Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tram disruption warning to city



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 August 2008
EDINBURGH has been warned to brace itself for the biggest tram roadworks disruption yet as four months of traffic restrictions start today around Haymarket.
Drivers heading for the city centre from the west will be diverted north of the major junction while underground pipes and cables are moved.

Congestion in the area is likely to be intensified by the Edinburgh Festival and schools restarting next w
eek.

The traffic shake-up will provide a further headache for drivers who have already had to switch routes since the closure of Shandwick Place to cars in March.

However, the tram developers insist the work cannot be postponed because it could delay tram line construction, which is due to follow in February.

Traders yesterday called for the work to be completed in time for the key pre-Christmas period.

Road closures come into force today in advance of roadworks starting on Monday, which are due to last until Christmas.

TIE, the city council firm leading the £500 million tram project, said the complicated north-south and east-west junction was the busiest on the tram route and had the highest density of pipes and cables to be moved.

The work is necessary so they can be accessed in future without disrupting trams, which are due to run between Edinburgh airport and Newhaven by mid-2011.

Work at Haymarket will also involve building a viaduct over the site of the former Caledonian Ale House, beside the Haymarket station, to take trams from street level to beside the railway tracks.

In the first of multi-stage road restrictions, eastbound traffic on Haymarket Terrace will be diverted via Magdala Crescent, Eglinton Crescent and Palmerston Place. Eastbound buses will travel via Rosebery Crescent, Landsdowne Crescent and Grosvenor Street.

Willie Gallagher, the TIE chairman, said September was one of Edinburgh's quietest months, but the Haymarket work could not be put off till then. He said: "We want to get on and make sure we are finished in time for the start of the infrastructure work early next year."

Lothian Buses, which has blamed previous tram roadworks for forcing service cuts, hoped it would not suffer further. Bill Campbell, its operations director, said: "Extensive planning has gone into the bus route diversions, which are designed to result in as little or no disruption for bus passengers."

Graham Russell, the Edinburgh chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: "The job must be finished by the end of November, in time for the peak pre-Christmas spending weekend. I hope businesses do not suffer 1 per cent of what those in Leith Walk suffered during tram works, but I'm sure they will."





The full article contains 446 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Boy Wonder,

16/08/2008 06:44:24
This whole tram business is killing our capital city!
2

Salty,

Midlothian 16/08/2008 08:07:34
Why not just run a train line to and from the airport?
3

eric,

Lothian 16/08/2008 08:41:43
Glasgow has the right idea.Train link to its Airport and High tech trains will run to it . and Subway expansion.We get Tram line that really goes nowhere,
4

eric-shaun,

Lothian 16/08/2008 09:10:30
I'm overcome with Emotion talking about expansion
5

bluehead,

edinburgh 16/08/2008 09:49:59
in my opinion they can take the tram system and stick where the monkeys stick their nuts,
all that terrible waste of money is a disgrace,Edinburgh will always known as the city that threw millions of pounds down the drain,because they already had the best transport system ,by bus ,that anyone could expect
6

Mcsnagpile,

16/08/2008 12:33:53
Disruption??? Just wait until theses clanking monstrosities are commissioned, cluttering up the highways and byways. Why do they not just get steam or horse driven trams while they are at it??
7

bus user,

edinburgh 16/08/2008 13:29:17
At least with horses, you'd get dung for your roses. If you live near Fettes, you have a ready supply from the mounted police on patrol!
8

The Ghost of Sir William Arrol,

The Forthy Bridge 16/08/2008 13:35:17
Perhaps canals will be more appropriate, given the amount of rain we've had this 'summer'.

Trams will be necessary to keep the city moving. There is no 'opt out' from the forthcoming (endless) rises in energy costs that will kill of the motor car as global oil supplies fall year on year after peak oil.

If we don't build sustainable transport systems now, we'll be walking everywhere in the very near future.
9

The Ghost of Sir William Arrol,

The Forthy Bridge 16/08/2008 13:37:25
Kill 'of' should, of course, be spelled 'kill off' - apologies.
10

Andrew,

16/08/2008 14:42:00
Why is this article entitle "Tram disruption warning to city"? I don't see any trams causing disruption and didn't you mean to print the usual traffic disruption term of "chaos"?
11

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 16:04:33
Ghosty - I agree with much of what you are saying - I do think there is a place for electric cars though in our future transport mix. Luckily we are making progress in Scotland away from fossil fuel dependency - electrification of the Central Scotland triangle and trams are a good start.
12

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 16:07:45
#10 You're forgetting this an "upmarket" newspaper, not the EN; they ran their story yesterday - and true to form it did include the 'c' word
13

Andrew,

16/08/2008 21:24:39
The "chaos" word was being kept for use re the airport strike story. It HAD to appear somewhere - AND DID!!
14

Mark Renton,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 22:12:41
Stop the trams now.
15

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 16/08/2008 23:42:30
#2 Salty:
"Why not just run a train line to and from the airport?"

There already IS a trainline running to the airport from Waverley. The Fife line passes within half a mile of the end of Edinburgh's runway. All they needed to do was run a spur line to a new station in the airport - with half a mile of track. Then you could have run trains every ten minutes from Waverley to the airport.

But see, that would only have cost £5 million or so - and nobody would have got rich on fees, consultancies, bribes, sinecures, design studies, PFI and a hundred other way that 'someone' is cashing in on this situation. Edinburgh is always 'held to ransom' by its onw political establishment; the citizens only get what they need after all the 'interests' have been paid off - by the taxpayer.
16

Exiled Leither,

17/08/2008 08:35:52
David Harrington: Exactly where do you think most of the electricity will come from for these trams? Most likely, Longannet and Cockenzie. I know that the National Grid is a nationwide entity but electricity takes the path of least resistance so it is likely that those stations will produce the majority of the power for the trams. Both these stations burn coal which is far less environmentally friendly than a diesel bus and possibly up to 50% less efficient. The trams will use more power to move up a hill than a bus due to the weight and traction, so now that we have established they will use more energy from a less clean source could you explain how trams will be better for the planet?
17

sonofhamish,

edinburgh 17/08/2008 13:23:49
Cant wait for the trams, but the disruptions are certainly going to be a lot of pain before the gain.

In the meanwhile there are two things that would help traffic a lot:

- it would be nice if the Police actually ticketed people parking in the bus lanes, this regurlarly backs up traffic around rush hour when it seems the wardens have gone home to put their feet up
- is it possible that the buses could stop a little less, it seems every 100 feet they have to stop them, ridiculous


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think that tthe number of bus lanes in the city should be increased?
No, they cause congestion rather than ease it
Yes, they will help improve the bus service
Yes, but only if parking spaces are not lost

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.