Mars barred as Nasa set to slash budget for Red Planet
THE dream of crossing the final frontier in search of life on Mars has been dashed after Nasa announced that financial cutbacks have forced it to scale back on missions to neighbouring planets.
Yesterday the space agency’s former chief scientist criticised Nasa’s “irrational” plan to save money by cutting back on its exploration of the red planet.
Edward Weiler, who was the space agency’s associate administrator for science until September, said the decision was “unjustified” and the reason he left the agency last year. Scientists believe Nasa is about to propose major cuts in its exploration of other planets, especially Mars.
With limited money for science and an over-budget new space telescope, the space agency had to make a choice about where it wanted to explore – the neighbouring planet or the far-off cosmos.
Two scientists who were briefed on the 2013 Nasa budget that will be released next week said the space agency is eliminating two proposed joint missions with Europeans to explore Mars in 2016 and 2018.
Nasa had agreed to pay $1.4 billion for those missions. Some Mars missions will continue, but the fate of future flights is unclear, including the much-sought flight to return rocks from the red planet.
More than $200m in those cuts are in the Mars programme, they said. The current Mars budget is $581.7m.
“To me, it’s totally irrational and unjustified,” said Mr Weiler. “We are the only country on this planet that has the demonstrated ability to land on another planet, namely Mars. It is a national prestige issue.”
Mr Weiler said he quit last year because he was tired of fighting to save Mars from budget cuts. He said he fought successfully to keep major cuts from Mars in the current budget but has no first-hand knowledge of the 2013 budget proposal.
Mars “has got public appeal, it’s got scientific blessings from the National Academy”, he said. “Why would you go after it? And it fulfils the president’s space policy to encourage more foreign collaboration.”
Nasa spokesman David Weaver said the space agency had to make “tough choices ... and live within our means”.
He added: “Nasa is reassessing its current Mars exploration initiatives to maximise what can be achieved.”
One of the big problems for Nasa’s science budget is the replacement for the wildly successful Hubble Space Telescope. Scientists at Edinburgh University are among those working on Euclid, a satellite which is the successor to the Hubble telescope, which will go into solar orbit between Earth and Mars in 2019.
The James Webb Space Telescope, which would be about 100 times more powerful and would gaze farther into the universe than ever before, is now supposed to cost around $8bn. The original estimate was $3.5bn. The other big part of Nasa science spending, Earth sciences, – is not being cut
- Family mourn death of Glasgow ‘fight’ schoolboy
- Rangers takeover: Duff & Phelps threaten legal action against BBC
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
- Rangers administration: Fans fear Duff & Phelps claims could scare off Green
- Rangers takeover: triple penalty punishment enough, says Johnston
- Alistair Darling leads ‘No to independence’ fight over tea and biscuits
- Scottish independence: SNP flip-flops over Nato
- Scottish Independence: SNP ‘won’t be Yes campaign’s only voice’
- Scottish independence: Alex Salmond’s pledge to sign up 1m voters
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Edinburgh
Sunday 27 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 10 C to 22 C
Wind Speed: 12 mph
Wind direction: North east
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 12 mph
Wind direction: North east


Comments
There are 7 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
GibsonNSW
Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 09:24 AMNASA would pour all of the worlds mineral wealth and human strength into getting to the planets in this system...and leave behind a raped and mostly dead planet. It cant be done! Its a false vision! It never could be done! The wars are catching up with the time thats left.
GibsonNSW
Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 09:20 AMThey couldnt make it anyway. Exploration is not on the Bible calendar... and The Book of Revelation is. The West ought to read Revelation 9:16 and 16:12 and get ready for China and the great eastern army.
Dennis Nilsson
Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 12:58 AMI think anyone that argues against science and exploration as a waste of money is about one step away from retarded. As a species ours is very inquisitive and one of our great abilities is our ability to use science. It's what seperates us, from animals and creates our ability to foster technology. Science and exploration is the only one way to improve lives around the world. Please check out Robert Zubrin in his awsome and inspiring documentary "Mars Underground": http:www.youtube.comwatch?v=xfMtRn5Ylfc
Hari in England
Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 03:44 PMComment removed by moderator
JimA3220
Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 02:34 AMComment removed by moderator
Bazza Matazz
Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 02:09 AMComment removed by moderator
antiparasite
Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 01:48 AMComment removed by moderator
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.