Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

We Will Rock You - see it in Edinburgh this Christmas

Tax payers to shell out £28.7bn more amid break-up of RBS and Lloyds

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 November 2009
TODAY has proved another seismic day for the UK banking sector as two state-backed lenders unveiled break-up plans which will hit taxpayers for at least another £28.7 billion.
Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group will have to shed more than 900 branches to ease European competition concerns over the vast state support given to them in the past year.

The disposals – which could take up to four years – will put around 10% of the UK retail banking market up for grabs for smaller players or new entrants.

The banks' £39 billion lending commitments to homeowners and businesses remain unchanged while they have had to agree to new rules on staff bonuses to secure the extra billions being pumped in.

Taxpayers have already paid out £37 billion for shares in the two banks since the crisis began although Lloyds paid back more than £2 billion in the summer.

RBS – which will also have to sell its Churchill and Direct Line insurance arm as well as parts of its investment banking business – is putting £282 billion in toxic debts into a taxpayer-backed insurance scheme.

The Government is pumping an extra £25.5 billion into the bank under the plans – with a further £8 billion ready if needed – taking its stake to 84%. RBS will also be able to claim tax write-offs on its losses worth a potential £10 billion.

Lloyds is paying £2.5 billion to avoid the scheme but the Treasury is shelling out £5.7 billion to support a record £13.5 billion rights issue launched by the bank, which will remain 43% state-owned.

The bank has been able to raise the funds due to a "stabilising" UK economy but has 2.8 million private shareholders who will not receive dividends for at least two years.

Chancellor Alistair Darling said the plans would increase competition and represented a "better deal" for the taxpayer.

The taxpayer's potential exposure has been cut by more than £300 billion mainly due to Lloyds pulling out of the Asset Protection Scheme.

But Shadow Chancellor George Osborne said: "There is still no guarantee that today's plan will get credit flowing in the economy."

The pair will not pay discretionary cash bonuses to any staff earning above £39,000 for 2009 – although deferred shared bonuses will still be paid.

Lloyds chief executive Eric Daniels said: "Rewards have to be taken over the same sort of timeline as the period of risk."

But unlike Lloyds, RBS boasts a significant investment banking business where huge payouts have long been the norm.

Chief executive Stephen Hester said the bonus restrictions was "one of the additional obstacles that makes our job of recovering money for the taxpayer more difficult... although I completely understand the rationale for it".

Lloyds will sell at least 600 branches, or about 4.6% of the total market share of UK current accounts, taking its market share to around 25.5%. But it avoided tougher sanctions by pulling out of the APS.

RBS is selling 318 branches of the former Williams & Glyn's outlets in England and Wales and its NatWest branches in Scotland.

These represent 14% of its UK network and will reduce its retail market share by 2%. Its share of the small business banking market will fall by 5%.

Unite warned that up to 25,000 jobs were at risk because of the Government's plan to sell off parts of the banks – and called on ministers to save jobs rather than securing the best price for the banks' assets.

National officer Rob MacGregor said: "We cannot allow a situation to arise where some 25,000 loyal workers in bank branches in high streets and towns across the country are made to pay the price for the banking executives' recklessness.

"Any potential buyers should be assessed on their commitment to job security and protection of terms and conditions, not short-term profits."

Meanwhile the taxpayer is already around £10 billion down on its current stakes in the banks. RBS tumbled 10% today although Lloyds edged higher on news that its bad debt issues were easing.

Hargreaves Lansdown equities analyst Keith Bowman said the sell-offs were potentially good news for UK consumers although "the story of the banks is far from over".

"Suggested disposals have now to find buyers prepared to pay acceptable prices to both shareholders and taxpayers, whilst taxpayers still remain substantial owners of banks – a position inconceivable just a few years ago," he added.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Spoot,

Third rock pool on the left 03/11/2009 13:58:31
#1

Well, I suppose that 20,000 is indeed "more than 20.000". You are almost certainly correct in surmising that this article is another cut and paste job by Scotsman journos; it's a sad fact that many reports and articles in virtually all UK newspapers are lifted verbatim from news agency websites.
2

SkeptikScot,

03/11/2009 15:03:19
No one will miss the loss of the HBOS name, it hasn't got any credibility. RBS isn't much of a name outside Scotland now, I'm surprised the NatWest name will survive.
3

John N Sutherland,

Skelmorlie 03/11/2009 21:19:19
Is there no end to this complete madness? There are good banks and bad banks. The bad ones can go to the wall. Or we will end up putting in more £10,000,000,000's of monies. Count the noughts!? Move your bank account to a safe, good bank, like the Clydesdale and let these oafs go under. After all, nobody helped the steel, coal, computer or shipbuilding industries, so why should Edinburgh bankers get every greedy penny they want.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.