Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Burning Issue: Can schools play a key role in teaching pupils about healthy eating?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 August 2008
Yes

FIONA HYSLOP

Cabinet secretary for education and lifelong learning
WE BELIEVE providing healthy and nutritious school meals from an early age will help young people develop and grow, but know improving food in schools is only one piece of the puzzle. It is essential children learn about healthy eating in school,
if we are to change Scotland's bad eating habits. Health promotion guidance issued in May, with new guidance on health and wellbeing, make clear we expect schools to help children understand how diet and health are connected.

We know schools alone cannot change eating habits of future generations, but they have an essential role to play. That's why we undertook a free school meals trial this year for P1-P3. Feedback has been positive and we will publish a report on the findings soon. If the findings are positive, and subject to the necessary legislation being passed, we have agreed in our concordat with Cosla to roll out free school meals for all P1-P3 children in Scotland from August 2010.

New regulations for primary schools have removed sweets and fizzy drinks from sale. Chips are only served as part of a balanced meal. Habits of secondary pupils are more difficult to change, so we are not expecting them to adopt healthier menus until next August.

It is encouraging that local authorities are embracing this opportunity to make a difference and some have seen rises in uptake of school meals. We recognise the challenge posed by chip and burger vans, but some councils have taken steps to stop them trading near schools at lunchtime. Others have introduced their own vans with healthy options. This proves schools can have an influence on making children healthier and more active.

No

CARINA NORRIS,

a nutritionist researching a PhD at Queen Margaret University on school lunches

THE problem with children's food choices is they generally aren't interested in their health – just in the taste of the food. Issues such as long-term health and future risk of diseases like heart disease and cancer they don't see as relevant because they live for the present.

Current research is showing that when children are given access to a variety of foods including unhealthy options, the chances are they will go for junk food laden in fat and sugar with the consequent knock-on effect for their long-term health.

Unfortunately, now children are allowed out of school at lunchtime, depending on where the school is, they are getting access to a whole range of foods that would not be available to them in the school dining hall. It's all down to access, if the children can't get the food, they can't eat it.

One problem is a lot of shops offering unhealthy meal deals, which seem to be targeted towards children, and fast-food vans which often park near schools.

The solution is going to be difficult because it is multi-faceted. Now that children are allowed out of schools, if we try to restrict them and keep them in, it will probably be seen as intervention of the nanny state.

Providing healthy school meals is significant progress, but it results in children voting with their feet and leaving the premises to graze on their favourite junk food.

Unfortunately, the genie is out of the bottle. Ideally, we would keep children on the school premises, eating healthy lunches but it's going to be very difficult to achieve.





The full article contains 587 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 August 2008 10:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Prester John,

Pots_n_Pans 21/08/2008 07:31:04
What happened to parenting and parental responsibility?

We were reasonably relaxed about our children and school lunches. We knew they were going to shops at lunchtimes at secondary school and often eating 'fast' food but all of the rest of their diet was good food eaten at home. They were also encouraged to take a lot of exercise so nullifying most of the effects of the extra calories.

And now ? Both eat healthily and well with good body shapes. Getting 'heavy' about fast food at that stage would only created the 'forbidden fruit' syndrome with adverse long-term consequences. That was also our attitude to alcohol where we introduced small amounts from their early teens in the French tradition. Neither drink excessively now and have a for more mature attitude (and informed palates) to drinking than many of their so-called elders and betters.

I'm all for informed choice but totally opposed to the nanny state in all its manifestations. That includes elf-n-safety. Whatever happened to common sense and personal responsibility ?
2

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 21/08/2008 07:57:08
The law penalises neglectful/cruel parents, doesn't it? So why not add allowing/enabling your child to become obese to the list of cruel practices? A fat child suffers abuse from its peers and then from poor health in adulthood (diabetes, joint and heart stress, etc). Allowing this is surely wilful neglect.
3

Boy Wonder,

21/08/2008 08:09:11
They're kids ... they're supposed to burn up their calories with play and running daft! Limit TV /X-Box and computer times and get them out into contructive play ... then they can eat what they want! Chips and all!

Get them outside to play and exercise. They do enough sitting around in classrooms!
4

danielrober,

21/08/2008 10:23:23
I don't like new taxes. They tend to be used for a completly different purpose to what they have been started for. Yet, why not have some tax of fast food (burgers, curry, chips, kebabs, pizza etc).

The money raised need not be too high to affect business adversly, but thisis an issue of respondsibility. The extra income could be used for decent school meals either free or at least subsidised.

Tobaco and alcohol pay extra tax to pay for problems which they are a 'part of', if not the cause of. Why not the same for fast food?
5

G,

dundy 21/08/2008 13:07:54
The schools have to educate the kids in healthy eating because their parents can't or won't...just like physics, understanding and teaching about healthy eating is beyond some parents.....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.