Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Get on with free school meals, councils told



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 October 2008
LEADERS of councils in Scotland have been told by their own top representative to get on with providing free school meals and stop complaining about funding.
However, the intervention by Pat Watters, chairman of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla), came as a report by senior directors at Fife Council – which trialed free school meals – said there was no money to pay for them.

Counci
llors in Fife will have an emergency meeting today to discuss the issue and education cuts.

Mr Watters wrote to Scotland's 32 council leaders after the majority said they had not been given the money to provide free school meals for all P1 to P3 children, estimated to be £50 million nationally.

The row has centred on whether the Scottish Government has provided funds for free meals as part of the concordat with councils – an agreement that ended ring-fencing and allowed councils to choose their own priorities. There has also been debate over whether agreeing to the "aim" of free school meals was a promise to provide them. This followed an announcement by Fiona Hyslop, the education secretary, last week that a successful pilot scheme in Fife would be rolled out across the country.

In his letter, Mr Watters, a Labour representative, said: "I have made it clear that I believe the resources for this provision are included in the overall settlement and that agreement to the settlement was made in the full knowledge that free school meals was part of that financial provision.

"I am, therefore, surprised and concerned that there appears to be a view that insufficient provision has been made for this policy or that there was no agreement by Cosla that free school meals would be provided."

He warned: "Colleagues must realise that this divergence of view strikes right to the heart of our new way of doing business with national government. If we are seen to change our mind after a negotiation has been completed we shouldn't be surprised if we are seen as a less reliable partner as a consequence."

This is not the first time Mr Watters has intervened to support the SNP government. During the negotiation on the concordat, he attacked Wendy Alexander, Labour leader at the time, over her claims that services would be cut.

The SNP-led Fife Council appears to have come to Labour's aid in the dispute. Ahead of the emergency education meeting today, in information given to local councillors, Barrie Lawrie, the director of finance and resources, said that "the current budget does not include costs associated with the introduction of free school meals."

And James McKinstry, the senior resources manager in education services at Fife Council, confirmed: "The current three-year budget does not include the costs of the roll-out."

Ken Macintosh, Labour's schools spokesman, said: "Whatever ministers or Pat Watters are saying, it is clear the money has not been provided and the Scottish Government is trying to pass the buck for its broken promises on to councils, which is outrageous."





The full article contains 511 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 October 2008 9:37 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

ochone,

Sauchie, Clack's 09/10/2008 09:53:45
It's amazing, it would seem that there have been councils who agreed to the concordat without actually reading it first!
2

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/10/2008 10:09:33
"Give the kids free school meals"

"We would like to but we don't have the money to do it"

"Just do it"

"Can we have more money then?

"No. Just do it"

Whilst a laudible idea, it is unworkable. I wonder how many other unworkable ideas have been mooted during this session of Parliament? Lets see, we have...

1. Raise age lmit for alcohol to 21
2. Minimum price per unit
3. Separate isles and counters for alcohol
4. Hide tobacco products from prying eyes

How many more ridiculous ideas are this stupid government going to come up with before people realise that (some of them) are a band of loonies? For christs sake, in some ways they are even worse than stupid labour... And I never thought I would ever say that.
3

Miss H,

09/10/2008 10:34:26
1 Its all council officers who have been quoted.

This is an underlying issue. Who runs councils - the councillors or the officers?
4

Rasco,

Inverness 09/10/2008 10:40:17
We are always told to read the small print before signing any agreement,it does not say much for supposed clever people running our councils if they sigh up and then come back and say oh we did not know we had signed for free school meals and I include all Parties.I can't see Pat Watters being taken in by any one has been long enough in the job.I would have thought the Lab/Party would have been all forthe free meals as they are supposed to be the working mans party and Wendy was always on about the poor kids.
5

j fortitude ,

09/10/2008 11:12:16
4 Poor kids already get free school meals - this is for rich kids
6

Resolutions,

09/10/2008 11:42:54
Let me get this straight! There was an agreement signed re the funding each council was to receive and included within that settlement was a provision of what was to be costed in. In this case FREE school meals. Right.

Presumeably if you have got this dod of cash, you then look at what must be provided from it and divide up the cash accordingly, so that you know what you are doing? Right. Think that is called budgeting.

Right you've divied up the money without looking at what you HAVE to provide and sit back smug like. Then you suddenly realise that the money had to cover certain things and it was up to you to put the labels on and NOT the cash providers. (OK they used to put the wee labels on, so you did not need to exercise your wee grey cells!)

If course you dodos there is NO MONEY in your budget which you set.

Pat Watters was not taken in. He just made the mistake that the Cooncils understood what responsibilities they had!

One word to the Dumbo Cooncils - go back and do your sums again PROPERLY including what you know you must provide and maybe 'jaunts and jolies' should be a wee small label!!

Then make your case if you have to!
7

Resolutions,

09/10/2008 12:20:42
Aye who did the Budgets?
"The SNP-led Fife Council appears to have come to Labour's aid in the dispute. Ahead of the emergency education meeting today, in information given to local councillors, Barrie Lawrie, the director of finance and resources, said that "the current budget does not include costs associated with the introduction of free school meals."

And James McKinstry, the senior resources manager in education services at Fife Council, confirmed: "The current three-year budget does not include the costs of the roll-out."

Who did things the way it was aye done and did not look properly? Who in fact, presented inaccurate budgets to elected members, which did not meet the condidtions they had signed up for?
Mind you the elected members should have asked more questions or did they only look at the 'expenses bittie'?

8

Calvinist,

09/10/2008 13:56:27
You hear that now naughty council leaders! Get on with it and do what nice Mr. Salmond tells you.
9

Calvinist,

09/10/2008 13:59:56
#2 well said,

A man after my own heart.
10

Resolutions,

09/10/2008 18:52:25
#2 and #9 Grow up!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.