Weak argument

It’s all very well for Christine 
Jardine (Perspective, 1 February) to claim that the referendum choice is “no longer between independence and the status quo” in opposition to Nicola Sturgeon’s justifiable claim that “a No vote is a vote for nothing”.

Ms Jardine’s trumpeting of the Liberal Democrats’ long-term so-called commitment to a “federal UK” would have been more convincing if her party had campaigned for the inclusion of a federal or quasi-federal option, approximating to “devo-max” in the referendum ballot paper.

But no such luck. Like their Labour and Conservative comrades in the Better Together campaign, the Lib Dems – under Willie Rennie’s utterly uninspiring leadership – were much more interested in the prospect of giving Alex Salmond and the SNP a presumably metaphorical “bloody nose” in next year’s referendum than they were – or are – on improving the governance of Scotland.

So, I’m with Nicola Sturgeon all the way on this one. At least – unlike the Lib Dems – she does not speak with a forked tongue on the constitutional issue. The Lib Dems should try it some time, but I’m not holding my breath.


Clarence Drive





Back to the top of the page




In partnership with

Complete coverage of the festivals. Guides. Reviews. Listings. Offers

Let's Go!

No Thanks