Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Free parking: 'Latest handout will cost Lothian NHS £1m a year'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 September 2008
THE government's latest giveaway – free parking at most of Scotland's hospitals – will be widely welcomed, but it will open them up once more to accusations of pursuing populist policies with little regard for the consequences.
It is not the first time the SNP will stand charged with attempting to buy popularity. In its election manifesto last year it pledged to deliver on a number of areas which looked likely vote winners. And, to give the government credit, to date it h
as delivered on most. But all are at a cost to the public purse.

The phasing out of prescription charges has gone ahead but in three years time, when they are totally free, the initiative will cost £57 million a year to deliver. As promised, bridge tolls on the Forth and Tay were abolished, bringing them into line with the Erskine and Skye bridges where charges no longer applied.

But, while the average motorist crossing the Forth each day is £200 a year better off, the bridge operators are £12m a year poorer and have to find other ways of raising the money to pay for the maintenance of the structure.

The timing of that move was also questionable. Tolls were abolished at a time when it was revealed a new bridge might be required. And while the SNP has still to reveal how it is going to raise the estimated £4 billion needed to pay for a new crossing, the opportunity to gather at least part of the revenue required over the years until it has been completed has been thrown away.

The end of the student graduate endowment was another popular move, but one which will cost £20m a year.

Few will argue with the scrapping of hospital parking charges, which has been branded a "tax on the sick". Those attending or visiting the Western or St John's will benefit, but the SNP's latest handout will cost NHS Lothian almost £1m a year and the health service in Scotland £5.5m annually.

NHS Lothian says it makes no money from parking and that the money collected only covers the running costs. But now it will have to find revenue to keep them open and maintained from other sources. Ironically the most expensive hospital car parks – like those at the ERI – will escape the net as they are privately run. The government has no power to scrap charges at hospitals built under PFI agreements and the cost of buying out the long term contracts from the firms that run them will have been too prohibitive, even for the free spending SNP.

It is OK for the SNP to play Robin Hood if they wish. But they should remember it is other people's money that they are giving away with seemingly little regard to the impact it will have or for how they will make up any shortfall in their budgets. At some point the books are going to have to balance.





The full article contains 503 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 September 2008 9:49 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Joe,

Cables Wynd 02/09/2008 12:22:50
Time the SNP had another look at the totally unnecessary M74 extension..The £500M plus motorway
is a road to nowhere and won't bring them any more votes in an already blighted city.. £500M plus could be pumped into the NHS and Schools...
2

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

02/09/2008 13:25:26
YOu may not be able to get a hip operation, but at least you'll be able to park for free at the hospital while you're told you can't have it. Thank The Socialist Nationalist party.
3

Tynietiger,

02/09/2008 13:50:23
The abolition of car parking charges will be warmly welcomed by NHS staff and by frequent visitors.

Also # 2, waiting times have been greatly reduced under the SNP Scottish government.

It is committed to a public national health service unlike Labour who are privatising the Health Service south of the Border where it is becoming more like the American system year by year.
4

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 02/09/2008 14:14:46
"It is OK for the SNP to play Robin Hood if they wish. But they should remember it is other people's money that they are giving away with seemingly little regard to the impact it will have or for how they will make up any shortfall in their budgets."

Once again the Hootsman gets it wrong. The money is not other people's money being given away. The money belongs to hard working Scots who have to reach into their pocket to park before they visit the hospital. To put it simply, it is a parking tax. Paying this tax impacts the home budgets of Scots and creates a shortfall in the personal accounts of our citizens.

The people of Scotland need releif from wasters and media dinosaurs who think that their pay packets are there for goverment to reach into at a whim. We work hard for our pay and we would like to keep some of it to meet our priorities. With food prices, gas prices, gas prices, housing costs all going up immensely, Scots need to keep what they can to meet those bills. F

For my family, if its a choice between food on the table and paying a parking tax, I choose food.

Thankfully, we have a Scottish government who understands that. Unfortunately, the Hootsman and Westminster are still out of touch and out of time.

5

Jwil,

02/09/2008 16:35:50
"It is OK for the SNP to play Robin Hood if they wish. But they should remember it is other people's money that they are giving away with seemingly little regard to the impact it will have or for how they will make up any shortfall in their budgets"


Yes, and its peoples money that the health board are taking in parking charges! They didn't always have parking charges. Now it seems they cannot do without them.
6

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/09/2008 17:46:24
The EEN Nu Lab leader-writer slavers again.
7

Grumpy,

02/09/2008 19:58:20
Here's an easy way to save up the £57m it will cost - scrap the trams
8

Stuart W,

Dundee 02/09/2008 21:55:10
4 a proud doonhamer,Dumfries 02/09/2008 14:14:46

You miss the point.

The 'parking tax' might be abolished, but if you get rid of one tax then you have to find the lost revenue elsewhere, a point that seems to have totally eluded your post.

The choice you put forward between putting food on the table and paying a parking tax is apt, because the reality is that there's no such thing as a free lunch.
9

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 02/09/2008 23:32:43
"It is OK for the SNP to play Robin Hood if they wish. But they should remember it is other people's money that they are giving away with seemingly little regard to the impact it will have or for how they will make up any shortfall in their budgets. At some point the books are going to have to balance"

Same thing could be said about the tram scheme which this newspaper has supported, despite the fact that it knew perfectly well that the scheme would make barely a dent on congestion levels. This article is quite astonishing in its hypocrisy.
10

Plug-,

03/09/2008 00:18:43
Surely the NHS should be giving back the millions it coined in by charging relatives visiting sick relatives?

The anti SNP political posturing in this article is so thick it's opaque.

Sigh.
11

patientpower,

03/09/2008 16:18:42
The revenue lost from the "tax on the sick" is nothing compared to what NHS Lothian lost by selling off public assets cheaply (Gogarburn etc etc etc....) to service their debts and cover their overspend, or indeed the £30,000 plus that they spent on parking barriers for St John's which they were unable to install as they didn't have planning permission that’s more wasted Tax payers money have them account for that someone should! Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones and riding to the rescue of a board guilty of neglect of public finances in relation to raising more revenue for them to squander seems a might foolhardy to me.
12

Nurse a4c,

08/09/2008 15:34:23
#11 Let me guess your from west lothian??
13

,

22/10/2008 19:00:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the health service right to restrict agency staff numbers to cut costs?
The NHS should never have to cut costs. Give it what it needs.
They should have enough full-timers in the first place.
Yes, as long as there’s enough staff to cope.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.