Blackpool’s exploding tram behind rejection of ‘cheaper’ option

Published on Monday 6 February 2012 12:00

TRANSPORT chiefs have finally revealed why they did not take up an offer to complete Edinburgh’s scheme all the way to Newhaven – and pointed to an exploding tram in Blackpool.

The Evening News revealed last month that light-rail company Trampower had offered to build the complete line to Newhaven within the same £776 million budget while causing less disruption.

But council officials have now highlighted an incident in a 2007 trial of Trampower vehicles, when one developed a fault and burst into flames, as one of the reasons the bid will be going no further.

Today, Trampower’s technical director, Professor Lewis Lesley, hit back by claiming the tram fire was “industrial espionage” and that it was irrelevant as it involved a vehicle rather than the track.

Councillor Gordon Mackenzie, the city’s transport leader, however, was adamant the city has made the right decision.

He said: “For contractual and technical reasons, I do not think Trampower’s offer is credible. We are in a contract with Bilfinger Berger and Prof Lesley knew that when we spoke to him.

“On the technical part, the [Trampower] LR55 rail is pretty unproven. They have had a small short section in Sheffield for years but no-one else has adopted that.”

Regarding the Blackpool tram fire, Cllr Mackenzie said: “What Trampower are proposing is track, not vehicles, but they have made claims in the past about being able to deliver vehicles and clearly that has been shown to be problematic for them, so it casts doubt on other claims they have given.

“I’m not writing it off because they have had problems with vehicles, I’m just saying it does not give sufficient confidence in what they can deliver.

“Frankly, the lack of substantial evidence that this would work in Edinburgh, on top of the contractual position, means it is not a credible option.”

City leaders only said at the time that they took the view that the construction consortium headed by Bilfinger Berger remained “best suited” to build the Edinburgh tram system

But it is now understood that officials have carried out extensive work into Trampower’s ability to provide the deal.

Prof Lesley today insisted that his figures were realistic – and said the fire in Blackpool had nothing to do with the proposals for Edinburgh, where the company wanted to build a track rather than the trams.

He claimed that the fire was down to “industrial espionage”, and added: “158 cars catch fire every day in Britain.

“If anybody is worried about a tram fire, which is very rare, they ought to not worry as it is more likely they’ll have a fire in their car.” Prof Lesley proposed an “LR55” track that he said would result in much less of the road needing to be dug up, as it lays a large kerb that the tram track effectively sits in, meaning virtually no utility diversions would be needed.

BRUM DEAL FOR CAPITAL FLEET FIRM

The Spanish firm that built Edinburgh’s tram vehicles has been chosen to build a fleet for the Midlands.

CAC was responsible for building the 27-strong fleet of Edinburgh trams lying in storage at Gogar and West Lothian while officials press ahead with getting the scheme back on track.

The firm has now also been named as preferred bidder for the new Midland Metro, to supply up to 25 Urbos 3 trams in a deal worth in the region of £40 million.

The deal has been agreed following a decision to extend the tram line by nearly one mile in Birmingham.

Comments

There are 9 comments to this article

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 1

• 1
• Show all

9

WJohn

Thursday, February 16, 2012 at 01:53 PM

Oh, come on. Surely Sarah B did not swear?

• Report Unsuitable

8

WJohn

Thursday, February 16, 2012 at 01:52 PM

Building of any more wind turbines to be blocked because of the disasters on Scottish Wind Farms. Cruise liners are to be barred from Scottish waters because of Italian disaster. Scottish Lords to be banned because of burning curtain episode. Please add your own.

• Report Unsuitable

7

Jimmyharkins

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 12:25 PM

The Trampower vehicle that went on fire (not exploded) was a prototype, prototypes are designed to find faults, defects and other risks including fire risks. The Mercedes bendy buses of which there there are thousands in service were and still are bursting into flames altho most have been rectified. I agree with #1 & 2, the fire is not the real reason behind the decision. Trampower is a new entrant to the industry and as such has no track record for product liability etc., but there are bonds on the market which could cover the product. The advice given to CEC was not of the best and we are paying for those errors

• Report Unsuitable

6

SarahB

Monday, February 6, 2012 at 11:31 PM

Comment removed by moderator

5

B K

Monday, February 6, 2012 at 05:29 PM

"CAC was responsible for building the 27-strong fleet of Edinburgh trams lying in storage at Gogar and West Lothian while officials press ahead with getting the scheme back on track. " Gaelic speakers will be having a good giggle at this.

• Report Unsuitable

4

Account deleted

Monday, February 6, 2012 at 01:53 PM

Yeah this is the real reason the trams are over budget, this one example in blackpool. Next one please. Thats like never flying a plane again because of a crash, or ever driving in your car because of a mechanical fault once. The vast majority of this council must really think we are so stupid.

• Report Unsuitable

3

freeesian

Monday, February 6, 2012 at 01:45 PM

Are they going to sack BB after their tunneling brought down the archive building in cologne?

• Report Unsuitable

2

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head

Monday, February 6, 2012 at 01:13 PM

Why do politicians in all walks of life think that they can get away with talking total bulls**t all the time and that people are stupid enough to belive them? The fire in the tram has nothing whatsoever to do with the decision not to engage Trampower on this project and it never has had anything to do with it. The shady wheeling and dealing, together with the insane, pig-headed policy making behind this ludicrous project is, and always will be, beyond me. All I do know is that the politicians who are running it frequently insult the intelligence of all and sundry by coming out with such outrageous lies. Why are they afraid of telling the truth? Why do they refuse to impliment the wishes of the vast majority and scrap this insane project now?

• Report Unsuitable

1

freeesian

Monday, February 6, 2012 at 01:09 PM

Cllr McKenzie said "so it casts doubt on other claims they have given"....mmmm, rearrange the folowing words to mak a popular phrase or saying: pot, block, kettlel, calling.....

• Report Unsuitable

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 1

• 1
• Show all

Logged in as:

Comment here. Start typing your comment here:

Post comment

Please adhere to our Community guidelines

Your view

Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.