Political morality

2
Have your say

Bob Taylor (Letters, 27 November) supposes holding “the balance of power” in Westminster is a main Nationalist party objective.

Rather, the primary purpose of a “Yes alliance” would be 
to scupper the Scottish Labour Party.

This is the kind of amoral attitude which could easily alienate a large number of voters.

Isn’t what is being considered a form of organised large-scale tactical voting inimical to democracy?

Moreover, it raises a significant practical moral issue of being transparent and accountable to the electorate.

Can it be morally acceptable to bring together such a pot-pourri of political philosophies and policies?

Arguably, political parties should have moral principles which for the sake of power they won’t compromise.

Ellis Thorpe

Old Chapel Walk

Inverurie

Back to the top of the page