Bullying claims rock Scots schools watchdog

By CHRIS MARSHALL
Published on Tuesday 7 February 2012 12:23

FEARS have been raised about the impact on Scotland’s schools of falling staff morale and allegations of bullying at the body charged with improving the country’s education system.

An internal survey of staff working for schools inspectorate Education Scotland found one in ten said they had been bullied at work within the past year, while just over a third thought the quango was well managed.

Although many employees responded positively about the job they are asked to do, 6 per cent of staff said they wanted to leave “as soon as possible”, and 15 per cent said they hoped to leave within the next year.

Teachers’ leaders described the findings as “hugely concerning” and said uncertainties remained about Education Scotland’s role in both producing curriculum material and carrying out inspections into how they are being taught.

Formed in July last year, the organisation brought together the work of Learning and Teaching Scotland (LTS) and HM Inspectorate of Education (HMIE). It is responsible for improving attainment in the country’s schools.

The body has a budget of more than £30 million a year and is responsible for education from early years through to adult learning.

The staff survey, which was carried out late last year, found fewer than half were proud to work for Education Scotland, with only 22 per cent saying that changes were usually made for the better.

Ann Ballinger, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association, said the survey’s findings raised questions over how the organisation would affect change in the country’s schools.

She said: “This report is hugely concerning.

“One of the biggest issues relating to school inspections is that people often feel they’re being bullied or harassed. If that’s the culture within Education Scotland, it’s hugely worrying for schools.

“I think it’s too early to say whether setting up Education Scotland was a mistake, but theirs is not a job I would like to have.

“There is an absolute need for them to be seen to be scrupulously fair about everything, and that means they might have to be critical of themselves from time to time.”

Dr Bill Maxwell, Education Scotland’s chief executive and a former educational psychologist and head of HMIE, has previously spoken of tackling the problem of Scotland’s “coasting” schools.

However, there remain questions about his own organisation and what many feel is the centralisation of power under its remit.

Larry Flanagan, incoming head of the Educational Institute of Scotland, the country’s largest teaching union, said: “We have had concerns previously about the Education Scotland juggernaut and that it’s being positioned strongly as an arm of government.

“The whole thing happened without any real consultation and there’s some concern that they are in a very powerful position to direct Scottish education – that may be what [education secretary] Mike Russell wants.

“In the past, there was a degree of checks and balances, but in one sense, we now have a situation where they are almost inspecting their own efforts. I think the jury is still out on how effective the body will be.”

As well as inspecting the country’s schools, Education Scotland is charged with helping deliver Curriculum for Excellence, the new programme that was introduced in 2010.

The organisation’s survey was completed by 260 employees – 72 per cent of its workforce. Despite concerns among many about the way the organisation is run, 95 per cent of staff said they found their work interesting, while 84 per cent said it gave them a sense of accomplishment.

But fewer than 40 per cent of respondents thought the body was well managed as a whole, with one in ten reporting they had been bullied and 9 per cent that they had suffered discrimination at work.

Scottish Labour’s education spokesman, Hugh Henry, said: “It’s worrying that so many staff in Education Scotland have such a negative view of their organisation.

“Allegations of bullying need to be taken seriously and Education Scotland needs to realise that it has an influential role in Scottish education and needs to set the best possible standards.

“I do have concerns about such a hybrid organisation, and I’m not sure the combination of the inspectorate and what was previously delivered by LTS will not turn out to be a short-sighted cost-saving measure, which will have a detrimental effect on Scottish education.”

A spokesman for Education Scotland said the staff survey had been carried out at a time when the organisation had only recently been set up.

He said: “We should keep in mind that this survey took place immediately after the amalgamation that set up Education Scotland. This may explain why some individuals have reflected uncertainties in their responses.

“However, action plans are now in place to address these and other issues. There are several aspects of this survey in which Education Scotland has scored well and we continue to work to bring together all aspects of our predecessor bodies.”

A spokesman for the Scottish Government declined to comment, insisting the staff survey was a matter for Education Scotland.

Last week, Education Scotland’s chief executive entered the row over the introduction of Scotland’s new exam system, which is being phased in as part of Curriculum for Excellence.

Dr Maxwell said East Renfrewshire Council’s attempts to delay the introduction of the new exams, which will succeed Standard Grades in Scotland’s schools, risked “undermining” confidence in the new set-up.

The Scottish Qualifications Authority is currently in the process of introducing the new National 4 and National 5 qualifications, which will come into force in 2013-14.

However, teaching unions have called for individual schools to be given the power to postpone their introduction, amid fears that teachers are not ready.

Related Articles

• Analysis: It needs to have the confidence of pupils and parents

  THE importance that Education Scotland has for Scotland’s schools and, by immediate implication, for Scotland’s future cannot be underestimated.

  1 Comments

Comments

There are 56 comments to this article

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 4

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next >
• Show all

56

commentator

Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 02:20 PM

How valid or robust are the findings reported? The article seems to try to sensationalise the negative findings and down played positives and i wonder why it did not report all findings and why did the reporter not contact the various unions representing the staff and management for their comment on the findings of survey and it would have been a more informative article if it had identified how the findings of the survey were corroborated... It is unclear from the article if the reporter didn't bother seeking corroboration of the findings or if the findings were not corroborated. I hope no hasty decisions are made without the findings being explored further to determine their validity.

• Report Unsuitable

55

duelaynomore

Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 07:19 AM

I wonder what offence I caused ..to be moderated?

• Report Unsuitable

54

duelaynomore

Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 07:01 AM

Comment removed by moderator

53

Russell M

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 10:33 PM

The current state of bullying in Scotland can be traced back to the Normans. And has been an integral part of governance ever since. How else could you arrive in a country with a culture dating back to 4,000 years before the Romans attempted their conquest and take over vast tracks of land? Many of which have become the estates of today. What if the ultimate solution to Scotland's long-term prosperity was the return of the land, to the people?

• Report Unsuitable

52

Charles Linskaill

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 07:44 PM

Must have been a glitch in the Scotsman news, all comments on any subject made before 7.30am have been removed.

• Report Unsuitable

51

Tartancult

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 07:03 PM

I see that 4 posts I did not make have been removed...?

• Report Unsuitable

50

Jolly

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 05:23 PM

No 37 A friend of Fernando Poo Alas, the more academically qualified person does not always make the best teacher. I know of PhD graduates who were dreadful teachers. The profession is more complex than you may imagine.

• Report Unsuitable

49

Sawney Has-Been

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 05:23 PM

Are we allowed to post yet? The teacher bashers on her can go jump - the report is not about teachers but about the HMIE and LandT staff. These people are setting up the aims of the CfE and then judging how well they are being implemented. Not a very healthy scenario nor one that inspires confidence.

• Report Unsuitable

48

Tintock Pete

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 04:12 PM

If we sacked everyone who didn't perform 100% all of the time we'd all be unemployed by the end of the day, no arguments ................................Noodle, Ever heard of appraisals? or performance related pay. Your argument suggests it's alright for a plumber to gas the occasional family or a spark to cause the odd hospital blackout....and another thing. Which other service has a closed shop on recruitment? I could be a far better teacher and more qualified and experienced yet only teachers currently employed by councils can apply for "promoted posts".

• Report Unsuitable

47

The Lord

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 04:02 PM

BULLYING WORKS - DAN PARKS RETIRES FROM INTERNATIONAL RUGBY THIS AFTERNOON WATCH THE NEWS THIS EVENING

• Report Unsuitable

46

Simonsaid

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 03:17 PM

#-28- noodle doodle -. If we sacked everyone who didn't perform 100% all of the time we'd all be unemployed by the end of the day, no arguments ================================================= I spent a few years as a Technical Training Instructor and I can assure you that whatever I had to get across to a class was thoroughly understood by me before I attempted to demonstrate it to the class. I valued my reputation too much to do otherwise. The teacher in question should have made sure he knew the answers to all the questions before attempting to write them on the board; it is as simple as that. This was not a case of someone not being 100% this was a case of someone being seen to be incompetent at best or just downright lazy and in his profession totally unacceptable

• Report Unsuitable

45

Tintock Pete

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 02:02 PM

Teacher fury over pothole repair funds?????????? What? No sackings for talking to the press. Unlike Paul the (former) Binman.

• Report Unsuitable

44

Tintock Pete

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 01:59 PM

#42 Noodle. Unfortunately it's hard to comment on individual council staff as they're treated in a different way from teachers whereas teachers enjoy a national agreement set down by Cosla. That binman who refused to trudge through the snow in sub zero temperatures is probably having to re-apply for his job right now whereas teachers who looked out the window and decided the weather was too bad for them to even attempt to go to work are safe in the knowledge that this will never happen to them.

• Report Unsuitable

43

MOCO

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 01:56 PM

This article should have defined the meaning of the word "bullying". Administrators in the public sector are such pampered, sensitive souls that what to them is "bullying" would - in the private sector - be considered a "reasonable instruction or request" from a superior.

• Report Unsuitable

42

noodle doodle

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 01:40 PM

#41 Are these the same binmen that quite clearly didn't trudge through knee deep snow 12 hours a day in sub-zero temperatures in edinburgh last winter? We ended up having to take our rubbish to skips in a supermarker car park.

• Report Unsuitable

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 4

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next >
• Show all

Logged in as:

Comment here. Start typing your comment here:

Post comment

Please adhere to our Community guidelines

Your view

Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.