Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scots schools to get sexual health clinics



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 September 2008
SIXTY thousand Scots pupils are to be given access to sexual health services in school, allowing children as young as 13 to receive condoms and pregnancy tests.
Ministers have approved the creation of clinics for all rural secondary schools in Scotland after the SNP Government accepted expert advice that many teenagers in country areas struggle to visit GPs or family planning clinics.

The unprecedented move is part of a bid to tackle Scotland's high rate of sexually-transmitted diseases and pregnancy among teenagers.

Pupils both above and below the age of consent will be able to get contraceptives – and tests for chlamydia – on school premises without the knowledge of their parents, provided nurses are sure they are not being abused or exploited.

Last night, critics attacked the move and warned that it could prove a danger to teenagers' health. The recommendation, now officially endorsed by the Scottish Government, was made in a report by sexual health experts on the Government's National Sexual Health Advisory Committee.

Research by the committee found that access to health services in rural areas is "challenging", with many residents living more than a 30-minute drive from a GP or chemist.

It found Dumfries and Galloway had the highest rate in Scotland of chlamydia among under-25s, while Highland had the third highest rate. Dumfries and Galloway also had the second highest rate of teenage pregnancies in Scotland among 13 to 15-year-olds. Abortion rates in Perth and Kinross and East Lothian are above the national average.

Around one quarter of under-16s in Scotland are sexually active and the nation's sexual health record is one of the worst in Europe.

Shirley Fraser, health improvement programme manager at NHS Health Scotland and author of the report, said: "The view of those who contributed to the report is that consideration should be given to providing services in or near to schools and that this should include sexual health information and services such as chlamydia testing, pregnancy testing and condoms."

She added: "In terms of wider contraception provision in schools, it will be up to individual schools and school health services to agree what to provide."

A small number of Scottish schools currently offer some sexual health services, including offering condoms, pregnancy tests and testing for chlamydia. But this is the first time the move has been authorised on such a massive scale.

A spokesman for the Scottish Government said: "We would anticipate that these services would be available to the whole school population, although this would be determined by local consultation.

"The level of health service provided would depend entirely on the setting. A number of schools in Scotland already provide general health advice, including sexual health advice. These may offer pregnancy testing, chlamydia testing and free condoms. No school in Scotland provides emergency contraception – the 'morning-after pill' – and there are no plans for this to change."

Lorraine Mann, a health promotion specialist at NHS Highland and a member of the working group which compiled the report, said pupils in remote areas needed better access to sexual health services because they often live so far away from clinics that attending appointments is impossible.

Mann said: "Pupils are often bussed to school and sexual health services are many miles away. It could be an 80-mile round trip to the nearest GP. There has always been a lack of understanding about this problem.

"Young people in remote and rural areas simply do not have the same access to services as those in more populated areas. The question is whether there's a way of redressing that through using school nurses."

But critics last night raised grave concerns. Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman Mary Scanlon said: "Simply to hand out condoms in a school is sending out the wrong message and not encouraging personal responsibility. They need far more information and education. If it was going to happen then this is an area that requires much more consideration."

Michael McGrath, director of the Scottish Catholic Education Service, said the move would not go ahead in Catholic schools and should not go ahead in non-denominational schools.

He said:

"There are other places where pregnancy testing is available with services that young people can access. To place them in the context of schools, where there should be a message about discouraging sexual activity, is contradictory and confusing for young people."

However, Eleanor Coner, information officer for the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, backed the move. She said: "I know that this idea will upset some parents and greatly anger others, but parents should not be alarmed. It is something that would be done very carefully."


The full article contains 781 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 September 2008 1:38 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

07/09/2008 00:02:30
OMG! Does the Pope know?
2

Charles Linskaill,

Is the 10year wait about to-be a reality? 07/09/2008 00:12:26

Put the idea on their doorstep, and the underage WILL have sex, this WILL result in more sexually related diseases, the figure will soon go, 'through-the-roof'

A Picture of I take a 'boy' holding a packet of condoms, is a joke, yes obtain them, but when,..

'Push-comes-to-Crunch' Will he use them,?

Maybe if your lucky 50% would, but I fear temptation for this age group, will dictate otherwise.
3

the_figures_are _fudged,

Galashiels 07/09/2008 00:12:55
Correct me if I am wrong , but schools are not just for squeezing pupils through as many exams and tests as possible.

Sex education and sexual health in this era of Aids Herpes and Hepatitis can only be a good thing.
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 00:15:46

#3,

This idea, is to stop the pregnancy rate, don't be fooled otherwise, the diseases you mention will only be aided by this idea!
5

Resolutions,

07/09/2008 00:24:03
What absolute bunkum! There is not an 80 mile round trip to visit GPs anywhere, let alone in rural areas!

We had a 'bus' van thing which was supposed to offer young folk access to 'services' and what happened? The staff on these things took to handing out condoms to anyone passing, no matter what their age! We found the things being used by the kids as water bombs. Talk about developing responsibility.

Now if these clinics were part of a school health service, teaching kids healthy living; about STDs; about how to check relevant parts for girls and boys, and part of growing emotions, it could be a natural part of 'growing up'. But offering testing and handing out condoms, is a step too far. As a parent, this is a GPs job, not something for school.
6

Conan the Librarian™,

07/09/2008 00:24:37
2
Charles, teens will ALWAYS have sex.

It's best to let them know a wee bit about the consequences, it may dissuade one in two hundred...
7

Vincent-W,

07/09/2008 00:37:42
Seems to me like another Public statement encouraging parents to abrogate THEIR responsibilities.
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 00:46:28

Conan ~6,

That 'sums-it-up',...."one in two hundred..."
9

Conan the Librarian™,

07/09/2008 00:48:18
8
How is DYW?
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 01:10:32

Conan ~9,

Thanks for asking! DYW (Suzanne) had her embryo transfer on Tuesday, so its all rather nerve-racking, on the 2week wait to see if our 10year wait, becomes a reality, (blood test on day 14)

But we both are giving this all our best, relaxing round the house last week, with the occasional outing.

She not showing it, but it must be a 'tender time' for her, she keeps asking me,.."do you think it will work"?
11

FTH22inarow,

07/09/2008 02:43:44
6 lucky barstewards.
12

Slack-jawed in disbelief,

Pennsylvania 07/09/2008 03:25:25
So, let me see if I understand this. It has been demonstrated that the rates of STD's and teen pregnancy have increased along with the rise in the provision of "sex education" and "services" such as these. I know -- let's just do even more of the same! Sounds like the definition of insanity to me: doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results....
13

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 04:02:19

Slack-jawed in disbelief ~12,

Know Wonder your sign in name!

You have got it in 'a owner'!
14

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 04:05:30

re mistake,
*owner* should read *one-er*
15

Slack-jawed in disbelief,

Pennsylvania 07/09/2008 04:27:34
13 & 14 - Thank you. I just can't believe how much better off we and our children are than our forefathers, thanks to such far-sighted and benevolent government programmes in this and other areas (said with utmost sarcasm). Government has a unique talent for heaping more wood on the bonfire of the social and moral meltdown of civilsation.
16

Gabe,

Milwaukee 07/09/2008 06:17:56
Peeps:
This whole teen pregnancy thing is politico-social dynamite. On the one hand you can't blame the government no matter the political stripe for the behavior of teens. Teenagers are walking hormone bombs. When I was in my teens I'd have done anyone that said yes. Giving kids condoms doesn't lead to more STD's & pregnancies. If they use them it cuts these back. Anyone that truly thinks there was less hanky-panky in the "old days" is misguided. In the "old days" mostly the issues were hidden or the young women were dubbed "witches" and burned or drowned. In the not-quite-so-old days a veil of secrecy was drawn over things. Nowadays, younger teen sisters of fading pop stars, or teen daughters of presidential candidates have their ill-advised pregnancy almost celebrated in the gutter press. Yes, the fear and loathing is real, but don't become part of or succumb to the "victim" mentality. Each and every one of us has personal accountability and responsibility for our own actions. The devil/government/social climate did NOT make any of us do it!!!
17

Douglas,

Bathgate 07/09/2008 09:15:20
Aside from the disease barrier benefits, the pro side of condom use could be reinforced by emphasising to those who refuse to use that their elegibility for council housing and state benefits will begin when their offspring start school. Up until that time their welfare will be the responsibility of their parent(s). This might go some way to reducing the incidence of teenage stretch marks, Burberry prams, white faced weans and bull terriers on our streets.
18

Boy Wonder,

07/09/2008 09:18:40
Spot on #16. There's a reason our offspring are sexually viable from a young age. Before the rise of medical health care, there was a great deal of hit and miss whether babies survived after birth. Natural death apart, life expectancy was short for a multitude of reasons. Saurians lived for around 200 years but probably birthed less young ... so evolution took that in its stride by giving short-lived mammals multiple live births and a shorter gestation period. Add to that the ability to birth others of their kind from a young age ... and humans were better prepared to survive.

Even though times have changed ... sex between the young is inevitable. That's why we need better support networks. Rather that than they fumble in ignorance!
19

albanman,

07/09/2008 09:42:42
For several years the 'Healthy Respect" programme has been used in Scottish secondary schools, and it covers all kinds of sexual issues. This year our school decided to begin teaching about sexual matters lower down the ladder in an attempt to reach kids earlier.

Yet, in spite of having ex-ed in schools for years, we have seen an increase in teenagers becoming sexually active, teenagers becoming pregnant and teenagers going for abortions. The programme (which I present as part of my guidance remit) IS NOT WORKING.

Why? Well, my own opinion is that no matter how much I teach about being safe, using condoms or saying "No" it all goes out the window when teens have had a few drinks. Alcohol is the problem, and it has to be part of the problem-solving equation.
20

Douglas,

Bathgate 07/09/2008 09:57:52
#18 Boy Wonder: Nice of you to remind Charles the living fossil that he may be less than half way through his life. :o)
21

Calvinist,

07/09/2008 09:59:23
At last the SNP government has done something which I can applaud! Such a measure is long overdue. Lets hope that this is the beginning of enlightened social policies instead of the pandering to social conservatism we've had to date.
22

Mcsnagpile,

07/09/2008 10:04:27
Condoms are certainly not the answer. In D&G it should be easier to get fin rot than STD. STD’s are notifiable diseases. Any spread of STD’s in remote areas is not acceptable. Heads should roll. Bring back the Birch.
Children should be taught that self abuse is the cheapest, easiest, and healthiest method of sexual release. Children should be given self-stimulation devices instead of condoms. The problem with copulation is you have to please and take responsibility for somebody else,, this is not really with it in our modern on demand lifestyles.
23

Senga Jean,

07/09/2008 10:11:59
I am old enough to remember the trauma suffered by many girls on the occasion of their first menstruation when they thought they were afflicted by a terrible curse (yes slang used it) How many girls ended their lives in fear? WHY ? It was simple IGNORANCE. Learning the truth about this world is always the best way.
24

Jaq,

07/09/2008 12:03:55
This is wrong no matter what way you look at it. I was brought up in the belief that the government was there to serve the people who vote them in. In what way does this serve us, where do we get a say in this. In these days when you can be prosecuted for failing to send your children to school, where it will soon be common place for parents of fat kids to be prosecuted for child abuse and neglect, in other words enforcing the Idea that a parent has responsibility for their child. How can they without parental consent educate a child that it is ok for them to break the law, (Law being you must be 16 to be of legal age of consent.) How can a school have a clinic that will help your child have an abortion without your consent? Educate your child to be promiscuous with no consequences? A baby is for life and it is something that a child will live with for life, if it goes the abortion route, or the having the baby route. Our children are our future, this program they are forcing on us is taking away parental rights. It is marching us further into moral decline. In my opinion without our consent. Perhaps it is time that people took a long hard look at those in power; after all we put them there. They think it is ok to enforce one set of rules and ride roughshod over the ones that suit them. They are our children, if your next door neighbour started teaching your 12 year old about sex they would be labelled a paedophile, if they gave your underage child condoms they would be arrested. Someone please tell me in what way this is different, why do the government have a right to break the law? Because I for one am sick of it. The law is for everyone not to be bent and broken because our moral less government thinks it is ok.
25

santa cova,

London 07/09/2008 12:07:08
#1 It does not surprise me that Scotland is still producing Idiots like you!
26

Centurion2,

Glasgow 07/09/2008 12:09:36
We currently have more sex "education", contraceptive devices, pills and "sexperts" than we have ever had in our history, yet we are European leaders in underage pregnancies, abortions and STDs.

Why? Because nowhere in the preamble or text of the Scottish Government's utterly failed Sexual Health Strategy do the words Fidelity, Love, Morality or Marriage appear.
The primary cause of all the dreadful health statistics is Promiscuity, which is totally ignored in this pseudo-strategy.
27

Centurion2,

Glasgow 07/09/2008 12:14:44
We currently have more sex "education", contraceptive devices, pills and "sexperts" than we have ever had in our history, yet we are European leaders in underage pregnancies, abortions and STDs.

Why? Because nowhere in the preamble or text of the Scottish Government's utterly failed Sexual Health Strategy do the words Fidelity, Love, Morality or Marriage appear.
The primary cause of all the dreadful health statistics is Promiscuity, which is totally ignored in this pseudo-strategy.
28

santa cova,

London,where the streets are paved with gold. 07/09/2008 12:18:47
#28....A most refreshing and excellent post.

Well done!

29

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 12:43:42

Centurion2 ~28,

My point exactly in respect, and just shows the ignorences of the ones who dont understand, the end results.
30

subrosa,

07/09/2008 13:13:03
How sad that our society is reduced to this. Supplying more aids to under 16s law breaking behaviour is just not on. Where is self respect in these children? I don't remember anyone under 16 having sex in my day. We were too d**ned scared our parents would disown us and we'd have to go into one of these homes for unmarried mothers. The boys were too scared because of parents and the fact that they didn't want to have to marry as soon as they were 16.

Yes we were disciplined by fear - and it worked. We were also taught the values # 28 mentions.

Our society is decaying rapidly to please the softly softly liberal lot. I don't want my grandchildren to be able to pick up condoms etc when at school. I want them to get an education in reading, writing and maths etc. Also I will ensure their parents talk to them about sex and the values of self respect.


31

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 13:21:54

subrosa ~32,

Again Agreed!
32

should have gone to specsavers,

Thurso 07/09/2008 13:49:59
12:
> It has been demonstrated that the rates of STD's
> and teen pregnancy have increased along with the
> rise in the provision of "sex education"
> and "services" such as these

According to a documentary on itv the other night there were actually more teenage mothers in the 70's than there are today, if true then the provision of sexual health services would actually be a good thing.

32:
> Yes we were disciplined by fear - and it worked
Are you sure? There are stories of boys in the 70's who refused to recognise thier role in the birth of children and of parents who disowned daughters who got pregant. Nowadays? This is less true.
33

DesertRatNM,

NM USA 07/09/2008 14:24:47
We have been doing this for at least 25 years in the US; hasn't made any difference except we have more children without fathers than ever before. Good parents still the best sex education.
34

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 07/09/2008 14:40:09
#32 Subrosa
You're absolutely correct. It seems that the introduction of sex education in schools has had the opposite effect of what it was designed to do. A little knowledge has always been a dangerous thing and rather than simply teach children the basic facts of life, sex education has now gone far beyond that and is largely responsible for the huge number of young girls whose lives have been ruined by teenage pregnancies. The pendulum might eventually swing back to a more responsible attitude towards sex, but don't bank on it for some time yet.
35

chics311,

sarasota 07/09/2008 15:25:53
Math education improves math skills ,English education improves English skills .What does sex education improve.?
36

Douglas,

Bathgate 07/09/2008 15:37:54
Orgasmisational skills?
37

Douglas,

Bathgate 07/09/2008 15:55:51
Why men are winners: they tend to come first most of the time.:o)
38

Bluevoice,

Dubai U.A.E. 07/09/2008 16:18:41
I am so glad that I don't have to bring my daughter up in Scotland.
39

jett,

aden 07/09/2008 16:19:49
i think sexual health checks will be a good cover to find out who's shagging who who the pimps are and it will also map the drugs misuse and who is dealing. most people will tell you that drugs and ilegal sex go together they are vices. when i was at school there were children on drugs and alcohol and to sustain this they had to acquire more cash than their parents would give them especially if some of them knew. pimps like black leather jackets but not all but enough for me to direct you to the bank bar at the junction with the royal mile and the bridges. pimps always run kids in fact it can be more dangerous to expose a pedophile than any other criminal because of their connections through the pimp. their connections are criminal and within the so called law and ruling parties. child care homes now and when i was a child still encourage child prostitution because of the social and financial advancements they provide. the adult care services launder pedophiles i want them and their pimps in jail.
40

,

07/09/2008 16:39:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

CANUCK,

07/09/2008 19:53:15
Sexual intellegence education in all its forms and all that goes with it, IS required to be taught at schools and taught well - Who else can do it?? Parents ? Church ? Friends ? some Organisation ?
Sexual knowledge has never hurt anyone but lack of
it can be life destroying and mind distrorting.
Sex in the physical, sexual understanding and the feelings that sex has on the body, mind and emotions, needs to be fully taught throughout all childrens school years. The earlier it is introduced and taught the easier it will become. Today it seems that the 8 to 13 year old are at most risk.
It is a pity that Sexual Intellegence courses are not available to adults of all ages.
42

danbob,

07/09/2008 20:18:23
So if our kids are going on a school trip we have to fill in forms giving consent, medical history forms, next of kin forms, forms to say they can recieve medical treatment should they need it. But hey suddenly us parents we have no rights of knowledge if some do gooder wants to give them condoms so they can commit the crime of having underage sex. No wonder the country is in a state of moral bankruptcy.
43

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 07/09/2008 20:21:15
I take it that the frock wearing bachelor priests of the Church of Rome have given this the green light, since they seem to be the sole authority who determine what information on sexual health is made available to Scottish schoolgirls?
44

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 07/09/2008 20:21:18
I take it that the frock wearing bachelor priests of the Church of Rome have given this the green light, since they seem to be the sole authority who determine what information on sexual health is made available to Scottish schoolgirls?
45

CANUCK,

07/09/2008 20:38:55
DANBOB 44.

Yes, you can bet your boots on it, in this increasingly letigous world, without a doubt.

A child without sexual intellegence or having been brought up without some form self understanding or family moral behavior, given a condom might as well be handed a loaded gun.
46

its still time,

livi 07/09/2008 20:54:57
the spokesman for the catholic church says "would not happen in catholic schools" who does he think he is. the catholic church doesnt own the schools, scotland owns the schools, people of all faiths and none. what a bunch of creationist nutters. Putting young kids hesalth at risk. good a reason as any for scrapping them all! non denominational for all schools - its time!

except that salmond will pander to their right wing religious nuttery - see ian mason!
47

Ribbonman,

Glasgow 07/09/2008 21:07:03
#45 Flubby....... Why dont you contribute something constructive to this debate instead of your usual anti Catholic ignorant bigotry,which really belongs in the 17th century.In fact I think thats where you belong.
Just grow up you Idiot!
48

Ribbonman,

Glasgow 07/09/2008 21:16:13
#48 The Catholic church or any other church for that matter has a right to pronounce on issues of morality.If the Catholic church feels that the children in its schools are at risk from this hair brained idea,then they have every right to reject it.We do live in a democracy you know,not a narrow minded orange statelet that our friend at post#45 would have us live in.

I accept the point that you are making and your concerns,but as I have just said,we do live in a democracy,and all of our people have a right to make a choice in relation to our children.
49

jett,

aden 07/09/2008 23:23:04
i do not think that any one would be teaching children anything remotely corrupting in a school children are not stupid just vulnerable and exploitable under certain circumstances. condoms would prevent pregnancy and disease for those who venture towards an early sex life life rather than an education. i know that the brutality of the catholic church as most will agree can turn any child sour.
50

Richard Lionheart,

07/09/2008 23:53:56
Typical British political response. The existing policy has failed to yield the desired results. Let's go further with it. It should be back to the drawing board.
51

LV Scot,

North Las Vegas 08/09/2008 03:54:30
Good luck with that. You're catching up with the "right-wing crazed creationist" USofA. We've had it for years. Still have 35% of children born to unmarried minors.
52

Catharine,

winnipeg 08/09/2008 05:12:05
So no sex before marriage is the answer, is it? Right! It hasn't worked throughout recorded history, (remember a young lass named Mary - got knocked up and gave birth in a stable??) but a few self-righteous people with misguided, quasi-religious attitudes claiming it must be so makes it so? Huh. My grandfather, who was born in 1880, used to say that all first babies were born at 7 months or earlier, but then, Grandad had a great sense of humour, and understood human nature a whole lot better than most of you. Giving teenagers condoms and the real facts about sexual activity is NOT going to make them have sex - they're doing that anyway! With STDs on the rise and an horrendous teen pregnancy rate, Scotland needs to do something different - and it ain't forcing 17 year olds to get married because of a bun in the oven!
53

voltaire's janny,

08/09/2008 08:22:27
When I lived in Texas, there was a practice amongst teens (god-botherers mostly) to engage freely in O & A while maintaining their V to give to a future H. This is a classic response to externally imposed morality and underpins the delusional former P's "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

Education, knowledge, consequences. Armed with these when girls (because they supply the Yes) finally drop their drawers, the unintended, undesirable outcomes will be less.

The Dutch with their extremely liberal views start doing it later, are protected when they do and have far lower STDs and teen pregnancies than Britain.

If instead of catapulting teen mums to the front of the housing list, they were offered shared tenancies or hostel type accommodation, perhaps the rampant culture of "get a wean, get a hoose" would recede.

54

Big Carbon Footprint,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 11:16:35
What a load of old coblers from you left wings hand wringing liberals, look at the facts the places in Scotland which have the highest rates of sexual education and services has very high teenage pregnancies.

You all may and try and say it's not that simple, wake up you dozing muppets
55

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 08/09/2008 13:31:08
About time. This bizarre country has been stuck in the Dark Ages and under the control of idiots in the church for too long.
56

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 08/09/2008 13:33:12
#56 Were you born mad or have you practiced for years?
57

grannie,

Glasgow 08/09/2008 15:48:07
Have all these decision makers been released from the loony bin?. Teach our children self respect,value and pride in themselves instead of making them feel pressured into behaving as adults before they are ready. It would seem that young people are now to be encouraged in schools. This is totally unacceptable and morally wrong. Are there no guide lines?
58

Wullie Anderson,

09/09/2008 17:27:31
49

This coming from the man who believes in killing people of a different persuasion or political viewpoint.

Ribbonman (who's Scottish and never will be Irish) posted various threads recently promoting and supporting the death of Unionists in Ulster.

Obviously Irony hasn't been invented down his way yet.
59

Figgy,

Leeds 09/09/2008 17:47:58
I would like to think that the mods on here have since alterted the police if thats the case no 61.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.