Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Diageo slams Government's alcohol plans



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 August 2008
DIAGEO, the world's biggest drinks company, will this week launch a scathing attack on the Scottish Government's clampdown on binge drinking, accusing it of failing to target those who misuse alcohol with a series of ineffective and unnecessary proposals that will penalise the responsible drinker.
The proposals, currently out for consultation, include banning under-21s from buying alcohol in off-sales, a minimum price of alcohol per unit, and separate alcohol checkouts in supermarkets to deter impulse buys.

But Diageo will warn that most of the proposals will not work as they "lack evidence", place the responsibility for tackling alcohol misuse on the shoulders of the drinks industry and fail to recognise the role of society, government and the individual in tackling alcohol misuse.

The makers of Smirnoff vodka, Johnnie Walker scotch and Guinness will call for a new system of co-regulation for alcohol promotions and a rigorous code of practice.

In a strongly worded response to the Scottish Government's discussion paper, Changing Scotland's Relationship with Alcohol, Benet Slay, managing director of Diageo Great Britain, argues that creating separate checkouts for alcohol sales is unnecessary and ineffective; a one-size-fits-all blanket ban on promotions will penalise responsible drinkers; while raising the minimum age for buying alcohol to 21 is disproportionate and unfair.

He said: "Quite frankly we are frustrated and disillusioned with the way the proposals have been put together and the way the consultation has taken place. We need to target those who misuse alcohol and we need evidence-based solutions to do that, but there isn't any evidence which directly links many of the proposals in the Scottish consultation paper and alcohol harm.

"Higher prices may affect consumption, but not necessarily among the groups the Government wishes to target. The creation of a separate aisle may just drive people into different shopping patterns."

Slay admitted that the drinks firm had not analysed how much the proposals would cost the industry but said it "is a concern".

He said: "We believe the most effective approach to promoting the highest standards of responsible behaviour, across industry and for every consumer, is through a fair, transparent and effective system of co-regulation."

The financial cost of alcohol-related crime in Scotland is estimated at £379m per year, while the human cost is higher. An NHS audit of assaults presenting to hospital emergency departments found 70% involved drink.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Alcohol misuse costs Scotland at least £2.25bn every year and it's affecting our health service, our criminal justice system and our economy. It's not the drink, it's how we're drinking it and we need to take action now to rebalance our relationship with alcohol.

"We've outlined a bold package of measures, from minimum pricing to tackling irresponsible promotions, which together we think can start to change Scotland's relationship with alcohol for the better."


The full article contains 483 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 August 2008 11:39 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 31/08/2008 00:56:45
"But Diageo will warn that most of the proposals will not work as they "lack evidence", place the responsibility for tackling alcohol misuse on the shoulders of the drinks industry and fail to recognise the role of society, government and the individual in tackling alcohol misuse"

Heaven forbid that the Drinks "Industry" should shoulder any responsibility whatsoever for the Binge drinking......
2

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 31/08/2008 08:16:49
I'm with the SNP 100% on this...at least they appear to be TRYING to change things. The Drinks Industry has its own selfish reasons for stopping them...
3

rpb,

31/08/2008 10:08:10
If I lived in a dead end scheme in a country where it gets dark at 4pm in winter, and it rains most of the year...I would demand my right to get hammered also.

This has less to do with the drinks industry (alcohol is available in most countries, no 2),more to do with the pathetic scottish mentality that thinks alcohol is only for getting steaming...

If the SNP were convinced it is the industry's fault, and not the morons who drink to oblivion, then why don't they shut down all the distilleries & brewers?



4

Aye Right...,

31/08/2008 10:22:07
They should do something but these draconian proposals are like something from Prohibition America.

Even if they stated that you had to be 21 or over to buy alcohol with an abv greater than 5% that at least would make it more awkward for the wee jakies to buy their White Lightning and Buckie. Even at that they will still get round it..

It will be the more social drinkers like students and those with no desire to throw cheap wine and alcopops down their necks that will hit.
5

SwissToni,

A neutral corner 31/08/2008 15:06:17
This has become a national tradegy:

"The financial cost of alcohol-related crime in Scotland is estimated at £379m per year, while the human cost is higher. An NHS audit of assaults presenting to hospital emergency departments found 70% involved drink.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Alcohol misuse costs Scotland at least £2.25bn every year and it's affecting our health service, our criminal justice system and our economy............"

On top of this, there is also the alcohol induced social misery suffered by families and children that has not been unaccounted for

Shame on DIAGEO for taking such an unsupportive stance (I wonder why??!!) and hats off to the a Scottish Goverment who has at least recognised that the the social blight that alcohol mis-use has become requires our urgent attention

One final thought. The perceived distinction between alcohol and street drugs forms a serious obstacle in getting people to change their attitude and drinking habits. Alcohol is a highly addictive drug yet we continue to allow the authorised pushers to advertise and have a big input to the way the market operates. I believe it is time that "The Drink Industry" began to recognise the privelaged and responsible role that they hold in society. Otherwise, review their authority
6

Alan B,

31/08/2008 17:36:13
The problem with DIAGEO outburst, is Scotland is where it is. Is it previous government policy failures? Is it inevitable? Is the drink industry partially responsible?

Rather than critising in the way they have, Daigo really should come up with alternative counter proposals. Persuade people of that their alternatives are a better solution.

The drinks industry has pushed drink at youngsters with alco pops so really should not be surprised that its short term strategy ends up turning round and biting it.

Shops have for so long (illegally) sold to underage drinkers. So if the drinks industry has not pushed a responsible line what does it expect now.

I personally can see nothing wrong witn a proposal to stop selling alcohol in off licences to under 21s. I would be quite happy to reduce the age of drinking to 17 in pubs.

The problem with alcohol sold in off licences is that it then becomes hard to police, to stop street drinking and the associated trouble that can cause. It also is a main source for even younger drinkers.

Having 18+ drinking in pubs, is a safe and regulated environment. Lets face it most of us at that age drink in pubs. Its about socialising.
7

danielrober,

31/08/2008 18:29:16
When i was 14 i spent a little time in the Nederlands. Everyone drank at 14 - it was great. But it also encouraged respondsible drinking. By 16/17 most kids had grwn out of that stuff and had mopeds instead.

Not all alchol management methods need be so puritan. The Dutch method worked well.
8

Charlie Ferrier,

Hamilton 01/09/2008 00:04:23
Unbelievable arrogance on the part of the biggest player in the drinks industry. Big alcohol, Big Tobaco!!!

The drinks industry should pay a separate levi to fund anti drinking advertising. Further all alcohol products should carry warnings about the health effects of consuming too much alcohol - liver failure, brain damage etc.

How dare they even think about critisizing goverment proposed solutions to a problem they have created. The design of alco pops in particular is reminiscent of the Tobaco industry's behaviour - get them young and get them hooked!

The drinks industry controls many of the pubs and clubs people drink in as well. Much of the addtional societal damage is directly engineered by the industry with their promotional drinking campaingns, the attributtion of mythological prowess to the male if he drinks, the "girls can be just as tough as the boys" campaingns - all done to protect an increasingly gicantic profit.

The drinks industry should be charged with coming up with a solution funded by them or face the consequences. It may be that they should pay a levi for every drinks related accident and compensation for every drinks related death - starting at 50,000 pounds per victim plus costs going up to 1,000,000 per death plus costs. Let us place responsibility where it truly lies.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.