Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Vendetta' sparks expenses probe

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2009
A CONSERVATIVE peer alleged yesterday that a police investigation into his expenses claims of almost £100,000 for overnight stays in London had been sparked by a political vendetta.
Lord Hanningfield accused a rival party's MP – believed to be Bob Russell, the Liberal Democrat MP for Colchester – of attempting to smear him by lodging a complaint with the police.

Records show that Lord Hanningfield, a Tory transport spokesman
and the leader of Essex County Council, claimed nearly £100,000 in overnight allowances between 2001 and 2008 despite living less than 40 miles from Westminster.

Rules state that peers whose main home is outside the capital can claim £174 a night if their stay is "for the purpose of attending sittings of the House". Receipts are not required.

In a statement, Lord Hanningfield said: "A Liberal Democrat MP has made a complaint about my expenses to the police.

"This MP has been determined to blacken my name with personal attacks in the press and in parliament for actions that I have taken in trying to improve the quality of education in Essex.

"The House of Lords authorities have no complaint in relation to my expenses and I am satisfied I can account for them."

Mr Russell said he took this as a reference to himself. He refused to confirm whether he had made a complaint to police about the peer, but said: "I have drawn to the attention of various authorities matters which I think are of concern which need looking at."

On accusations he was attempting to smear the peer, he said: "He's entitled to say what he wants. My job is to unearth the facts as I understand them and present them to the appropriate bodies to look at."

Scotland Yard announced last month that it was looking into alleged abuse of the parliamentary expense system by a "small number" of MPs and peers but refused to discuss names or political affiliations.

But it is understood inquiries are also under way into Labour MPs Elliot Morley and David Chaytor, as well as Labour peers Lord Clarke of Hampstead and Baroness Uddin.

The move places further pressure on Tory leader David Cameron, who has pledged to ensure his party complies with rules on transparency and that all claims pass the "smell test".

Polls have suggested that the Tories have fared worse than Labour as a result of the parliamentary expenses scandal.





The full article contains 405 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2009 9:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Herman The German,

04/07/2009 02:52:38
No Hanningfield it is not a vendetta,you have been caught bang to rights with your fingers in the (to use the Essex vernacular) Jack and Jill.
2

donald,

glasgow 04/07/2009 05:08:56
How many criminals can claim exemption because they were only grassed up because of a vendetta?
3

pitpony,

musselburgh 04/07/2009 07:22:55
this is the way to go nothing like abit of back stabbing.keeps the ding bats on their toes.[not saying people go and stab mp,s lord,s]not until i get tickets printed,or get lottery sorted.only 1,700 allowed tickets priced at £17$$$$!
4

mr broon,

Edinburgh 04/07/2009 10:14:09
According to the Daily Telegraph the fallout from the
MPs parliamentary expenses scandal will result in reformation of the Lords?

However, one freelance journalist has suggested that the Telegraph has also obtained full details of every Peers' expenses and, if the system in the Lords is not sorted out, full details of every Peer will be published?

5

Willie Mor,

04/07/2009 10:21:17
A political vendetta, surely there must be some mistake.

Are you saying that this is the reverse of the situation where those who deserve to get done don't,whilst those who don't deserve to get done do.

Seems that you are, and one can only suspect that you are as pure as the driven snow,and always have been.

And why would someone have a vendetta against you. Diddums.
6

JCA REID,

Annan 04/07/2009 11:37:07
The only vendetta is rooting out these "expense" claims.....MP's of ALL persuasions have been deliberately & cynically ripping off the public: £2000 for plasma TVscreens, "flipping" 2nd. homes, £400 food bills, £250 a week for "petty cash & sundries", £20corkscrews etc. etc. It is long overdue to call this what it is......fraud & theft. time to hound the entire lot....only the "whiter than white", to survive, into a gulag & they can work it off!!
7

Sgian Achlais,

04/07/2009 13:18:14
Surely a quick call to the hotels concerned would provide the information for the Noble Lord to refute such claims.

If he stayed they will have records of his stay. His Diary will record where and when and about 1 hour would produce the information.


Unless.....He is another lying scum bag milking the taxpayer while he lives the life of luxury. £174 per night is Dinner, Bed and Breakfast.

Is this on top of his £300 daily expenses.

Off with their .....
8

Joe Macdelta.,

04/07/2009 16:58:09
40 miles is not such along commute, you should be able to travel that on a daily basis, no need for overnight allowances in your case, get your act sorted.
9

langtonian,

uphall 05/07/2009 18:05:39
LORD HANGINGFIELD IS WELL NAMED.

He protesteth too much.

Suspect he is for the "long drop"



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.