Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Eight patients die in outbreak of superbug at hospital



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 June 2008
THE deaths of eight patients at a hospital from the Clostridium difficile "superbug" in the past six months have triggered calls for a re-examination into hospital procedures.
The Vale of Leven Hospital, in Alexandria, West Dunbartonshire, had to treat 54 patients with the C diff bug during December to June this year, 41 of whom contracted the infection following admission.

The eight who died were all elderly patients and yesterday NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health was criticised for failing to properly tackle the virus.

Releasing a report into the outbreak, the health board said that in eight cases, C diff was believed to be the main cause of death.

However, in another eight deaths, the bug was found to have been a contributory factor, while a further six patients with the infection also died, though the board said C diff played no role in these cases.

The outbreak was uncovered following the discovery of three cases of the 027 strain in the Clyde area, which raised fears that it may have been spread from Vale of Leven to the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley.

The subsequent investigation revealed "that a high number of elderly patients died" – particularly those who had been prescribed antibiotics – at the Vale of Leven during the first part of this year.

There are currently only three patients in the hospital with the bug and all are being treated in isolation, the board added.

The board's public health protection unit yesterday held an outbreak control meeting to discuss its response to the deaths. It agreed a series of measures including a review of the use of antibiotics.

Dr Syed Ahmed, chairman of the outbreak control team, said: "The overall number of C diff cases within the six-month period is higher on average than we would expect and we are particularly concerned about the number of deaths due to this infection."

Professor John Coia, a consultant microbiologist and director of the National C diff Reference Service, said a reduction in the use of antibiotics had to be re- examined.

And Professor Hugh Pennington, emeritus professor of bacteriology at the University of Aberdeen, said the outbreak would change the way people dealt with C diff.

He said: "Unfortunately, we always seem to need some sort of event like this just to get it up on to the screen. It's been there, people have been working very hard on tackling C diff, but it still requires politicians, hospital managers and workers to say, 'Whatever else, if somebody comes into a hospital they should go out no worse than they came in'."

The Lib Dem health spokesman, Ross Finnie, criticised the health board, claiming it was failing to manage the problem properly.

"They found that eight patients had died from C diff," Mr Finnie said. "That doesn't sound like better detection, but rather a complete failure of the health board to stay on top of virus control."

Margaret Watt, chairwoman of the Scotland Patients Association, said the outbreak showed people's fears about going into hospital were well grounded.

Q&A: Old age and antibiotics raise risk factor

What is Clostridium difficile?


It is a bacterium that causes diarrhoea as well as more serious intestinal infections.

Who is most at risk?

People who require prolonged use of antibiotics, and the elderly.

Why are the elderly worst affected?

Children are born with the bug but are unaffected, and it decreases with age. In old age the bug returns, this time with potentially lethal results.

How does it compare with other so-called 'superbugs'?

There were 1,652 deaths in the UK from MRSA in 2006, and 6,480 killed by C difficile, a rise of 72 per cent over 2005.

What is the Scottish Government doing?

At the beginning of the month, Nicola Sturgeon, the health secretary, announced all patients are to be tested for MRSA on admission and treated if necessary. A hand-hygiene campaign and reporting system has been established.

How long have we known about C difficile?

Though it has been known for a long time, it was first identified as a hospital problem during the 1960s, but only became a major issue in the 1970s, when antibiotic use became much more widespread.

Is it possible that C difficile can be eradicated completely.

No, unlike MRSA, which is a hospital-bound condition, its spores exist in the environment naturally. However, it is possible to minimise its effects.

The full article contains 749 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 June 2008 9:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Hospital superbugs
 
1

Good Answer,

Glasgow 12/06/2008 00:29:16
Must be another legacy from Scottish labour
2

subrosa,

12/06/2008 03:00:19
Picked up this bug in hospital 16 months ago and left with long term problems. Was a fit person for my age when I went in for a small procedure. Please wash your hands in hot soapy water before going in and coming out of hospitals.
3

W Smith,

Middle East 12/06/2008 04:06:48
How bad does it have to get before anyone gets sacked?

Of course, its the Public Sector, where nobody gets sacked.

BTW
1) After touching dead bodies or carcasses the jewish priests were obliged, by scripture, to wash their hands.

It was thousands of years later before western medicine understood this practice.

Unfortunately, in Scotland, some minging STAFF still don't get it.

By mentioning patients Nicoals Sturgeon is, in my opinion, diverting the real problem which is 'dodgy' hygiene amongst the staff - not to mention the filthy wards.

2) How many other deaths due to superbugs have been put down to 'pneumonia' which often is a result of the superbugs?

3) If people had been getting this superbug from McDonalds counters you could just imagine the fuss and the criticism aimed at the McNeocons.
4

bring them on,

12/06/2008 05:56:49
I think most of the punters who eat at McDonalds are immune to most things.
5

Guga II,

Rockall 12/06/2008 06:05:10
#3. Your comment on Nicola Sturgeon is spot on. This is just like her proposal to test patients for MRSA when they come into hospital, but no mention of testing hospital staff.

Not only are many hospitals filthy, but the numbers of staff, particularly doctors, that don't wash their hands between patients, is horrendous.

It seems to me that as well as testing patients for MRSA when they come into hospital, they should also be testing all staff members and, while they are at it, there should be regular testing of patients and staff for C. Diff.

Incidentally, I too wonder about the number of deaths, particularly among the elderly, that have been put down to pneumonia when the cause has actually been due to one of these superbugs.

6

!Ya basta!,

12/06/2008 06:51:28
For once I find myself agreeing with W Smith. With all the deaths and subsequent attention on this issue and the related MRSA it is TOTALLY unacceptable that basic hygiene proecdures and the equally important, good housekeeping practices of keeping wards etc. clean are STILL not in place. The origin of this problem is well known, when the Tories started sub-contratcing everything to cut expenditure. Labour have excaerbated it by continuing down the same track.

Hospital Directors must either reinstate permanent cleaning staff or pay enough money to contractors to do the job properly and then to supervise that properly. Unfortunately the poor cleaners are sandwiched in the middle and usually not given enough time to do the job properly. But ultimately the Hospital management has to take responsibility for this.

Regarding hygienci practices for professional staff, I have worked in pharmaceutical clean rooms where hygiene and sterility is of course vital. Hospitals, especially Operating Theatres STILL often have poor hygienic technique and could learn a lot from the pharms industry here. The knowledge is already there it just needs to be applied.

If they can't keep a hospital clean what hope is there? It really is an embarassment and a tragedy. People should be sacked and there seems to be a case for negligence too.
7

Red Dykes,

Highland 12/06/2008 09:17:34
Direct legacy of removing cleaning from direct NHS control and allowing "contractors" in - standards fell, corners cut, staff cut, poor management, no accountability and profit coming before practice - Until the NHS has PROPER accountability, inspection systems and regulation - these calamities will go on - costing lives.
8

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 12/06/2008 09:34:56
"NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health was criticised for failing to properly tackle the virus. "

Comforting to know that this Scotsman 'medical correspondent' doesn't know the difference between a BACTERIUM and a VIRUS!

A virus is a 'non-living' particle - and it is MILLIONS of times smaller than a bacterium - a single celled organism.

Does it matter? Yes it does - especially if you are getting PAID to write this stuff!
9

danbob,

12/06/2008 09:35:02
Must be a record. We have got to seven posts without somebody blaming England.
10

Iain D,

Tunbridge Wells 12/06/2008 10:05:17
Having spent a lot of time having treatment in very risky Hospitals (Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells) that make Vale of Leven look a paragon of virtue, I think I can speak from a position of strength. Privatising is not the cause of the reduced standards. The firms adhered to the standards set them by the Health Trusts (Public bodies) who did not want to spend the money on cleaners. The Nurses and Doctors are not privatised and they are the ones who display the most appalling ignorance of basic hygiene. I have seen forgetfulness/refusal to use hand wash bottles. Neglect of changing dressings/bedding. I had to approach the ward sister to ask how often my dressing should be changed to be told daily, I told her it had been in place three days. When a PIC line was inserted into my arm the blood on the floor was not cleaned up for two days, the bedding was changed the following day.
Most Nurses are under a lot of strain there appears to money pouring into middle tier managers who contribute absolutely nothing to the medical services but create and check the forms that the Medical staff have to complete to ensure that Government targets are met and keep money flowing.
11

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 12/06/2008 10:46:26
It looks like a plate of chips.
12

ACM,

Bearsden 12/06/2008 11:39:39
What about nurses etc wandering about outside hospitals in their uniforms. The uniforms must be full of germs from their work or they may pick up infection outside hospitals and carry it in to patients.

There is a growing tendency for hospital workers to shop in supermarkets in full uniform. Applies equally to care home/nursing home staff.
13

Sylvia in Regina,

Canada 12/06/2008 12:10:40
#12 ACM.. Spot on!!! I can remember (in the 1960's) when nurses came to work in their street clothes and shoes, and had a locker where they kept their "Hospital" uniform and shoes and changed before going on duty. Now they come to work dressed as they are to work - bringing 'God knows what' into the hospital and into the wards. Our nurses no longer wear their caps anymore, and I think they should. They graduate with their hats and then leave them off!!
#10 Iain... Neglect is the only thing you can count on in hospital. They used to wash floors morning and afternoons and during any 'accidents' that may have happened in the wards. Now, as you said, there could be 'heaven knows what' on the floor for days and no one seems to notice. I guess they cut out the cleaning personnel as well. Any way to save money, I guess - but this leads to disaster later!!!
14

David Ban,

04620 Vera 12/06/2008 13:49:51
My wife who was trained as a Nurse in New Zealand tells me of the strict cross infection control which used to exist in the NZ hospitals over forty years ago under the supervision of Matrons who were sticklers for sterilisation procedures in procedures and staff attitudes.

She despairs of what she sees happening in hospitals. Put it bluntly bugs are not politically correct and do not give in to the whims of relative morality. They are lethal and opportunistic and will take full advantage of politicians who believe the credo of "human rights"
and staff who put ignorance and lack of discipline before the lives of the patients.

What are the longitudinal studies of infection incidence on Nurses who do not wear hats and wear their uniforms outside the hospital. In my wife's day they had a uniform to wear outside and the duty uniform NEVER went outside the wards and was changed on a daily basis.

The credo of Marxist socialism has crept in where "targets" are all and the "rights" of staff take precedence over the medial care of the patient and professional knowledge.
15

alexandermc,

san francisco 12/06/2008 23:19:41
Very interesting discussion. I am not really sure Scotland has such a high rate of infections. In the USA we do not have central reporting of C. diff. I work in private practice and see many patients getting this problem. It is actually the result of using antibiotics, we have these bacteria in our intestines, we get overgrowth when certain antibiotics are used. I am very impressed with the reporting system in the UK. We do not have this in the USA and probably would not like to hear the findings. Do not be too hard on the NHS, they simply report what the rest of us do not!!!!
16

"Scotty",

12/06/2008 23:51:57
I have a very dear friend whose husband got MRSA while in a hospital in Kent. He almost died; his quality of life has suffered, a lot. I know hospitals are the worst place for people to get infections but if they were properly cleaned AND the staff washed their hands between patients, perhaps patients such as my friend would not have ill-health continuing today.
17

scotsdoc,

NANAIMO BC CANADA 12/06/2008 23:57:23
I'd fire the Hospital Administrator.

He is paid to see the rules are followed!

Somebody is ignoring the RULE BOOK if there is cross infection in a hospital.

Let him inspect a random area of his hospital daily, with the Union representatives, Matron etc. and take a polaroid camera....AND IF A DEFICIENCY IS FOUND HE TAKES 2 PHOTOS and gives one to the STAFF representative responsible, with orders to FIX it or be FIRED!!(One photo for the record because the UNION or whatever will swear blue bloody murder that the deficiency NEVER OCCURRED!).....Behind the toilets...under the kitchen friges....in all the locked broom closets....Let him watch the hygiene of the foodhandlers SURE THEY WEAR GLOVES.......AS IF THE GLOVES WERE TO PROTECT THEM AND NOT THE PATIENTS!........DO THEY EVER CHANGE THE GLOVES IF THEY TOUCH SOMETHING UNSTERILE?.......I think you'll find they NEVER do.......because they don't understand the CONCEPT of sterility......CAN THEY UNDERSTAND THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE EVEN?

I'd also say get all patients in hospital OFF TAGAMET TYPE DRUGS if possible.....ISOLATE PATIENTS ON TAGAMET TYPE DRUGS as they are the carriers because with no stomach acid the germs pass into and live in the colon.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.