and to the strategy that was laid out there.

“That is a strategy that involved withdrawing from a combat role after the end of 2014.

“Sometimes in the reporting of comments there is confusion between lead responsibility and full responsibility.

“We expect Afghan forces to have lead responsibility across Afghanistan in mid-to-late-2013 and indeed they have lead responsibility for many operations now in Helmand.

“Full responsibility, that is full transition to Afghan security control is from the end of 2014.

“We are not conscious of any difference on this between the approach of the United States and their intention for their armed forces, and ours. Nor would we want there to be any difference.”

Making his quarterly update on Afghanistan to the Commons, Mr Hague said there had been steady progress in Afghanistan in recent months.

In December, an international conference in Lisbon met to agree a strategy for moving forward towards withdrawal.

He said a series of meetings, including a visit to the UK by the Pakistan foreign minister on February 21, would continue to work on improving the situation in Afghanistan.

Mr Hague told MPs: “Serious challenges remain in Afghanistan. There will undoubtedly be setbacks and difficulties ahead but we are making steady progress.

“In 2012, it will be an important year to consolidate this progress and strengthen the international commitment to Afghanistan and long term partnership with its people.”

Comments

There are 2 comments to this article

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 1

• 1
• Show all

2

KINGFISHER1

Friday, February 10, 2012 at 10:43 AM

1 talks in terms of THOW OUT. THAT is confirmed. I am agreed that the UK troops should have been removed from Afghanistan years ago. I have no interest in the US position.If the US wishes to be bellicose and belligerent, it can did it on its own. WE will review OUR position on the US only when it DEMONSTRATES a correct Understanding. It is REMOVED from OUR safe travel destination list. ALL of it INCLUDING the RESERVED territories! THE TECHNICAL POINT, if WE are being very PARTICULAR!!! Afghanistan ,and its associated territores have not been on the safe destination list for over 1000 years. THAT REMAINS!!! FINAL!!!

• Report Unsuitable

1

Hector the Lessor

Friday, February 10, 2012 at 07:38 AM

No Mr Hague, it should happened yeasterday. Not only do you have Islamic Terrorists trying to do their own thing in the UK, but you have UK troops on a hiding to nothing in Afghanistan. Bring the UK troops back home and send the Afghans in the other direction. It could be a UK first but reckon it will never catch on.

• Report Unsuitable

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 1

• 1
• Show all

Logged in as:

Comment here. Start typing your comment here:

Post comment

Please adhere to our Community guidelines

Your view

Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.