Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Wealth gap between city and Glasgow getting wider

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
08 November 2007
EDINBURGH has significantly increased the "wealth gap" between itself and struggling cities such as Glasgow, according to a new study published today.
The Capital's economic boom has seen its ability to generate wealth jump from 29 per cent above the national average to 46 per cent since Labour came to power in 1997.

Research by right-leaning think-tank Policy Exchange examined the fortunes of
18 towns and cities which have received significant government funding for urban renewal over the past decade.

It concluded that Britain's poorest towns and cities have fallen further behind in the past ten years despite more than £30 billion of regeneration initiatives.

The study concluded that the ability to generate wealth - measured as Gross Value Added (GVA) - in its sample of 18 poorer towns and cities had fallen from seven per cent below the national average to 14 per cent below in the last ten years.

By comparison, a sample group of successful towns and cities, including Edinburgh, had increased its lead over the average from 29 per cent to 46 per cent.

Business groups today said the diversity of economic interest in the Capital was helping it go from strength to strength.

Ron Hewitt, chief executive of the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "Edinburgh has done a good job of focusing on what it does well.

"The city has done well in taking forward areas such as life sciences or financial services that introduce new markets to replace areas such as traditional manufacturing.

"But as well as taking Edinburgh forward at macro level we have also been encouraging help at the other end of the scale.

"Initiatives such as the business incubators in Craigmillar allow the poorer areas of the city to also contribute to the creation of wealth that we are experiencing in Edinburgh."

The 18 struggling towns and cities in the study were: Blackburn, Blackpool, Bradford, Coventry, Glasgow, Hastings, Hull, Leicester, Liverpool, Merthyr Tydfil, Sheffield, Southampton, Stockton-on-Tees, Stoke-on-Trent, Sunderland, Walsall, Warrington and Wigan. The successful sample was: Edinburgh, Windsor-Maidenhead, Peterborough, Bristol, Milton Keynes and Swindon.

The report concludes that "successful towns are becoming more successful, poorer towns are becoming less successful". This is a trend reflected in personal incomes across the UK where the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.

Policy Exchange chief economist Dr Oliver Hartwich said the study showed that funding for problem towns and cities was not helping them catch up.

"If anything, they are slipping farther behind while successful towns are stretching their lead," he said.

"While we should not give up on urban policy, much of the £30bn spent in the last decade appears to have had no effect.

"Britain needs to consider policies that will make it easier for people to work in places that have high productivity and therefore offer high wages."



RISING COST OF LIVING


THE daily cost of living is soaring in Scotland because of a bad harvest and world fuel price hikes.

Grocery bills have reached record highs and unleaded petrol has broken the £1 a litre barrier for the first time.

The Scottish Retail Consortium's shop price index shows prices in all shops across Scotland were 1.1 per cent higher at the end of October than at the same time last year - the biggest rise since records began.

And the average bill for a weekly trip to the supermarket has shot up from £92 to £105 since June.

A loaf of bread is around 6p dearer, a pint of milk is up 5p and a packet of cereal costs an extra 20p.

Experts blame this year's extremely poor harvest and devastating summer floods.

And a global grain shortage has seen prices rise from £65 per ton two years ago to £117 per ton last month, while European stock has fallen dramatically.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2007 11:08 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Glasgow and Edinburgh
 
1

eric-shaun,

Lothian 08/11/2007 12:30:11

I can't get my head around this, must be because Edinburgh has no decent shops to spent your money in.

2

House Prices for real,

08/11/2007 12:42:00

#2 if your gonna do an impression of eric REMEMBER that after every comma, A capital letter is required. Top marks for spelling tho !!

3

Calum Crubag,

08/11/2007 12:43:35

Glasgow is great for live music, museums and many other events. Some of the shopping though is too exclusive, especially for a city with vast areas of poverty. How can the 'trendies' in the media just ignore all the squalor and violence?

4

eric,

Lothian 08/11/2007 12:45:43

Id hate to be working class in Edinburgh ,Its the same in Glasgow the gap between wealthy and poor is getting larger,The Airport rail link will be goosd for Glasgow and Scotland.

5

Jam Tarts 1874,

On the Rebound 08/11/2007 12:46:11

So, in an independent Scotland, how do you SNP voters in Edinburgh feel about the prospect of subsidising Glasgow?

6

Ecto,

London 08/11/2007 12:58:27

Independence for Edinburgh is the only way forward, leave the loony lefties in the West to run their communist society!!!

7

Ecto,

London 08/11/2007 12:59:34

Independence for Edinburgh is the only route forward!!!!!

Leave the lefties in the West to their dole queues and free state handouts whilst the rest of us earn our living!!

8

Jaco Pastorius,

Maine 08/11/2007 13:09:50

Couple of points, Boswall:

1. "ie" should be "i.e." as it represents the Latin "id est", meaning "that is to say". It's not a word in itself.

2. It's "businesses" not "business's" in your last sentence - plural, not possessive.

3. To avoid ambiguity, "bn" should really be "billion" in your second sentence. "Bn" can mean "battalion", "bossa nova", "boron nitride", "bank note", "broadband network", "Bombardier/Navigator" or about fifty other things.

Just trying to help ...

9

Tepid Mouse,

08/11/2007 13:42:20

Has anyone read the report? More stats and information that frankly is so generalised and outdated that it is not worth the paper it is written on. Besides, everyone knows that our post-industrial cities are taking longer to get themselves back on their feet and that the middle-class smaller areas are performing well. Who pays these people to tell us what we already know?

10

antifa,

Ed 08/11/2007 13:55:05

#2 I think you might need a refresher course on economics.

#7/8 Yes, we ignored you the first time.

11

Jaco Pastorius,

Maine 08/11/2007 13:56:38

Alex Paterson does, Tepid. It's his fault.

12

alex patersons English teacher,

08/11/2007 14:04:03

12.
alex paterson does tepid,now thats a story,its unbeleivable.

13

Irn-Bruce,

Edinburgh 08/11/2007 14:06:10

#5

The Glasgow Airport Rail Link doesn't help anyone who can't get to Central Station easily.

Coming from the East, I wouldn't fancy arriving with 20-25kg of luggage at Queen Street and then lugging over to Central - especially at rush hour (if that's when you had to do it because of your flight time).

Even in it's new cut-down incarnation, the Edinburgh Airport rail link offers better connectivity to a wider area.

14

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

Cammo 08/11/2007 14:23:49

Glasgow is the worst performing Local Education authority in Scotland measured by exam pass rates.
Address that issue and Glasgow might begin to flourish on its own and without the need for the massive public subsidies it has enjoyed for more years than I care to remember.
It is generally accepted that a knowledge-based economy is now vital to the UK.
Education, in my experience, is key to that.
Edinburgh has its share of 'kewl too be thik' neds. Glasgow seems to have a far higher per capita representation of this underclass.

15

,

08/11/2007 15:04:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1126641, Article id was mapped to record!
16

,

08/11/2007 15:19:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Eustace "Gripper" Almonds,

Selkirk 08/11/2007 16:31:22

I'm disgusted.

18

glaswegian at heart,

florida u s a 08/11/2007 16:59:10

if england would give scotland credit were it's due e.g. anything made in Scotland is labeled u.k but goods made south of the border ,the credit is given to england.Why do the english hate Glaswegians? Grow up!WasTHAT theRab C.Nesbitt in an earlier comment?

19

glaswegian at heart,

florida u s a 08/11/2007 17:07:18

I am convinced , the ENGLISH don't like Glaswegians and the Government treats them accordingly.

20

Johnspain,

08/11/2007 18:17:15

It's all down to the brown sauce in the chippies.

21

glaswegian at heart,

florida u s a 08/11/2007 18:42:56

Johnspain that is funny .who can deny the sense of humour of the keelies

22

bill inch,

Edinburgh 09/11/2007 01:51:36

Wasters

23

D. Graham,

Paisley 09/11/2007 16:04:26

The only reason that Glasgow has been portrayed as a city of poverty is because the 'City of Glasgow' isnt a true representation of the whole city, home to over 2 million people. Greater Glasgow is home to the largest number of millionaires in Scotland, and suburbs of Glasgow such as Giffnock, Bearsden, Whitecraigs, Newton Mearns, Thorntonhall etc, among the wealthiest in the country, are artificially cut out of the city boundary. Anyone who believes that Glasgow hasnt become a more successful city over the last few years in delusional. The city's economic growth rate has outstripped Edinburgh's for the last few years. The only information conveyed by this article and the subsequent comments is the bitterness and jealousy that the Edinburgh media and inhabitants still nurture.

24

glaswegian at heart,

florida usa 09/11/2007 18:07:02

D.Graham Paisley you hit the nail on the head


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.