Give judiciary in Scotland equal powers, urges judge
The High Court knows the community, said Lord Hamilton
SCOTLAND’S most senior judge has intervened in the Supreme Court row and urged Westminster to give the justiciary north of the Border equal powers to the rest of the UK.
In a letter to the UK parliament, Lord President Lord Hamilton argued the High Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh is better placed to deal with Scottish criminal appeals.
He backed Lord McCluskey, who led a review on the Supreme Court’s role in Scottish law, in saying appeals should only be referred to London with the agreement of judges in Edinburgh.
If the UK government agrees and uses the Scotland Bill to change the current law, it would close the route used in such high-profile cases as Peter Cadder and Nat Fraser.
“Being closer than a court of further appeal to the day-to-day operation of criminal jurisdiction [the High Court in Edinburgh] will, I suggest, have a better appreciation of the operation of the criminal law in the community it serves,” Lord Hamilton wrote.
He went on to say that the Supreme Court’s “talents are best directed, as a court of reference”.
That, he pointed out, would see Scotland adopt a similar position to the high courts of England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Lord Hamilton’s view has been welcomed by the Scottish Government although, like Lord McCluskey, he does not suggest that Scotland should be able to bypass the Supreme Court altogether, and refer cases direct to Strasbourg, as Scottish ministers have proposed.
He also said that European Convention on Human Rights appeals should be made against courts – and not just actions of the Lord Advocate.
“An anomaly of the present jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in criminal devolution issues from Scotland is that they can arise only if the Lord Advocate has acted [or failed to act] in a way which, arguably, infringes the convention rights of an accused or appellant,” Lord Hamilton wrote.
“That is notwithstanding that the High Court, as a public authority, cannot lawfully act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right.”
In his conclusion, he added: “I urge parliament to provide in the Scotland Bill an amendment to the Scotland Act 1998... to restrict those cases in which leave may be granted to appeal to the Supreme Court to cases in which the High Court has certified that a point of law of general public importance is involved in the decision.”
Lord Hamilton’s intervention comes a week before the Scotland Bill is to be discussed in the House of Lords.
A spokesman for the Scotland Office said it would “consider the points raised by Lord Hamilton carefully”.
He added: “There is substantial support for the government’s position on this matter, and the issue will be considered fully in the House of Lords, during the Scotland Bill proceedings.”
A spokesman for the Scottish Government added: “We welcome the Lord President’s intervention which underlines the seriousness with which the matter is being treated by the Scottish judiciary and support his view.
“We call on the UK government to listen to Scotland’s finest legal and constitutional minds who agree that the role of the Supreme Court in Scottish criminal cases must be redefined, putting Scottish courts on an equal footing with those in the rest of the UK.”
However, leading human rights lawyers fear such a change will close off an important route which has benefited Scots law.
John Scott, QC said: “With Cadder, it’s hard to see how that would have made it to the Supreme Court, and therefore how Scotland being out of line with the rest of Europe would have been sorted out.”
Email to a friend
Print this page- Alan Pattullo: Dignity, not sanctimony, is required at Parkhead
- 300 jobs at risk as Ryanair axes five Edinburgh routes
- Suzanne Pilley trial: I kissed her goodbye then never saw her again, says would-be lover
- Rangers administration: Craig Whyte’s promise to step aside and hand Rangers over to fans ‘ludicrous’
- David Cameron is playing into the SNP’s hands, says Michael Forsyth
- Scottish independence: Spectre of border controls raised by top Tory
- David Cameron is playing into the SNP’s hands, says Michael Forsyth
- Scottish independence: Alex Salmond hits back at Tory ‘Bourbons’ in battle over devo-max
- Scottish independence: Anti-Scottish jibes boost separation, Michael Gove warns Right
- Scottish independence: Let Scotland vote on independence in 19 months, says Michael Moore
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Edinburgh
Thursday 23 February 2012
Today
Light rain
Temperature: 7 C to 14 C
Wind Speed: 26 mph
Wind direction: South west
Tomorrow
Sunny spells
Temperature: 5 C to 10 C
Wind Speed: 29 mph
Wind direction: West
Comments
There are 6 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
THE MASK
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 01:31 AMThe simple truth is as always the laws an ass,and for judges dont get me started,they dont have a clue.They are in need of a reality check,of the highest order with their stupid wigs and cloaks what is all that about,its 2012 for god sake.Just do the job and make sure the punishment dished out fits the crime,how hard can it be.!!!!
Kennij
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 08:41 PM2 Kon 1 Kinghob, erm, read the act of union, the law of Scotland is the responsibility of the UK.------- Only for just now.
Kon
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 05:08 PM3 and I'm not making this up, yeh yeh ye, the point is the Scottish system is dysfunctional and none of the judges have a scobbies about human rights and the politicians have no desire to change the laws
and I'm not making this up
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 04:46 PMComment removed by moderator
Kon
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 04:19 PM1 Kinghob, erm, read the act of union, the law of Scotland is the responsibility of the UK
Kinghob
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 03:49 PM“With Cadder, it’s hard to see how that would have made it to the Supreme Court, and therefore how Scotland being out of line with the rest of Europe would have been sorted out.”----------------------that's not up to you, or tony blair to 'sort out' Scotland's Laws.
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.