George Kerevan: Sun now setting on the British state

Published on Friday 13 January 2012 00:00

Whether independence is settled by the referendum or not, Westminster’s power is fading

LET’S begin with a scenario that may upset my Nationalist friends. Suppose that in late 2014, the SNP loses the independence referendum and the constitutional status quo prevails. Game, set and match to the Unionists for the next 30 years, you might think.

Well, think again. The reality behind this latest constitutional rammy is the obsolescence of the British state itself, not the political charisma of Alex Salmond. That ramshackle state, designed to run a colonial empire not a modern European democracy, is going to implode anyway, sooner or later. I say implode because none of the big three Unionist parties have any plans to reform the UK constitution. They only react to pressure.

But a lost independence referendum isn’t going to make the SNP disappear. The Nationalists would still have a majority at Holyrood. Meanwhile, on present form, David Cameron will be re-elected with English votes in 2015. In those circumstances, can you see Scottish Labour taking power at Holyrood in 2016? I can’t.

The popular backlash to a lost referendum and a second Cameron victory (involving the eclipse of the Lib Dems) would leave the SNP – not Labour - hegemonic at Holyrood for a generation. That virtually guarantees devo-max, to keep the Nats in their Edinburgh box while stiffing Labour at Westminster. After all, devo-max would be a good excuse to reduce the number of Scots MPs. So much for a lost referendum putting the constitutional question into cold storage. It could even see Alex Salmond remain as First Minister at Holyrood but with full fiscal powers.

Meanwhile, has anyone bothered to look at what’s happening in Northern Ireland during the present truce? Popular sentiment is coalescing around increased devolution (aka devo-max). The Nationalist community sees this as a temporary, halfway house during the economic crisis in the Republic. Pragmatic Unionists see devo-max as the best option given Westminster’s perennial lack of interest in the province. Next stop Northern Ireland becomes (effectively) self-governing then in a generation quietly federates with the Republic. Will Labour, the Lib Dems or even “mainland” Tories care? I think not: when they talk of defending the Union, it never means Northern Ireland.

What of England? How long before the English rebel against the conspiracy by the Westminster oligarchy to deny them a “fair, legal and decisive” referendum on EU membership? Has it not occurred to Cameron that by setting himself up as the supposed champion of a quick, clear testing of Scotland’s views on independence, he is exposing the Tory Party’s long hypocritical stance on Europe, always promising but never delivering – what was the phrase David? – an “never-endum” on the EU.

I mention the European litmus paper because it illustrates how the big Westminster parties have deliberately ignored English domestic political identity since 1945.

They have only gotten away with it because of the split on the right between middle class Ukip and the working class BNP. But win or lose, the Scottish independence referendum – exposed nightly on television – will ignite the fires of English nationalism.

Nothing wrong with that unless the big Westminster parties ignore the need for a separate English Parliament and allow resurgent English nationalism to be captured by the extreme right.

By the way, I note that in recent polls six out of 10 English people aged 16-44 say they are opposed to or agnostic about Scotland staying in the UK. I mention this because support for the United Kingdom is clearly influenced by age, with the generation closest to the Second World War the most committed. Thus demography is undermining the Union surely and steadily.

Why this constitutional myopia among the big three Unionist parties? Labour’s modern ideological roots are more to do with Stalinist central planning than Christian socialism, and you need a centralist state to issue orders. Now the Stalinist boat has foundered, Labour still needs its Celtic fringe MPs to have any hope of getting a majority at Westminster – it won only 28 per cent of the English vote in the 2010 General Election.

I see Labour is now talking about running its own “Save Devolution” campaign. Apart from being transparently irrelevant, can’t they see this will leave them wide open to being asked what plans Labour has to extend devolution? Back to devo-max.

The Lib Dems supposedly favour a UK federal solution but they have never done anything about it, largely because they have never agreed what federalism means. Even this platonic policy stance has been betrayed by Nick Clegg’s desire to sit at the Cabinet table.

In self-defence, expect them to rediscover their federalism – again, we are back to devo-max.

As for the Tories, there is a minimal excuse because constitutional conservatism is their political raison d’être. But the traditional Tory voting base has long since fragmented, white van man dabbling with the populist, English nationalist right and City man with the pro-globalist Blairites. At some stage, the Tories will have to grasp the need to divorce the Celtic fringes or become a minority party in perpetuity. In 2010, the Conservatives won an overall English majority, with 297 seats to Labour’s 191 and the Lib Dem’s 43. Sans the Celtic fringes, Cameron would have had an overall majority of 61 and no need to form a coalition.

My point is that the referendum is only another constitutional way station on the road to the inevitable break-up of the centralist, anti-democratic British state. In 2014, with the re-election of a Tory government imminent at Westminster, and after five years of austerity, my bet is the Scots will take a chance on self-government.

But whether in 2014 or later, what is fated to emerge from the chrysalis is the four UK nations recovering fiscal and domestic sovereignty then re-establishing some sort of loose, con-federal arrangement to manage their common internal market and common security needs. That process could be accelerated if the big three Unionist parties saw sense, instead of protecting their own selfish interests. Sadly, as this week has shown, that is unlikely.

Comments

There are 36 comments to this article

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 3

• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next >
• Show all

36

Vote 'NO'

Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:20 AM

Wise words as ever from Kerewan. The SNP won by a landslide, yet he STILL couldn't get elected!

• Report Unsuitable

35

weegy

Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM

well thought out article, in particular - what if referendum results in scotland staying in uk. i'm sure snp have considered this and come to similar conclusions as george kerevan's

• Report Unsuitable

34

Buggerlugs

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 03:50 PM

In response to a poster earlier about what the residual state, due south, would be called Former United Kingdom Rump

• Report Unsuitable

33

SiônJones

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 03:40 PM

A fine analysis. I agree that by 2014 a YES vote will be more than likely, but even if it is a NO, as you describe, the Tories (who will probably lose their only Scottish seat in 2015) will come to resent the tory assaults from London, which will probably be even more savage than before, spurred on by the confidence that having won the referendum and the GE will give them will soon demonstrate to the Scots that the had made a mistake. Labour under wee Johann Krankie don't stand a chance at the next holyrood elections, so expect Salmond to call another referendum - probably just on devo max - during the next parliament. One that he will win. Whatever the result of the referendum, the increasingly polarised attitude of the Tory PM, who sees himself as the PM for the City of London and nowhere else (as we saw from his petulant tantrum in Brussels) will, apart from fomenting civil unrest, persuade those of us in the Celtic fringes that we will be better off alone. I just hope I live to see it.

• Report Unsuitable

32

samcoldstream

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 03:30 PM

The centralised, 20th Century British State is long Gone With The Wind. The final destination will be a Federal or Con-federal State just short of complete Scottish Independence. Otherwise, goodbye le Royaume-Uni.

• Report Unsuitable

31

flomcjo

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 03:18 PM

Fantastic article, nice one!

• Report Unsuitable

30

Pat, NYC

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 02:52 PM

Great article, says it all really.

• Report Unsuitable

29

Thewildwindblows

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 02:39 PM

The thing about polls is that they completely useless. "Ah that's rubbish" I hear you cry, hear me out. 610 you say? Change one vote and its a dead heat; change two and its a landslide. Polls never reflect the views of those who do not want to be polled. This sounds a rather obvious conclusion but think of the amount of times you decide to walk by people taking surveys and raising for charity in the street. Only those with a strong opinion, aside from those weren't fast enough!, will stop to chip in. My feet carry me away from those people and to the voting booth. That's the only stats that matter. This article while interesting, serves to show nothing new amongst the political landscape, they have always jockeyed for position and wrangle for power. If anything, I'm staggered that its taking this lad this long to notice.

• Report Unsuitable

28

Broon Bairn

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 02:39 PM

27. Hmm. It's quite symptomatic of those in a schizophrenic state (as most unionists are) that they're permanently divided against themselves, and can't seem to settle comfortably into one camp or the other. This perhaps explains all the somersaults they have to perform regularly. This can also lead to trauma (as we see daily on these pages). Their position is abnormal, so we must make allowances for them. Keep taking the tablets, lads.

• Report Unsuitable

27

Buford Van Stomm

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 02:27 PM

Hardeep Sing Kholi has promised to return to scotland if we vote yes.......any chance of a similar promise for uber nats to leave if we vote no?

• Report Unsuitable

26

Cruixer

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 02:01 PM

"Sun now setting on the British state" - now thats the kind of headline I like to see. Very good article, I am surprised the Scotsman printed it - maybe even they are starting to realise that the battle is lost...

• Report Unsuitable

25

Broon Bairn

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 01:30 PM

24. Yes, indeed. I find it very strange that many unionists regard the idea of a sovereign, independent country as somehow weird or abnormal. In fact, that's the NORMAL state of things for most countries round the world. I think, rather, it's the unionist position that's weird and abnormal.

• Report Unsuitable

24

Taigh na Croiche

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 01:04 PM

A good article. The 'UK' has been withering away for years. First the Empire nations declared their independence and sooner or later Scotland will go the same way. For an old nation like Scotland to be ruled from another nation is very strange indeed.

• Report Unsuitable

23

young reekie

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 12:44 PM

An excellent article. Lots to think about. Here's a thought ! If Scotland gets full independence then what does the entity now called The United Kingdom call itself? - England and Wales ?- Where would they sit at the United Nations? Not next to the USA. that's for sure and not on the security council. There's a lot more to this separation than money. England will lose much, much more and Cameron knows this. I hope that the Scottish politicians that negotiate the final settlement are as acutely aware as their English counterparts will be. As we are all aware the English are the consumate politicians.

• Report Unsuitable

22

marquis1

Friday, January 13, 2012 at 12:16 PM

Of course the unionist case is no longer tenable. The answer for the Labour Party in Scotland is simple. Be what your name says : "Scottish Labour". Campaign for Scotland to REGAIN its indepedendance and guess what? You will handsomely win the first Scottish General Election post independence.

• Report Unsuitable

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 3

• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next >
• Show all

Logged in as:

Comment here. Start typing your comment here:

Post comment

Please adhere to our Community guidelines

Your view

Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.