Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Claim a Free Glayva Miniature

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Commission urges BAA to sell off either Edinburgh or Glasgow airport



View Video
Download Video

Video

Paul Charles of Virgin Atlantic discusses the BAA verdict
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 August 2008
ONE of Scotland's two busiest airports could be sold after competition chiefs today recommended that BAA lose control of either Glasgow or Edinburgh airport.
The Competition Commission (CC) said there were competition problems at each of BAA's seven UK airports "with adverse consequences for passengers and airlines".

It recommended that Spanish-owned BAA cease running either Edinburgh or Glasgow airport as well as two of its three London airports – Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted.

The commission said it did not expect to require the sale of either Aberdeen or Southampton airports.

BAA Scotland described the CC's evidence as "flawed and said it was "disappointed" at the findings.

The CC will now consult to see which airports need to be sold.

The commission said there were "significant competition problems" arising from BAA's common ownership of the seven airports.

These included lower levels and quality of service for both airlines and passengers and investment that is not tailored to the requirements of airport users.

Christopher Clarke, chairman of the CC's BAA airports inquiry group, said: "While we accept that constraints on runway capacity in the south east will limit the scope for the benefits of competition in the short-term, we believe that separate owners would be more active than BAA in exploiting existing opportunities.

"In Scotland, where there are no similar capacity constraints, we believe separate owners of Edinburgh and Glasgow would similarly improve their offerings.

He added: "In Scotland, BAA has until recently been noticeably slow to develop new routes at Glasgow and Edinburgh, while at Aberdeen, its investment plans are regarded as unambitious despite relatively high levels of profitability."

The report found that common ownership of Edinburgh and Glasgow airports prevents competition between them.

It found that Aberdeen's strong local monopoly position would not be solved by divestiture so suggested investigating what other measures might be appropriate, such as more regulation.

BAA Scotland said it believed BAA's stewardship of Aberdeen, Edinburgh and Glasgow airports had served Scotland well.

Gordon Dewar of BAA Scotland said, "We remain of the view that Glasgow and Edinburgh airports serve separate markets and that competition between the two is highly unlikely, regardless of ownership.

"This is a view shared by many of Scotland's leading business organisations and is based on detailed and robust evidence.

"We are also surprised by the suggestion that a greater level of regulation may be required at Aberdeen Airport, recently named the world's most improved airport, but the Commission does not suggest this change for any other airport."

He said the CC's recommendations could have "serious implications" for a number of other Scottish airports.

Labour transport spokesman Des McNulty said: "If Glasgow or Edinburgh Airport is to be sold by BAA, any potential buyer must show a strong commitment to continued investment.

"It is essential that we safeguard jobs and protect the interests of passengers."

"We all have an interest in continued growth at both airports because the success of Scottish economy depends on strong transport links to the rest of the UK and Europe.

"This is particularly important as we prepare to welcome visitors from all over the world for the Commonwealth Games in 2014."

Ron Hewitt, chief executive of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said he was dismayed at the report.

He said: "As far as I can see the Competition Commission have completely misread the situation in Scotland, which is a distinct market from England.

"Glasgow and Edinburgh airports really serve separate markets and all the research bears this out.

"The concern of business is that the proposals in the preliminary findings completely pull the rug out from under the feet of some of our most important assets for international trade.

"BAA's investment of over £500 million, £40 million in Edinburgh alone this year, cannot be guaranteed from an enforced sale."

He also said he could not understand why the commission have suggested that there could be a need for greater regulation at Aberdeen.

He added: "My dismay at this report leaves me with one singular conjecture – the Competition Commission cannot have even read the business community's evidence, which was universally in favour of supporting BAA's dedication to improved air services for Scotland and their fantastic financial commitment to making that happen."

He said the Chamber of Commerce would "fight this unwarranted interference tooth and nail."

The full article contains 728 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 August 2008 11:41 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's airports
 
1

Andrew,

20/08/2008 12:06:39
BOTH could have had a rail link but only GLASGOW is the winner now!!
2

notantidollarbut,

prestonlinks 20/08/2008 12:23:13
nationalise the lot and take them out the hands of these capitalist fat cats
3

Brad,

Glasgow 20/08/2008 12:24:19
Ron Hewitt should be ashamed of himself
4

,

20/08/2008 12:45:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

lisa,

perth 20/08/2008 13:33:41
It is not true to say that the market is different. I have to go to Glasgow for transatlantic flights whereas a separate owner for Edinburgh would encourage this traffic from Edinburgh. Glasgow is one roadworks too many from home. It is dingy and has almost no facilities for kids. Who needs three WH Smiths when there is no McDonalds?
6

All Politicians are the same,

Scotland 20/08/2008 13:48:27
#5

Lisa, there is a Burger King but you can fly daily from Edinburgh to Newark on continental and JFK on delta.
7

notantidollarbut,

prestonlinks 20/08/2008 13:51:18
somewhere thats McDonalds free WOW
8

Brad,

Glasgow 20/08/2008 14:19:49
It's not just whether they serve different markets (which they mostly do because wht would BAA want one to comepete with the other?) but also the deliberate funnelling of flights to LDN (where BAA get an additional set of landing fees, retail spend) than encouraging direct connections to overseas destinations.

BAA's performance at adding such flights was woeful until the Government bunged Route Development Fund money at them (which ultimately just encourages them to try even less hard).
9

Stephen Cowley,

Edinburgh 20/08/2008 14:43:30
This is back to the old days of Scotsman journalism. You read it and ask yourself: what do the Scottish Government think? But no-one thought it was worth asking them. Instead we have the opposition transport spokesman and an oddly anti-competitive chap from the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, who is not seriously interrogated.

It's a shame the Scottish government is not put on the spot - it would be interesting to hear Alex Salmond's economic analysis, particularly as he is an economist.

Hopefully more sill be made of the story in the coming days - it should run and run.
10

IanW,

Otto 20/08/2008 16:04:11
If I am not mistaken BAA is owned by a Spanish company. Does the British Competition organisation have any rights to order/enforce any sale??

11

Stephen Cowley,

Edinburgh 20/08/2008 16:40:07
#10
Yes, they have been owned by Spanish company Ferrovial since 2006, which has a majority interest. I believe the CC does not have the right to enforce sale, but the British Government does.

There are several potential buyers:
"Potential buyers of some of the BAA airports include Manchester Airport Group, the largest UK-owned airport operator, and Global Infrastructure Partners, a joint venture of Credit Suisse and GE." (from FT)
12

Brad,

Glasgow 20/08/2008 17:33:01
#9, I don't think the Scottish Government has expressed a view - as with Westminster it was awaiting the CC report.

I'm sure there are pretty strong views in private though!
13

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 20/08/2008 20:21:41
Of course the BAA say that GLA & EDI serve separate markets because the BAA have ENGINEERED such a policy & that it serves BAA's purpose for them to do so.

The BAA have not served Scotland at all well...& they know that full well too.
14

Robbierunciman,

Romney Marsh 20/08/2008 23:32:17
the question is, is the central belt better served by two competing airports offering similar routes or by two airports offering a complimentary service?

I believe the latter to be the case. They should be 'Scotland international (east)' and 'scotland international (west)'.

The short distance between the two means that the current situation where a flight leaves london or Bham for edinburgh, swiftly followed by one for Glasgow is silly.

It is claimed that the airports serve seperate markets. If this was the case and they were linked by a high speed rail line - to allow rapid transfer of passengers and luggage, it would not matter if they were owned by the same company and flights could be rationalized.

This is the tragedy and lost opportunity of the SNP controlled Scottish Executive's decision not to develop the rail hub at Edinburgh - poor governance and strategic thinking.

I suspect that the Government will take months to make its mind up and it will be done gradually. The real fun will be over runways in the SE.
15

truthsleuth,

21/08/2008 00:27:31
There is simply not the need for two airports so close together and only one would have existed if aviation did not receive enormous subsidies from the taxpayer and ratepayer.
Remove duty fre a compltely unjustifiable subsidy to both customer retailer and airport and landing charges would have to go up.
If airlines had to compete for slots as they should since they belong to the nation and not to BAA then landing charges would have to go up.
If aviation were made to pay tax on its fuel as every other industry, the motorist and us have to then fares would have to go up.
If aviation were made to joint the emmisioons trading scheme as energy suppliers have had to do and pay for the trading certificates (as the energy suppliers should have to do) then fares would have to go up.
If the airlines were madfe to give adequate leg room to their economy passengers then air travel would be bearable and could even become a pleasure if an expensive one.
Now none of these cost increases would put aviation out of business but it would lead to a reduction in short haul flights and the efficient use of aviation for long distance overseas traffic.
It would certainly stop Scottish MPs flying backwards and forwards to London. Perhaps stop the English Businessmen buying Castles in Scotland and mr Trump building a golf couse in Aberdeen.
More of us common people would take holidays at home and reduce the tourism drain on the national budgets.

16

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 12/10/2008 08:30:37
For Edinburgh To have more Transatlantic Flights it would need a bigger runway to accomodate the new Jumbo Jets and thats not likely to happen as the Scottish Parliament is againg Expansion at Edinburgh

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.