Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Call to accept spelling mistakes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 August 2008
COMMONLY misspelt words should not be corrected but accepted into everyday usage, a university lecturer suggested today.
Years of correcting his students' atrocious spelling has left Professor Ken Smith so fed up that he is proposing the most common spelling mistakes should simply be accepted as "variant spellings".

Dr Smith, a criminology lecturer at Buckinghamshir
e New University in High Wycombe, said: "Instead of complaining about the state of the education system as we correct the same mistakes year after year, I've got a better idea.

"University teachers should simply accept as variant spellings those words our students most commonly misspell.

"The spelling of the word 'judgement', for example, is now widely accepted as a variant of 'judgment', so why can't 'truely' be accepted as a variant spelling of 'truly'?"

As a starting point, Dr Smith has put forward ten words that are most commonly misspelt by his students. These include 'arguement' for 'argument' and 'twelth' for 'twelfth'.

He has even suggested adding the word 'misspelt' to the list and all those that break the 'i before e' rule – namely weird, seize, neighbour and foreign.

Jack Bovill, chairman of the Spelling Society, said they would not be advocating changes just yet. He said: "It's a waste of time if people aren't aware of the problems caused by the irregularity of English spelling in the first place."





The full article contains 230 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 11:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 08/08/2008 00:26:17
"Instead of complaining about the state of the education system as we correct the same mistakes year after year, I've got a better idea."

So have I mate, get teachers to do their job properly and teach the kids how to spell.
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 01:52:27

C..A..T, Spells CAT!

R..A..T, Spells RAT!

Boy Wonder! did I pass the Test,?
3

Fanling,

Switzerland 08/08/2008 01:54:06
Ninety-four oot o ten, Charlie.
4

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 08/08/2008 02:06:22
I have a simple solution to ensure correct spelling. When in doubt look up the word in a dictionary. every student ought to have one. Relying on 'spellcheck' is a waste of time.
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 02:17:11

Fanling ~3,

'Ha Ha' very funny! Gods Sake! Boy Blunder has brainwashed you all!
6

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 08/08/2008 02:19:09
Students can be broken of the habit of misspelling quite easily. As a high school chemistry teacher I deducted up to half the points on a lab report for misspelling or bad usage. By the third or fourth write-up, errors vanished.
A criminology professor should be the last one to tolerate these mistakes, since (according to a friend in the local police department) poorly-written reports cost numerous convictions.
7

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 04:58:05
I am the first to admit that I can't spell very well but I have a form of Dyslexia which runs away with me if I type/write too fast ! This however is more dumbing down of an already dumbed down system - you have got to draw the line somewhere !?

6 - spot on !
8

Vincent-W,

08/08/2008 06:54:11
That's OK - they can all get jobs writing headlines for the Skottsmun.
9

yolanda,

08/08/2008 07:08:27

Dr Smith, a criminology lecturer at BuckinghamshirADVERTISEMENT e New University in High Wycombe, said: "Instead of complaining about the state of the education system as we correct the same mistakes year after year, I've got a better idea"....

Yes, so have I - Stop dumbing down our education system! Improve the standards of teaching in order to address the issue, and don't just take the easy option of accepting something simply because it's too much of an effort to improve it!

If the educators can't educate, they shouldn't be in the job!
10

yolanda,

08/08/2008 07:20:34

Oops! I haven't made a spelling mistake above. The word "Advertisement" has sneaked in as I copied and pasted from the article!
11

Kate,

Zurich 08/08/2008 07:40:48
Bad spelling should not be tolerated and "variants" should certainly not be encouraged. How are people learning the language supposed to get on if there are so many anomalies and so much confusion?

I like what Tom in Belmont says and we had something similar in Montrose when I was at school.
12

Nell,

Far from the Struan 08/08/2008 07:55:14
What a great idea. Oh and while we're at it why not use a similar idea for other subjects. Maths for instance. Is it really important if you end up with the right answer. And then we could apply it to engineering. If you were designing a building say, or a plane, as long as it's there or there about, what does it matter?
13

Climate change is a fraud,

08/08/2008 08:07:23
http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/
14

hertscot,

08/08/2008 08:19:50
wats' rong wiff spelin the od wurd incorrectly.

#5 Charlie, I ain't brainwashed (tho sometimes braindead)
15

Grumpy,

08/08/2008 08:34:39
(12) - great idea about the maths - accountants have been doing that for years!

No wonder this country is going to the dogs when stndards are dropped like what has been suggested with spelling. What's next? Murder becomes acceptable? Fraud is OK? Driving at 120mph in a housing estate is fine?



16

Big Jock McDoc,

Scotland 08/08/2008 08:41:24
Shouldn't an English rather than criminology lecturer be the judge of whether misspelling is acceptable or not?

It smells of a way of individuals like him of getting out of extra work but the implications is that it will produce a society of illiterates. This may be beneficial for politicians who will find it easier to control but not the sort of thing that will help this country compete in the global economy.
17

Mike S,

08/08/2008 09:05:53
I see Dr Smith teaches at a dumbed down university, perhaps if emphasis was placed on spelling he would have fewer students. It would be interesting to see the validaty of laws and contracts drawn up by lawyers who could not spell.
18

Boy Wonder,

08/08/2008 09:07:05
This criminology expert is committing a serious crime in advocating this nonsense!

The English language took centuries to evolve, reaching it's height in the late 1800s, then slowly over the next 100 years, relaxing some of the really sillier strictures. It is now the most widely spoken language internationally, ruling commerce and Information Technology ... and this idiot wants to cheapen it by accepting bad spelling? No ... a thousand times no! Get the idiots taught correctly! Keep at them till it goes through their thick skulls that bad spelling shows them up for not paying attention at school! (Dyslexics aside!)

And Chuckles ... well done for finding your correct level! :D
19

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 08/08/2008 09:25:05
Let's apply the same logic to, let's say, computer programming. No chance. One letter or symbol wrong and it just plain does not work! Believe me I know!

Strikes me the Doctor needs to run a few spelling classes for his 1st year intake and take the ruler across their knuckles if they get it wrong.

The informal spelling stuff works OK socially, e.g. texts - "gr8" etc. But where the communication has to be more formal and protocols have to be observed - say in the application of the law, in which he has an interest, you have to follow the protocols or risk losing your client's case!
20

JG,

Fife 08/08/2008 09:49:07
The things is, if students can't be bothered to learn how to spell words properly how can you rely on them to do anything else properly?
21

radge dug,

Alba gu brath! 08/08/2008 10:01:28
English is a brochan of a language anyway. It's already changed and dropped much of it's German roots. Spelling has changed too. It still remains woefully illogical. Why do 'read' and 'read' have the same spelling but different sounds? 'Read' and 'red'??? 'Door' and 'poor'?

Gaelic meanwhile, despite having a smaller alphabet - hence the letter combinations - is much more regular. It only has 10 irregular verbs compared to the hundreds in English, French and Spanish.

Mar sin dheth, suas leis a' Ghàidhlig!
22

hertscot,

08/08/2008 10:07:21
I was always told that I could speak any way I pleased, but, always spell properly when writing.
23

Jung,

08/08/2008 10:49:54
Perhaps a spelling test should be a necessary part of the registration procedure for this site!
24

Mcsnagpile,

08/08/2008 11:06:50
Yes mutant spelling and grammar is acceptable. The great unwashed have a right to self-expression. I always find good grammar and spelling gets in the way of creative writing. Now was that my adjectival noun clause or was it a hole in the wall.
25

The Daleks,

Longmen 08/08/2008 11:32:37
Doktorr Smitt iz a cloun.
26

Number 6,

Germany 08/08/2008 12:29:00
What next Prof counting errors to be tolerated.

Talk about dumbing down education. With morons like this being given airspace, Englandshire will be back in the dark ages before long.

I wonder what this "Criminology" lecturer's academic qualifications are.
27

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 08/08/2008 12:30:03
Where is this university? Sounds like a former Allied Carpet warehouse to me.
28

Corky,

08/08/2008 12:45:22
radge dug - what is your point?
29

Fanling,

Switzerland 08/08/2008 13:47:08
#11 Kate, Zurich

"...we had something similar in Montrose when I was at school."

Too true, Kate. We also called them teachers.
30

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/08/2008 18:16:37
Are we to accept the "dumbing-down" of the written English language because many students no longer read for pleasure anymore but would rather watch film adaptations of the classics or "text" their tiresome twaddle and consider themselves "wordsmiths" - if they even knew what that word meant.

Get ready for some incomprehensible and non-communicative writing from the next generation. After all, they know EVERYTHING.
31

googler,

08/08/2008 19:06:06
Watt a lode of horlix. (What a load of ....)

Did all his students apply for journalistic posts at The Scotsman? Does this explain why the paper's writers can't tell (in the motoring context) 'brakes' from 'breaks', or why they persist in writing questions without question marks?

Let's see how the country would fare if this approach were adopted in some 'mission-critical' applications - evidently it won't matter if the cruise missile lands on the military target, or something else that's fairly close.

As long as NASA sends a mission to somewhere in the region of the moon, that'll do. They might land on it, they might not.

Grrr...
32

Fi,

08/08/2008 20:32:29
Dear number 4, are you completely stupid?

If you don't know how to spell a word, how on earth are you going to be able to look it up in a dictionary? By definition, a dictionary relies upon the user being able to spell the word they seek to find the meaning of.

The most ridiculous aspect of the reported academic's contention is, in fact, to render dictionaries unusable. If there are multiple spellings of a word, how can anyone know which they should look up to find the true meaning of a word? Should dictionaries become five or ten times the size to accommodate ignorance? Or , should we all go back to hitting each other on the head with the bones of the animals we've eaten, a la 2001: A Space Oddyssey.

I've a genius level IQ, but that doesn't mean I don't have problems with the spelling of the odd word, and therefore rely on being able to use a spell check to help me find something in the dictionary.

I was bullied by a school teacher by the vindictive attitude that it is possible to look up words when we can't spell them.

If you don't remember the vowels in the first syllable of, for example, diarrhea, you will have to trawl through tens of pages of dictionary entries before you find it.

As sport, I tend to read the full open two pages of a dictionary when I look up a word, simply because I want to see if there is something I don't know... but saying spelling is the ability to look up a dictionary is absolutes nonsense.

You should at least retract your fallacious nonsense.
33

danbob,

08/08/2008 21:00:49
I raely dnot know what the probelm is. Notihng wrnog with my spelilng. You can sitll read it.
34

Calum Crubag,

Dùn Eideann 09/08/2008 09:31:44
Aye, English spelling is ridiculous - there seems to be no system or logic to it. Try teaching it to others.

I agree, more Scots should learn and use Gaelic. Once ou know the phonics, its much more regular.
35

Calum Crubag,

09/08/2008 09:33:54
#30 Tim from Canada. English has already been 'dumbed down'. Do you still use the archaic Germanic grammar that we used to have? What happened to gender of nouns?
36

Vincent-W,

09/08/2008 11:02:40
Calum Crubag - wondered where you had got to! Your posts are far more frequent during term time.

You are probably right about the simplicity of Gaelic, however, it is impractical to expect the millions of English speakers to convert to Gaelic. there are other more common languages, German also has highly regular phonics, and would be much more use in the modern world.

English is a language made up from many sources and therefore has irregularities. For the same reason it also has a huge vocabulary and fantastic ability for expression. The danger is this could be compromised by simplification.

The fact that so many people have mastered the peculiarities of English would suggest that this capability is well within the compass of human ability. We are lowering the expectations of achievement all the time.

We must also accept that the English language is a living thing and will change and evolve. Many rules and norms of even 20 years ago are now changed and will continue to change.

Calum - I agree it is sad and tragic that joys and benefits of Gaelic have diminished to the point where only a tiny minority can enjoy them, however, your implication that Gaelic should supplant English is probably not practical. Also, I'm sure that if Gaelic had flourished like English we would be having the same debate about the dumbing down of Gaelic.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.