Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Film review: Stone Of Destiny



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 October 2008
(PG)

Director: Charles Martin Smith
Running time: 96 minutes

**
BLOWS to the head are delivered with more subtlety than Stone Of Destiny, which begins with a skirl of bagpipes and a camera racing across some piece of the Highlands in the shadow of an old castle. Can you guess which country we're in yet?

It's a
Sunday Post-coated version of Scotland, with restful scenery and mince with everything. It all seems so familiar, I eventually realised where I'd seen it before – at one of those "living museums" in which drama students don puffy shirts and tartanalia to demonstrate tweed weaving and oatcake bakes.

The stealing of the Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day 1950 has the makings of a good Ealing-style heist movie. But you need energy and zip to get a blimp like this off the ground, and this picture struggles to generate much engagement or excitement. For instance, the brains behind the abduction, Ian Hamilton, is played by Charlie Cox, a sweet-faced English actor who gamely straps on the accent but struggles with a lead role so blankly intangible that you can't tell if he has the makings of a star or just the next Orlando Bloom.

The cast also includes Stephen McCole as the stone's heavy lifter, Gavin Vernon, and Billy Boyd as Hamilton's best friend, who pulls out of the mission when he thinks it is becoming too risky. Both are students at Glasgow University, despite being more than 10 years older than the average postgraduate, but you have to give writer/director Charles Martin Smith full marks for getting value from the university, which not only plays itself, but also Edinburgh and part of Westminster Abbey. In supporting roles there's Robert Carlyle as John MacCormick, and Peter Mullan as Ian's stern and overcritical father, giving good glower over the tea table.

Those not in favour of an independent Scotland are represented by an embittered old drunk in the Glasgow University bar. In other words, the arguments for and against Scottish Nationalism are rendered as People Who Are Young And Groovy vs People Who Are Not. You needn't be an ardent Unionist to feel that the some of the finer points of Scotland's devolution debate may have been lost here. This wouldn't matter much if the story was deftly realised – but this is history in big concrete boots, as told to a tiny, inattentive child, who may also be hard of hearing.

This Ladybird guide to Scottishness clearly yearns for simpler times when Westminster Abbey was guarded by one old bloke with a torch and Scots attended university until they were 40, while a hunt for car keys is treated in a manner that even Brian de Palma might consider overblown. However, I did enjoy the moment when a radio announced Scotland was rejoicing over the disappearance of the Stone of Scone, and the film cut to some Glaswegians dancing in the streets with one glass of whisky. Never has national exultation been depicted with such parsimony.

Still, this sclerotically old-fashioned treatment may appeal to Scotophiles who found Monarch Of The Glen a bit edgy and unsettling. There's nothing cynical about Stone Of Destiny; its heart is firmly in the right place and, like the Stone, it's a big solid thing. But alas, also like the Stone, it feels phoney and makes for lumpy viewing.

• On general release from Friday



The full article contains 576 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2008 4:22 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Film reviews
 
1

Retiarius,

Batavadorum 11/10/2008 18:59:12
All true, but I liked it anyway. An infinitely superior production to the preposterous display staged by Michael Forsyth, former proconsul in these parts, when he brought the alleged stone to Embra Castle to make it the very jewel in the crown of the shortbread tin city ... in the hopes of bolstering Tory votes. Nae luck, eh, Michael? One, two, three ..."FREEEE-DOM!!!"
2

Retiarius,

Batavadorum 11/10/2008 21:52:30
In the spirit of the broad theme of appropriate appropriation I publish here, unilaterally and without permission, Ian Hamilton QC's magisterial verdict (on his website) on the reviews of his film in both The Hootsmon and The Herald.

REPORT ON MY STONE OF DESTINY BOOK AND FILM
By Ian Hamilton

It is not for me to be critic to my own book. It is called Stone of Destiny and you can buy it by clicking on my publisher’s link on the right hand column below. Or in any bookshop.

Neither is it for me to criticise my film. Anyone can make a film but not everyone can find a distributor. I tell this story

My film did not make the cut for the Cannes Film Festival but was shown there to try to find a distributor. It was shown three times at a small hundred seat cinema on the fringe. At these small cinemas scouts come in to watch a few frames and then move on. At the first showing they stayed. At the second showing it was crowded and they cheered at the end. At the third showing the big distributors stood and cheered. ‘We have been waiting for this’ they said. This is the sort of film the public want. Their money went with their words.

Odeon took the UK rights and it will be on general distribution throughout the UK in the autumn and over Christmas. Sky took the UK TV rights. Distribution has been taken across Canada. It has been taken by Scandinavia and also the Arab States. Australia and the USA are in negotiation. By this time they may have signed up, or it might take a year. With a start like this there is every expectation that it will go world-wide. Why has this happened? I will tell you.

The film and the book are not just about Scotland. They are about youth. Since Homer smote his blooming lyre all the great stories have been about youth. It is a universal theme. We four young people were lucky to be young at the right time. This is a happy film. It sends people out of the cinema with a smile on their faces. Whatever their nationality all the worl
3

Retiarius,

Batavadorum 11/10/2008 21:53:43
Whatever their nationality all the world loves youngsters who try to do something impossible…..and who manage to do it without hurting anyone. All the world that is except a couple of sour old codgers on the Herald and Scotsman.
What a pity the Herald and the Scotsman couldn’t find an indulgent smile for a story about youth. These two gnarled papers have their roots firmly in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In the twenty-first their tired boughs drop readership like autumn leaves. They should be given a pension and a free TV licence. Poor bodachs they have taken their place in the ingleneuk of journalism while the world passes them by.
They do not know that we are a nation once again. There is no longer any need to cringe and do down a film about youngsters who were a mere sixty years before their time. Tories, Liberals, Labour, SNP we are all nationalists now. We only disagree about how the new nation is to be governed; by ourselves or by remote control from London. The concourse of the nation in the Great Hall of Edinburgh Castle which celebrated the Stone of Destiny last weekend was of all parties. Even Michael Forsyth was invited but alas couldn’t make it. The nation rejoiced while these two old journalists warmed their hands at the embers of yesterday’s fire.
Och let them sleep on. The people of the world will see the film and make their own judgement. The great men of the film world have made theirs. It matters not what two dying newspapers say about it. Yet I am sorry. Like poor Yorick I knew them both. They were fellows of infinite jest. Now their journalists can scarce raise a decent condemnation between them.
‘Him have a film made about him!’ said one to the other.
‘Him!’ said the other in eloquent reply.
‘A kent his feyther,’ said the first one, removing his dentures.
Then they both went quietly back to sleep.
4

Seannair,

Oban 12/10/2008 21:20:19
An utterly predictable mean minded North Briton approach to a most enjoyable account of an improbable but true episode in our nation's history. Can't say about the rest of the students but young Ian Hamilton was certainly older than the average student as he had signed up for the RAF and it was some time after the war before he was discharged and entered university.



I can remember well when the news broke about the repatriation of the Stone in 1950 - Unionists should be reminded that it was stolen 600 odd years before - and the sense of excitement that it generated in a dull and dead post war Scotland. That sense of purpose has been well and truly captured again and there was recognition of that in a packed Oban cinema on Friday.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.