DCSIMG

Law ignored on minimum alcohol pricing, court told

The Scotch Whisky Association is launching an appeal against a court judgement that sided with the Scottish Government over alcohol minimum pricing. Picture: PA

The Scotch Whisky Association is launching an appeal against a court judgement that sided with the Scottish Government over alcohol minimum pricing. Picture: PA

  • by CATRIONA WEBSTER
 

The Scottish Government did not take European Union law into account in planning a minimum price for alcohol, a court has been told.

A legal challenge against the legislation, which would see a minimum unit price of 50p brought in north of the Border, returned to court yesterday.

The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) took action against the policy, which it argues would breach EU trading rules, after MSPs passed it in 2012.

Judge Lord Doherty rejected the challenge in May last year, ruling that the legislation was compatible with UK and EU law.

An appeal began at the Court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday. The association is joined in the action by Spirits Europe and the CEEV, the federation of European wine producers.

Setting out the case, Aidan O’Neill QC said a “fundamental failure” of the Scottish Government’s case was its focus on health evidence, as opposed to the effect on imports from other member states. The policy had been “dreamed up” by health advisers with no consideration given to its lawfulness, he said.

Mr O’Neill said: “It is accepted that justification has to be made out in this case and that is because the Scottish ministers accept that, on the face of it, this measure contravenes EU law.

“They accept this is a measure which does have the effect of restricting imports from other member states. There is no evidence about the degree to which there’s a quantitative restriction on imports from member states.

“Because they have not addressed themselves to that and produced evidence to the court on that point, it is impossible for them to say that the measure is justified as a matter of EU law.”

Mr O’Neill told Lord Eassie, sitting with Lord Menzies and Lord Brodie, that minimum pricing would have a negative impact on the open market and free competition in the EU.

The effect on producers in other member states, which would be forced to raise their prices, had not been considered, he said.

Mr O’Neill added: “One might have expected that the effect that this will have in terms of the internal market and for competition within the market would have been at the forefront of the Scottish Government’s mind when preparing and presenting this policy.

“It clearly doesn’t simply affect the consumer in Scotland. It affects producers in other member states.”

The Scottish Government has said it is committed to introducing the policy to address Scotland’s unhealthy relationship with drink, and save lives.

Mr O’Neill told the court that a minimum unit price for wine, an agricultural product, would be “wholly incompatible” with the principles of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy.

And he said minimum pricing would unfairly impact on “sensible and moderate” drinkers and is unnecessary because evidence shows alcohol consumption is falling anyway.

Mr O’Neill is expected to conclude his opening speech today before lawyers for the Scottish Government make their case.

SEE ALSO

Minimum pricing: Whisky industry’s bid to end deadlock

David Frost: Law on alcohol pricing not necessary

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page