Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sunk? World-first organic cod farm that fed the stars is in receivership



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 February 2008
IT WAS hailed as a revolution in fish farming – Shetland's home-grown organic answer to the devastation facing cod stocks in the Atlantic and the North Sea.
As the producer of the world's first 100 per cent organic and sustainably farmed cod, No Catch grabbed headlines across the globe when the company launched its pioneering product four years ago.

The Vidlin-based firm's cod was soon on the shelves
of Britain's leading supermarket chains and on the menu at the renowned French Laundry restaurant in California's Napa Valley – where Hollywood star Demi Moore was one of the first to sample the new and distinctive Scottish product.

But in a major blow for the Northern Isles, it was revealed yesterday that the company has gone into receivership with the loss of up to 130 jobs.

No Catch was formed after a management buyout of the local company Johnson Seafarms.

Speculation about the long-term future of the company intensified earlier this year when it was announced that No Catch was seeking fresh backing, either in the form of new owners or investment.

Its managing director is Karol Rzepkowski, a Scot of Polish descent who once ran a Caribbean diving school.

However, it was revealed yesterday that Daniel Smith and Robert Caven, partners in the corporate-recovery firm Grant Thornton, had been appointed joint administrators of the company.

No Catch, which operates 27 sea farms off the Shetland coast, also produces organic salmon and trout, and has a cod hatchery in Sandwick, a factory in Scalloway, a head office in Vidlin and an office in Edinburgh.

A spokeswoman for the joint administrators said: "The company has 12,000 tonnes per annum of licensed cod farming capacity, a processing plant and a premium organic brand.

"The business was founded in the 1980s as a salmon farming business and focused on organic cod farming in 2003."

Mr Smith last night confirmed that negotiations were under way with several potential purchasers.

Mr Smith said: "The administrators are talking to a number of parties interested in acquiring the business or parts of the business. We will be working with the Shetland Development Trust to find a solution which preserves the business and employment on the islands."

The Shetland Development Trust is understood to have £1.1 million invested in the firm.

Mr Smith added: "The quantum of start-up funding required had been underestimated by management and shareholders.

"We understand that the majority shareholder of the company, Milestone Capital Partners Limited, had reached its funding limits and attempts by advisers and management to raise further funding were not successful.

"Significant finance has been committed to the development of the business, which has successfully launched a sales channel and proven its technical ability to farm organic cod.

"Although the company has started to produce sales, the stock of farmed cod is immature, currently limiting turnover."

Betty Fullerton, the councillor for Shetland Central, said: "This is very disappointing news because there are obviously a lot of jobs involved and that would be my main concern.

"I would certainly hope that some sort of package can be put together to retain as many of the jobs as possible on the islands."

The company rears up to four million cod, weighing up to 9lb at its sites in sea lochs around the Shetland coast.

Cod are fed with offcuts of wild herring and mackerel, and are raised in large circular pens where only 2 per cent of the space is ever filled by fish.

In its first year of trading, the company more than doubled its turnover from £3.5 million to £8 million.

The firm recently extended its range of products with the launch of "No Catch – Just Sea Trout" in Tesco stores.







The full article contains 637 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 February 2008 9:23 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Fish farming industry
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 00:19:29
If the greed hadn't come into this..'fad'..this would not be news!
2

jerrymanders,

Fashing, just fashing. 20/02/2008 00:54:08
What a disaster for the plaice.
3

,

20/02/2008 01:33:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA....Bye Bye Bush -Cheney..u. evil lead 20/02/2008 02:06:48
Sunk? World-first organic cod farm that fed the stars is in receivership .
-------------------------------------

If all Scots invested just £2, this great enterprise could continue. And buy time to get profitable with new hard hitting mean and lean management..

Once again people don't care . All talk no action

GC
5

chippie lover,

Glasgow 20/02/2008 02:48:21
Its a shame that they have calle din the receivers. I have had their cod before and it looked better than the other cod that the shops were selling at the time.
6

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 20/02/2008 06:55:56
Why did it fail? It's not really clear (to me).
7

Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD,

Dar-Es-Salaam 20/02/2008 06:59:48
Sir:
There was a time in the Malthusian times, the economist Robert Malthus, declared that a time would come when we would run short of food. He worked scientifically stating that , “Food we produced, had was at the arithmetic proportion, that is 2+2+2 while, the population is multiplying with geometric proportion that is 2*2*2…thereby we would run short of food. He however did not foresee the human bring to have the land reclaimed form the oceans, the GM food,(the puffed up turkey , tomatoes, cow having no food value but feeds the family), the mountains and the rivers foods like fish, animals and the other countries trading with very cheap products for the coins.
Well we proved him wrong. We have the dilemma now about the fuel. Same way we had the above. We will leave the oil and make some sort of gas from the carrots, can beets, cabbages. What we have forgotten is, the poor barely trying to live on these, will have to beg.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD
P.O.Box 6044
Dar-Es-Salaam
Tanzania
East Africa

8

Yokel,

20/02/2008 07:32:36
Cod is not exactly ones first choice unless your into fish fingers. Hardly a luxury choice but if old Malthus was half right maybe food will be a luxury soon.
Selling into supermarkets should not be a producer's first choice. How are you going to fund rapid expansion by having your selling price hammered down while the customer dictates you quality control pushing your costs up?
9

Kate,

Zurich 20/02/2008 07:54:04
Damn shame, I had their cod here in Zurich about 6 weeks ago from my local supermarket and it was very good, almost too cheap, especially compared to the other fish on offer!

Galactic Cannibal, if you can set up a donations website for your suggestion of £2 per Scot, I'll be in on it! Great idea...
10

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 20/02/2008 08:13:36
#7 from Dar.

Malthus was not wrong. Inventions have only delayed the arrival of global starvation. The world problem is that we are having far too many children. If couples had just two then the population would smoothly decrease and we could survive. What is the point of saving children in Africa if they are saved only to die later of AIDS, war or famine or disease? We don't want surplus Africans to migrate to Europe, as Africans rightly don't welcome surplus Europeans.
11

Erse,

Middle East 20/02/2008 08:41:27
Can't captain Darling bail them out?
12

Fairfax,

20/02/2008 08:48:33
Firozali (7): "Well we proved him wrong."

We'd certainly like to believe that Malthus' pessimism was incorrect, but there's really no evidence for that. His point was that future food production would be sub-exponential, so would ultimately be exceeded by the exponential growth in population. The example of arithmetic growth you've given is only part of his argument: the same would apply for any algebraic growth, since exponential growth ultimately beats algebraic. Malthus, incidentally, had graduated very near the top of his mathematical class at Cambridge, before marrying and becoming a clergyman.
13

The Strategist,

20/02/2008 10:25:02
Not an unusual story. Lots of Scottish companies are undercapitalised in relation to what they're trying to achieve. Drip feeding funding is very much a Scottish thing. In the USA they make sure companies are properly funded from day one. Mind you they were lucky to find it in the first place.
14

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 20/02/2008 10:28:40
The 'Big Lie' in all 'fish farming' is that it is 'sustainable'. The key to this article is where it says "Cod are fed with offcuts of wild herring and mackerel,". In the case of salmon they are fed with fish pellets made from wild sandeels. It takes something like 6lbs of wild fish to make 1 lb of farmed fish ( I think it could actually be a 12:1 ratio!!)
so from the outset - all these 'farming' ideas depend on stripping the oceans of everything that swims. That is why the puffins and guillemots cannot breed around Shetland. That is why the wild cod cannot recover - because we are knocking the bottom out of the food chain.

If we had a truly sustainable fishing policy - backed by law and armed patrol ships to keep the Spanish, the French and the Poles out of our waters - Scotland and the UK would have fish for the next 10,000 years. But if we continue to allow Europe to rape the North Sea and the Western ocean - we will end up with no wild salmon, no wild cod, no puffins, no guillemots, no kittiwakes - just fish farms in every loch and river mouth. But they'll have to find a synthetic protein - tofu? - to feed the buggers on because there will be no wild fish stocks to turn into fish food.
15

,

20/02/2008 11:27:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Navvy,

20/02/2008 13:13:11
#6 & 14 make sense

Where is the truth?
17

AJ Fife,

20/02/2008 13:33:34
The answer is free range fish farming.

Challenging, I know, but the fish would taste as if it was wild!!

Yup I've gone mad!!
18

danielrober,

20/02/2008 13:47:28
I'm surpised that a company such as this failed and would put it down to internal reasons rather than industrial. As for money, well we are all tempted to push too quickly or else we lose the market opportunity. Its a gamble, between GO and HOLD, that's business.

Still no reason why a buyer can't snap up this up this great oppoortunity.
19

Chris,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 16:56:40
Obviously there is the period where the fish need to be nurtured, but cannot be harvested because they are immature. Any company with shareholders would have to take a fine line where financial outgoing is greater than income. Presumably the firm was offsetting this loss through farmed salmon- and the Norwegians would have put paid to that by flooding the Scottish market with cheaper product.
#14 Tweedmouth,Coldstream: The Spanish, French and Poles are not allowed to fish in our waters - i.e. the 12 mile limit which complies with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. See http://www.ukho.gov.uk/cons/pdf/UK%20TS%20Limit%201%20January%202006.pdf.
20

Van (not white) Diesel,

Amsterdam & Augsburg 20/02/2008 17:02:13
Sorry, but it just has to be said - CODSWALLOP!
21

Fabius Maximus,

20/02/2008 19:46:44
Can't the Scottish Government nationalise it? It would be interesting to consider what the Scottish position is on nationalisation and nationalism. Could we nationalise Scottish Water? Could the nation own its windfarms, both on and off shore? If there is profit to be made by UK and international companies from managing Scotland's national resources, why should the people of Scotland not make these profits and own the products of our resources ourselves?

I'm seriously suggesting we should think about it. We could nationalise in a different way from the failed UK post war schemes. Get rid of quangos, have public sector housing which was genuinely owned by the public. Sto the fiasco of islanders having to try to outbid eccentric millionaires to save the land they live on, and make sure every Scot has a share - a literal share - in the land.
22

Gina Gibson,

Wales 20/02/2008 21:45:03
Hmmmm it sounds a bit fishy to me!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.