Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 11th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Three visions of a new White House



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 April 2008
TUESDAY is D-Day for the ever more brutal primary battle between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as the last major state, Pennsylvania, goes to the polls.
A big win for Clinton will give her the hope of salvaging a campaign in which she has been browbeaten by the phenomenal support of her younger rival. Anything less is likely to confirm Obama as the nominee Democrats pick to face Republican John McCain in the November election.

But while the result lies in the balance, months of campaigning have given a clearer view of how the world might change with a Clinton, Obama or McCain White House.

Here, Scotland on Sunday looks at how each of the three could win the presidency and what they would do once installed in the Oval Office.

How Obama would become the next US president

Barack Obama has already announced what may amount to the 'end game' of his campaign, declaring himself in favour of ending his marathon of TV debates with Clinton.

It comes with a recognition among his staff that, if he can avoid verbal gaffes, such as a speech when he labelled small-town Americans "bitter", he is coasting to victory.

Polls say he will lose by single figures to Clinton in Pennsylvania on Tuesday but make up the ground with victories in Indiana and North Carolina on May 6.

His task from now on is simply to avoid making statements that dent his national polling lead of around 9%.

With Clinton unable to catch his lead of between 130 and 160 delegates, his path to victory would lie in the 350 uncommitted party-appointed superdelegates, including heavyweights Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and Ted Kennedy, conferring in June, as suggested by Senate majority leader Harry Reid, to anoint a winner.

By then Obama will have 1,900 primary delegates. Another 150 plus of the uncommitted 'supers' will take him past the 2,025 he needs for the nomination.

Many of these votes could come from Clinton supporters who conclude that it would be political suicide for the party top-brass to nominate Clinton if the voters have gone for Obama.

The nomination itself will not come until the August convention, but under this scenario, Clinton, sensing humiliation if she stays in the race, will bow out.

What he would do…

Obama would then see a surge in support with rock festival-style summer rallies, beating McCain in November by hammering him on the twin ills of a deteriorating economy and the Iraq war.

Obama has offered a new engagement with the United Nations and with allies, leading some to hope for a rebirth of the Special Relationship that will relieve Britain of its high-wire act of choosing between pleasing Washington and pleasing Europe.

Obama has drawn praise and criticism in equal measure by declaring he is willing to talk to world leaders, even those of America's adversaries Cuba and Iran, in order to promote peace. His supporters say this will ease global anti-American sentiment kindled by the invasion of Iraq – a war Obama opposed. Others say such meetings risk handing propaganda triumphs to the world's tyrants.

There are expectations of a new commitment to human rights, including hopes that under Obama the US will join the International Criminal Court.

But Obama's new engagement with the world will also contrast with a more protectionist trade policy. He has promised to give tax breaks to US manufacturers and renegotiate the North American Free Trade treaty, leading to fears of new trade barriers.

How Clinton would make it to the Oval Office

Hillary Clinton's path to success in this primary election depends on her reported ace in the deck – strong support among party officials.

These party officials, who comprise the superdelegates, will be nervous of making her the nominee if Obama wins the popular vote. But if she can even the score of elected delegates, they might change their minds.

To this end she will hope for Obama to make some gaffe, or be hit by a personal revelation that sees voters flock to his rival.

Alternatively, she could hope to reinstate the delegates of the Florida and Michigan primaries, who are suspended after both states moved forward the dates of their primaries without permission.

If Clinton can get a majority on the Credentials Committee at the Denver Convention, that committee could reinstate these delegations, allowing Clinton to close the voter gap.

It looks to be a tall order. Obama was not a candidate in Michigan, and would argue that reinstating their delegates is wrong and possibly illegal.

A bumpier strategy would be for Clinton to demand the nomination as the price for ending an ever more damaging race. Many party top brass fear that if this battle drags on into summer, the Republicans will benefit.

One possibility suggested by Clinton and husband Bill is for Obama to agree to be her vice-president, although he has ruled out such a move.

If Clinton gets the nomination, the path to victory against McCain would follow similar lines to Obama's, hammering McCain on the twin failures of the Bush administration, the war and the economy.

What she would do…

From the outside, a Clinton White House might look much like an Obama one. Both senators have promised new engagement with the world, even as they call for an end to free trade that has seen millions of American jobs exported, principally to China.

Clinton's foreign policy approach appears more cautious than Obama's, and she has castigated him for offering to talk too readily with America's enemies. "We have a choice in who we associate with," she remarked in last week's presidential debate.

Like Obama, Clinton has promised to end the Bush administration's virtual blackout of the United Nations. Clinton can also draw on experienced foreign policy officials, many of whom served in the presidency of her husband, Bill.

Like Obama, she promises early withdrawal from Iraq, a move that would allow Britain to pull out troops it badly needs to deploy elsewhere.

But, as with Obama, Clinton's new international engagement comes with a caveat for Britain: Gordon Brown will have to compete for favours with France, Germany, India and Japan, all eager to be seen as the partner of a new, more open, US administration.

How McCain would defeat the Democrats for the top job

McCain's strong suit in the presidential race is the potentially self-destructive battle between Clinton and Obama. The nastier their spat becomes, the more the crucial swing-voters may decide he is the man best trusted with the nuclear briefcase.

And even after the Democrat battle is over, if his presidential rival is Clinton, he will remind voters of her false claims to have braved sniper fire in Bosnia and cemented peace in Northern Ireland during that contest. He will also highlight the millions of dollars her husband has garnered from foreign benefactors, suggesting that these donors will expect big favours once she is in office.

Against Obama, McCain will highlight his association with controversial black pastor Jeremiah Wright, and his apparently condescending characterisation of "bitter" small-town Americans.

And though he has been commendable in opposing such sentiment, he may draw support from millions of voters who do not want to see either an African American or a woman as president.

On the positive side, McCain will win support for his disarming charm, and his status as a genuine war hero, having suffered years of torture as a prisoner of North Vietnam. But perhaps his biggest advantage will be that he was not a member of the Bush administration. While supporting many of its policies, notably the invasion of Iraq, McCain can portray himself as standing for the ideals of Republicans, but not those of the Bush administration.

Finally, McCain's record of working with Democrats, notably fellow senator Joe Lieberman, is in line with popular sentiment which seeks a consensus candidate to end partisan divisions.

What he would do…

Like his Democratic Party adversaries, McCain has promised a new outreach to friends and allies in the world. Yet it is unclear how big a break he will make from Bush, with his advisers split between multilateralists and the Neo Cons.

The Republican senator has appeared to retreat on promises to close Guantanamo Bay, and it is unclear how much he would trust the United Nations to solve the world's problems.

Among commitments that have alarmed Western allies, he has declared that if he were president, he would boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics in protest at violence in Tibet. And the senator wants Russia kicked out of the G8 group of industrial nations, accusing Moscow of a lack of cooperation.

Meanwhile, McCain's call for US troops to stay in Iraq for "100 years" will send shudders down the spine of Whitehall, which knows that this war remains a stumbling block to better relations with Europe.

The full article contains 1496 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Angus Ogg,

19/04/2008 20:30:34
I hate to say this, as I think America is a fantastic country.

However, President George W. Bush hasn't exactly been in the "Top Ten" of all USA presidents.

If the USA end up with a repeat of President George Dubya, that isn't exactly a hit domestically nor internationally, and the US economy keeps going south to near Depression, is there not a danger that the whole nation will end up declining in a way that saw the practical end of the British Empire last century ?

Perhaps it is just a case of the natural Rise & Fall of Empires.

The British Empire ended, and now it may sadly be the turn of the American Republic to decline.

What's next ?
2

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 20/04/2008 02:21:20
"Et tu Brute"
3

Stuart 2,

Pennsylvania Wilds 20/04/2008 03:07:04
Good story but those so called gaffes are really Obama speaking what he really believes. I live outside of a small village and his association with the Rev. Wright, a known terrorist and putting the small town people down really did him great harm.

However, Pennsylvania being the democracy is he can still win. If he has a big win in Philly then he could carry the state. Almost all of the super deligates from Pa. are from the Philly area.

To most of us it dosen't matter which one wins. If either one wins the general election then it will be socialism, more judges rewriting the Constitution, higher taxes and more federal power and less freedom for the citizens.
4

iuris dea ,

20/04/2008 03:07:53
The Scotsman 'reporter' Chris Stephen has ignored the latest poll that shows the Monster is now ahead of the Messiah in nationally. She's leading in Pennsylvania also.

The polling data also shows Obama has already LOST the general election because he cannot win Florida and Michigan. Without Florida and Michigan, a candidate cannot win the general election.

So Mr. Stephen, you need to get up to speed if you plan to be a real reporter. Start with getting the truth about the Straight Talker- he's going to be President Straight Talker January 21, 2009.

Here's more news the Scotsman staff got wrong: McCain was NOT the first person to say that the U.S. will be in Iraq 100 years.
Gen. Merrill McPeak is Obama's leading military adviser and his campaign co-chairman; it is McPeak who first made the statement that the US will be in Iraq 100 years.
5

iuris dea ,

20/04/2008 03:13:54
@3
" To most of us it dosen't matter which one wins."

I'm assuming you did not mean that statement the way it sounds. ??

Americans do care who wins. That a percentage of the politicians want to move to a socialist nanny state, and appoint liberal judges, that may be true.
6

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 20/04/2008 06:12:06
American international reputation is in TATTERS. You need to have real CHANGE and there will be no greater message than a BLACK Democrat who is willing to speak as opposed attack.
7

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 06:24:59
Stuart 2,
Pennsylvania Wilds
___________________________

U wrote :
"If either one wins the general election then it will be socialism, more judges rewriting the Constitution, higher taxes and more federal power and less freedom for the citizens."

Dude here are the financial facts,

In 2000 when Bill Clinton left Office our national debt was shrinking and stood at $3 trillion.

In 2009 when Bush leaves office our national debt will be expanding and now stands at $ 9 trillion.

If McCain wins who is a clone of Bush, then expect a similar financial disaster to repeat on the American people.

Should that happen, then the crash of 1929/1930 will look like a storm in a tea cup, compared to the financial cataclysm, caused by the Republican Pres. led White House .

IF he stayed 8 years, our national debt will rocket to $27 trillion, based on the ratio 3:1 from 2000 to 2009 figures.

GC
8

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 20/04/2008 06:31:54
#6..
Except Obama has no plan..no real plan. When he can't see a teleprompter, and questioned..he is all over the place..never giving an answer to the question.
Doubling capital gains taxes!!..pulling troops out immediately, then leaving some there..he has said nothing concrete...but no one seems to hear it, the media seems to care less.
They keep pushing this guy..Soros has a lot of money to make sure he gets in.
To must of us it DOES matter who wins.
9

Toast,

20/04/2008 10:36:04
It would be nice if just one of the candidates were to address the current depression and offer some ideas as to how they would influence the subprime,banking,food crisis affecting the world.And as they all support the ethenal fuel policy obviously all three are idiots.
10

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 20/04/2008 14:34:08
I agree with Stuart 2 in #3 when he says that it doesn't really matter which of the 3 wins.

clinton & McCain are both tainted by their track records, that is true. Obama is the man who tries to inspire hope that he will change things. But his web site says he wants to attack neighboring countries from the US military bases in Iraq.

Yesterday was the 15 year anniversary of the day that our government attacked and killed a bunch of people hiding in a church at Waco, Texas. who of the 3 candidates will seek justice in this case? And if none of them will seek justice in this case, then why should any of us vote for any of them?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4298137966377572665&hl=en

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1755692679103175934&hl=en

11

Deuchars,

Edinburgh 20/04/2008 15:05:54
12 Wally

Wally, you have gone to the dark side and joined Djookers troll site, you are no longer welcome here.
12

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 15:14:22
10
The Spook in Leith,
--------------------------
Hey Dude ,

U sound very wigged out (strung out) dude.

Were U caught stealing WIC coupons from STATER Bros. Grocery Stores. in Southern Cal.

U must have been on vacation in Southern Cal to do a crime like that .

If that was Ur first offense here in the US, u could be hit with a misdemeanor. Or worse a felony, and U would do time in jail. And get banned from re-entering the US.

U won't escape dude, since we finger print, all foreigners entering our country at all our international Airports.

Calm down dude. Crack open a Bud Light.


GC
13

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 15:25:10
12
Wally,
By The Rivers Of Babylon
-------------------------------

Hey Dude,

Did U notice, that ALL our TV networks on 04/19/08 gave a nano second sound byte of recognition, to the crime committed in WACO Texas 1993 against American citizens by our US Government.

read this web site link;

http://www.serendipity.li/waco.html

GC
14

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 15:27:39
12
Wally,
By The Rivers Of Babylon
-----------------------
Janet Reno was one ugly woman. Very smart but boy is she ugly.

GC
15

Haggis MacBagpipes,

Central Canada - ex Perth & Glesca' 20/04/2008 15:51:43
#11 - The Spook in Leith, Leith.

For what it is worth, I agree with you 100% If Hillary can't get everything her own way, she will resort to tears or start digging dirt on anyone who opposes her.

She is all hard-faced tart and the last thing anyone should want, including the Aggravated States of America, is to have her as their President.
Cheers,
Haggis MacBagpipes™©
16

Kelvino,

NY 20/04/2008 16:29:52
The USA needs a socialist president, a person who will make the government bigger than ever, spend all of our money on whimsical programs and send all of us CASH
right before an election ! Go for it ! Forget perks and entitlements. . . . just send M O N E Y !
Our Republican Socialist mentality at work !
17

Bird of Prey, Will watch what i say.,

Dallas 20/04/2008 19:13:50
#20 Spook

Oh spook you are a funny loon. Look i have moved to Dallas, erm in Moray that is..
18

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 20:09:40
19
The Spook in Leith,
Leith
------------------------------
U wrote:
Fcuk wit..

Boy how intelligent is that.

Dude,
Name calling is the resort of those, who lack self -confidence and are juvenile, and its a crude substitute for discussion or argument.


Comprendo Senior Spook.

Chill out Dude...and crack open a Coors light !!!

GC
19

henrymanchester,

UK 20/04/2008 21:02:05
Lets face it, were all screwed whoever wins.

Here and in the U.S.
20

Angus Ogg,

20/04/2008 21:24:44
Dear Heathrow Airport Customs & Immigration,

PLEASE be on the lookout for an American visitor trying to gain illegal entry to the UK.

He will be clearly doped up on magic mushrooms and is threatening to fornicate all over our beautiful Ben Nevis and cover it with white stuff, and I don't mean snow.

He will also exhibit mental instability, though I think the reason for your being able to arrest and deport him will be for Moral Turpitude as the Yanks call it.

That is:-

1. A self-confessed drug addict, &

2. A self confessed public sexual offender.

Also, he has a criminal ignorance of Scottish and UK history, and he has no means of supporting himself. He has never had a job and scrounges money off of his mother.

All in all an undesireable who, under no circumstances should be admitted through UK Immigration.

Deport back to the colonies. That is if they will accept him. More likely they won't want him back either.

Thankyou.

A Grateful Nation.
21

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 20/04/2008 22:24:54
I've been corrected from my assertion in #12. Obama's web page did used to say he wanted to leave troops in Iraq to protect Iraq and to attack other countries from the US bases in Iraq. However, now he says he wants a withdrawal over 16 months of all combat troops, but he says he wants to leave enough to protect our embassy. and so some Americans are getting excited over Obama. But in our experience the leaders of both parties lie all the time. I do know that Obama has been voting to provide war-funding for the Iraq war. and I also know he says he wants to continue the Afghanistan war and it seems like he's in favor of attacking Iran.
22

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 23:41:44
25
The Spook in Leith,
Leith
-------------------------------
--Dude I am fanatical, about freedom of speech, and free speech .

I have never, and will never, ask a moderator to remove
a post.

And NO , I did not, and have not reported Ur posts .

Why should I dude.

If U want to post scribes that U write through Ur orifice, when the sun don't shine that's ur decision.

GC
23

jondrock,

Indiana USA 21/04/2008 00:25:26
HiLIARy Clinton's experience is relative to the number of times she has avoided prosecution for lying, her involvment in 'gates(whitewater, healthcare, travel, Bosnia sniper, Irish peace accord, peace in Africa,named after Sir Edmund, etc.) She claims participation in all the GOOD things hubby BJ did, but denies any involvement in the failures of BJ.
24

57Nomad,

california 22/04/2008 21:42:13
From the article:

"The Republican senator has appeared to retreat on promises to close Guantanamo Bay, and it is unclear how much he would trust the United Nations to solve the world's problems"

Unclear how much he would trust the UN to solve the worlds problems? Why would any sane person trust the UN to solve the worlds problem. Create problems, yes. Extend and exacerbate problems, yes. Solve problems, no. The UN is a joke.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Who would make the best Democratic challenger for President?
Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.